re: science paper -Estimating Flight Characteristics of Anomalous Unidentified Aerial Vehicles

quote:

---

Preprints aren't peer reviewed

---

Another dismissive insufferable...

Cognitive dissonance folks...

Good companion piece to yd’s video about the Tic Tacs being Air Force tech

Below delves into the material science that may have helped derive the “weightless” properties. These themes are in the TTSA/Army contract

Check out the origin of the materials. It invokes thoughts of ours vs theirs (and reverse engineering...)

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=l4NO_mIPwps

quote:

---

Metamaterials, To The Stars, and the Army
648 views 84 4 Share Save Report Red Panda Koala 1.31K subscribers
SUBSCRIBE
Published on Nov 5, 2019

In October of 2019 the US Army announced a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement with To The Stars to research alleged metamaterials retrieved from crashed UFOs. This video goes over the history of the metamaterials and details the agreement between the Army and To The Stars.

---

Tom Delonge was right!

https://silvarecord.com/2019/11/15/these-people-claim-ufo-artifacts-are-held-by-the-government-and-or-contractors/

quote:

---

These People Claim UFO Artifacts are Held by the Government and/or Contractors

NOVEMBER 15, 2019

---

quote:

---

So much has been talked about Metamaterials. Metamaterials can be in the form of UFO pieces, UFO debris, technological hardware and theoretically not excluding even implants (in bodies) and whole craft. To the Stars Academy of Arts and Science (TTSA), Jacques Vallee and others claim to possess samples, or at the least, are testing samples to see if they are authentic and anomalous. Dr. Garry Nolan, who used to work with TTSA and also works with Jacques Vallee coined the term Metamaterials to be used in this regard. (There are other definitions of metamaterials that don’t have anything to do with the UFO phenomenon.) Dr. Nolan now says a more accurate term is Ultramaterials. However, the Metamaterials term seems to have stuck.

Many people claim the government and/or contractors, Independent Research and Development activities (IRADs), Special Access Programs (SAPs), Unacknowledged Special Access Programs (USAPs) and other groups possess artifacts. With so many claims of this being the case, and now since the Army is interested in TTSA’s research, the legitimization of Metamaterials studies, and possibly even proof, could be right around the corner. Since TTSA has now entered a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement (CRADA) with the United States Army, they could be eligible for this list, however I will focus on others for now.

---

quote:

---

Dr. Davis seems to also buy into at least some aspects of the Col. Philip Corso story. That story may have been embellished over time, but nonetheless parts of it may be true. Speaking about Corso, Dr. Davis said this

“(Corso’s) job as a civilian was to handle the crash retrieval materials and assign them out to the various defense contractors for analysis and reverse engineering study. And so that proved out to be true. And so it’s there. And there have been several other crash retrievals that have happened.”

:

---

For those not familiar, Corso claims that some of the technology responsible for computers (integrated circuits and fiber optics) are derived from “others” tech...

Roswell crash happened in 1947:

quote:

---

DeLonge: But I know that there were, and I was told, that there were crashES. And we took that… probably got pretty freaked out, pretty scared. We scurried it away, created what they call a “pick up game” of counter intelligence to keep people away from asking hard questions that we didn’t know the answers to, and we created this crash program much bigger than the Manhattan Project, much bigger than Apollo, to figure out how this stuff worked and how to build our own defense system against it should there be more. And I find that just absolutely fascinating.

Knapp: Is it…can you say, is it within government? Is whatever we have in the purview of government or is it outside or a little bit of both? I mean, there are people in government that know, but a lot of people, or at least some of the key players, are outside the framework of government?

Delonge: I believe that it is absolutely in government, but I do believe that a lot of this exists in clever ways. I’m not totally sure if it’s to keep the secret, probably, but I think it’s also to make sure that we get the world’s best and brightest talent working on it. When we first starting having… when we first found the vehicles I know we brought in private industry, military, intelligence…a good diverse group of very very elevated thinkers and said, “How do we handle this?” I know a lot of private industry got deeply involved because that’s where the talent pool was. And those companies working on those things fall under the department of defense and have to operate like government, but its still under a private corporation where certain laws protect their own breakthroughs and proprietary assets. So, I know in my dealings with the advisors that when I asked them…I asked a question very specifically. I said, you know, “Do we…is it legal to be working on this advanced machinery the way you guys are? Or does national security dictate you being able to do whatever you want to do to get the job done?” I wasn’t being disrespectful. I wasn’t saying, “Are you doing something illegal?” It was very clear what they were trying to achieve when the response I got was the exact law, the exact number and the exact paragraph on the government website. I was being pointed to the very specific text of which these national security departments operate under

Knapp: The implication in that sentence is that we got technology from somewhere else, you can call it alien, it’s not ours, foreign. We’ve got technology and we’re trying to figure out how it works and how to defend against it?

DeLonge: Yeah. That’s exactly what’s going on. It’s crazy to believe, it’s super hard to digest, but that’s exactly what’s going on, yeah.

.

---

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=oHBWvRhIFMw&list=PLV8fVZIYP-YNNTDk982riGSNUWjIm1oE1&index=1

Remember that these interview were from 2016 (before The NY Times story broke)...
Delonge comes across as sincere in the interviews

We may have crazy advanced tech that is “our” and “theirs”...

quote:

---

tin foil trash

---

Watch the YouTube link

The tin foil meme is/was part of the process of protecting the public. Seed the public with info (that is in part true), while also dismissing and ridiculing it. It serves the purpose of presenting controversial information while limiting fear/chaos. It is remarkably effective psychological conditioning (as you proved my point...)

You should care about this stuff

The world is getting ready to change. Buckle up...

quote:

---

So the craft would have to have some sort of inertial dampener to offset such a short time to relativistic speeds, correct?

---

Thats the general idea. Popular theory bases UFOs ability to move at these speeds being in part due to their ability to get around inertia. So "Intertial dampeners" (in whatever form they may take) are inferred to being used.

Now, if they literally dampen the objects inertia or use some method of movement that defies that physical law.. who knows.

Is somebody forcing your sorry, lowlife, junkie arse to click on this thread? No..? Then stfu.