- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Serial Drive-Thru Flasher Gets 170-Degree Water Dumped On Genitals At Cody Coffee Hut
Posted on 11/24/22 at 6:59 am to Jim Rockford
Posted on 11/24/22 at 6:59 am to Jim Rockford
I’ll allow it.
0
Posted on 11/24/22 at 7:03 am to NIH
quote:
What
She should've went with 130 degree water. He can sue for damages for the burns he suffered. She shouldve claimed it was an accidental reaction to seeing his genitals but this was premeditated.
Most adults will suffer third-degree burns if exposed to 150 degree water for two seconds. Burns will also occur with a six-second exposure to 140 degree water or with a thirty second exposure to 130 degree water. Even if the temperature is 120 degrees, a five minute exposure could result in third-degree burns.
I think she should be able to claim self defense since he sexually 'assaulted' her
This post was edited on 11/24/22 at 7:05 am
Posted on 11/24/22 at 7:11 am to Corinthians420
Not a chance
This case would be worth nuisance value at best.
This case would be worth nuisance value at best.
Posted on 11/24/22 at 7:12 am to ReedRothchild
What is that creepy collage?
Posted on 11/24/22 at 7:15 am to Jim Rockford
I’ve never understood the whole flashing thing. 
Posted on 11/24/22 at 7:29 am to tigerbutt
quote:
It’s a shame this pervert is about to get paid.
Only if a jury of his peers are PERVERTS. Otherwise they all vote not guilty.
Posted on 11/24/22 at 7:36 am to Jim Rockford
Posted on 11/24/22 at 7:42 am to Jim Rockford
Sounds like assault to me, legally. Ethically, it's a very disproportionate reaction that completely changes who the victim is.
Sorry. I don't like perverts, either.
Sorry. I don't like perverts, either.
Posted on 11/24/22 at 8:06 am to Jim Rockford
Posted on 11/24/22 at 8:10 am to boudinman
quote:
Only if a jury of his peers are PERVERTS. Otherwise they all vote not guilty.
I mean I’m not a pervert and my first reaction was how this baristas life was threatened enough to justify 170deg water being poured on someone.
Posted on 11/24/22 at 8:18 am to brass2mouth
Because frick him, that's why.
Maybe she was handing him the water but the sudden sight of his genitals spooked her and she accidentally dropped the cup in his lap. It wouldn't have happened if he had been zipped up.
Maybe she was handing him the water but the sudden sight of his genitals spooked her and she accidentally dropped the cup in his lap. It wouldn't have happened if he had been zipped up.
Posted on 11/24/22 at 8:40 am to Smeg
quote:
Maybe she was handing him the water but the sudden sight of his genitals spooked her and she accidentally dropped the cup in his lap
She already said she recognized the vehicle and started recording video and poured the cup with her back turned to him tho. So there goes that.
Is it justice this perv getting his junk burned? Yes. Is it legal? No.
Posted on 11/24/22 at 8:55 am to Smeg
quote:
Because frick him, that's why. Maybe she was handing him the water but the sudden sight of his genitals spooked her and she accidentally dropped the cup in his lap. It wouldn't have happened if he had been zipped up.
I understand your sentiment, I really do and I even agree.
Just doesn’t change the fact that what she did was illegal.
Posted on 11/24/22 at 8:55 am to Jim Rockford
Wyoming women are different
Posted on 11/24/22 at 9:00 am to Jim Rockford
Good for her.
frick that guy.
frick that guy.
Posted on 11/24/22 at 9:00 am to Cracker
Love Wyoming.
Posted on 11/24/22 at 5:18 pm to SteelerBravesDawg
Was her name Beth?
Posted on 11/24/22 at 5:52 pm to Jim Rockford
It doesn’t seem like for a regular customer this process should have taken almost 7 weeks. 4 or 5 exposures before warrant. Workers recognizing vehicle and so on. If they had questioned him they would have gotten him on not registering as a sex offender immediately plus any witness to initial exposures. Not sure why they waited until being caught in the act.
quote:
That it happened multiple times at two locations is a sign Haines said makes him feel that Crawford’s alleged actions “were very intentional, and it was very targeted. It happened four or five times before the warrant was served” and Crawford was arrested.
Although the Cody Police Department installed video surveillance and watched the coffee kiosks, it was difficult to catch Crawford because he was a regular customer, but wouldn’t flash workers all the time, Haines said.
“He would do it, but then wouldn’t do it for two weeks, but he was an everyday customer,” he said.
This post was edited on 11/24/22 at 5:53 pm
Posted on 11/24/22 at 6:41 pm to boudinman
quote:
Only if a jury of his peers are PERVERTS. Otherwise they all vote not guilty.
You idiots don’t know anything about the law obviously. This guy could have been driving around completely naked all day everyday. She should have called the police. To throw hot water on him is not a self defense or some impulse reaction. She stated she noticed his car in the drive thru so she planned to throw hot water on him. They are about to get sued to hell and back. Stupid
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News