- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

Science: younger siblings have lower IQs than the oldest sibling
Posted on 4/11/19 at 9:47 am
Posted on 4/11/19 at 9:47 am
LINK
1st Born Swag
Corroborated bitches
1st Born Swag
quote:
Being the only child can have its advantages, but being the oldest could have even more. A study published in the Journal of Human Resources suggests that firstborn children are set up for more academic and intellectual success.
The findings of the study are based on theChildren of the National Longitudinal Survey of the Youth, which includes information of thousands of Americans between the ages of 14 and 21. Each participant was first interviewed in 1979 and re-interviewed since then. The data provides information on employment, income, education and other background information
quote:
Firstborn tend to be more confident about themselves, particularly their academic performance, according to the study.
A previous study shows that younger siblings have a lower IQ compared to the oldest sibling and tend to perform poorly in school.
Corroborated bitches
Posted on 4/11/19 at 9:49 am to Kujo
Youngest of 11 checking in...
Explains a lot.
Explains a lot.
Posted on 4/11/19 at 9:49 am to Kujo
Wish my little sister was still around for me to rub this in

Posted on 4/11/19 at 9:49 am to Kujo
Parenting gets worse with the 2nd child.
So can we assume the youngest child in any family is the dumbest of all the kids?
So can we assume the youngest child in any family is the dumbest of all the kids?
Posted on 4/11/19 at 9:50 am to Kujo
Sheldon Cooper says "hello"...just sayins
Posted on 4/11/19 at 9:51 am to tiggerthetooth
quote:
So can we assume the youngest child in any family is the dumbest of all the kids?
and the gayest
quote:
The more older brothers a boy has, the more likely he is to be gay when he grows up – an effect called the “fraternal birth order effect”. Now it seems that increasing levels of antibodies in a mother’s immune system could play a role.
LINK
Posted on 4/11/19 at 9:52 am to Kujo
Likely due to the fact that the oldest get undivided attention in those critical early developmental years while the younger sibling does not.
I'm the oldest, so I support these findings.
I'm the oldest, so I support these findings.
Posted on 4/11/19 at 9:52 am to Kujo
Another hit piece to get the population to stop having kids after #1.
Posted on 4/11/19 at 9:53 am to Kujo
quote:
more older brothers a boy has, the more likely he is to be gay
Hits keep coming. I've got 4 older brothers on top of being the last of the line. Suppose I'm doomed.
Posted on 4/11/19 at 9:54 am to Kujo
As a younger sibling, I would agree.
Posted on 4/11/19 at 9:54 am to Kujo
Definitely not the case in my house growing up....
Posted on 4/11/19 at 9:55 am to The Last Coco
quote:
Hits keep coming. I've got 4 older brothers on top of being the last of the line. Suppose I'm doomed.
Gay retards have value too man.
Posted on 4/11/19 at 9:56 am to ithad2bme
quote:
Likely due to the fact that the oldest get undivided attention in those critical early developmental years while the younger sibling does not. I'm the oldest, so I support these findings.
just the opposite in my family, I'm right in the middle but when I was young, my parents were busting arse, working a couple of jobs each to try to get their business going, after it was thriving and they were pretty comfortable, while still very busy, they had more time for the youngest kids, not saying we were slighted, at all, just more time spent with the youngest, and they are lowest achievers out of the bunch
Posted on 4/11/19 at 9:56 am to statman34
quote:
Another hit piece to get the population to stop having kids after #1.
Based on the logic of their findings the larger a family the dumber the youngest kid will be. So dont have more kids or else theyll be weak and dumb.
Posted on 4/11/19 at 9:56 am to Kujo
It would be interesting to compare mine.
Both straight A students their whole lives (with Honors and AP classes in HS). One is a savant with Math and Science The other is equally great in English and Social Sciences.
My guess is the Math/Science kid would perform better on the IQ test, even through they are both extremely intelligent.
Both straight A students their whole lives (with Honors and AP classes in HS). One is a savant with Math and Science The other is equally great in English and Social Sciences.
My guess is the Math/Science kid would perform better on the IQ test, even through they are both extremely intelligent.
Posted on 4/11/19 at 9:56 am to Displaced
quote:
Strange, she is here with me trying to rub one out. What do you want me to tell her?
Pretty sure he was saying she has passed away. As in she is dead. Way to go a-hole.
Posted on 4/11/19 at 9:58 am to Kujo
My older sister has known this for my whole life.
Posted on 4/11/19 at 9:59 am to statman34
quote:
Another hit piece to get the population to stop having kids after #1.
Nothing wrong with that. The world is overrun with idiots already.
Posted on 4/11/19 at 10:01 am to Kujo
IQ tests are being proven to be fundamentally flawed though, so the study itself is flawed. Doubly so using old IQ concepts from the 70s and 80s.
Posted on 4/11/19 at 10:02 am to Athos
Sorry you tested so low, man.
Popular
Back to top


32










