re: Scott Peterson and Lacy Peterson

So was amber fry a happy ending massage person? Looks like it on tonight's episode

Man if anyone watches this a&e series, Def putting doubt in my mind that Scott did this or should have been convicted on the death penalty.

This is wild and a good series

God bless any kids they have


Would hope they have the Menendez kids..,

These jurors make my skin crawl.

This wasn't a joke.

quote:

---

Made concrete anchors out of quickreet and buckets in his garage

---

I thought this fell under what we call today as "fake news".
It was somewhat agreed that he made a homemade anchor for his boat and dumped the extra concrete mix by his driveway. It could not be proven that he fabricated more than just the one anchor. Plus, couldn't an anchor be found at the bottom of SF Bay?

quote:

---

Went fishing for "sturgeon" with a light spin casting rod and no bait

---

I don't know enough about fishing to comment on this, but I believe this was the first time Scott took the boat out after he bought it from some other guy.

quote:

---

Can't seem to find the tarp and rope that he bought the week before

---

Don't know about this.

Of course he did it...piece of shite homo is right where he belongs now.

quote:

---

Who hasn't gone fishing on Christmas Eve or Christmas Day?

---

The one thing that seemed strange to me was that he took the boat 90 miles each way to go fishing for about an hour total. Plus it was his first time out on the boat since he had just bought it used from someone else.

quote:

---

Man if anyone watches this a&e series, Def putting doubt in my mind that Scott did this or should have been convicted on the death penalty.

This is wild and a good series

---

Unless the series just completely left out some seriously damning evidence against him, I don't understand how anyone can say with definitive proof that he did this. I'm not saying he didn't do it, I'm saying the prosecution did not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he did.

The complete lack of any forensic evidence.

The multiple, seemingly intentional, investigative mishaps by the police.

'Laci didn't know about the boat and had never been to his office.' Business neighbor says Laci was at the business recently and even used their bathroom.

The burglary across the street that was never investigated.

The multiple witnesses claiming to have seen her with the dog that morning.

The prosecution's dec 23 theory being blown to pieces. Actually, most of the prosecution's theories being blown to pieces.

The ridiculous tracker dog thing that got blown up by the defense, but a juror still admitted factored in her decision.

And above all else, the obviously biased, vindictive jury members.

As far as I can tell, he was convicted because he 'didn't behave properly' after her disappearance, the amber Frey thing, and the body being found where he was fishing.

People grieve and deal with emotions in different ways, including the stoic, unfazed way Peterson did. Is it a weird way to respond to that situation? Yes. Is that the way I would've handled the situation? Haven't been there, but I don't think so. Does it prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt? Hell no. He's obviously a massive sociopath, to me it would be just as weird for him to be balling his eyes out on TV every night, especially after hearing how easily and convincingly he lied about the Europe trip.

The Frey thing proves he's a terrible person, no doubt. But again, it doesn't prove he killed his wife. Are we now to assume that everyone that cheats on their spouse is a murderer?

The body showing up where he fished is the only thing even remotely resembling physical evidence that he did it, according to the show. How is it any more plausible to believe that Scott was thorough enough to not leave ANY physical evidence behind and plant plenty of seeds of doubt, and then dumb enough to dump the body exactly where he told everyone he was that morning? Is it not just as plausible that someone else killed her, turned on a TV just one time in the weeks that passed between when the story broke and when the body was found to hear that Scott was fishing at that marina, and then moved the body to dump it there?

If there is a smoking gun here that was not included in the show please let me know. If not, I really don't understand how someone can watch that show and come away thinking something other than Peterson was not proven guilty, but still found guilty by a collaboration of an incompetent, lazy police department that developed a theory and selected evidence to prove only that theory, a blood thirsty national media set on railroading him from the beginning, and a biased, vindictive jury that has their minds made up from the beginning and never considered the facts of the case as presented by both the defense and prosecution.

I would also add that the local media members and legal experts that were on the show all seemed to agree with the above assessment, more or less.

Also, regardless of your thoughts on the case, one thing everyone that watched the show should be able to agree with is that Nancy Grace is a massive count and one of the worst human beings on the planet. For this lawyer turned "journalist" to proudly declare she was SCARED the really good defense attorney she knew would get a not guilty verdict or hung jury is a disgrace to both of those professions. And the way she handled the entire extra concrete used to fill in holes by the driveway situation is incredibly appalling.

quote:

---

Similar to JonBenet Ramsey.

---

Was definitely that crazy brother.