- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Rutgers professor says "we got to take these motherf**kers out" regarding white people
Posted on 10/29/21 at 11:48 am to The Spleen
Posted on 10/29/21 at 11:48 am to The Spleen
quote:
but more a recognition that there are fringe beliefs and movements on both ends of the spectrum.
Except you just didn’t say that. You said they were becoming mainstream. That’s something pride addressed. You also said they’re building up to a conflict presumably because you believe it’s becoming more mainstream.
Posted on 10/29/21 at 11:49 am to The Spleen
quote:
No, I never claimed that. I said there are fringe right characters out there fanning the flames of culture war. I never made a direct comparison to her comments, which I also labeled fringe.
Dude. Might want to stop digging before you reach China.....Just a suggestion.
Posted on 10/29/21 at 11:51 am to upgrayedd
quote:
Why do yall always act as if gerrymandering is some sort of monopolistic right wing endeavor?
Not sure where I've done that, but in the context of the discussion I think this example is germane. There's been teeth gnashing on the right of Texas going blue. One factor in that would be the political power of the black vote in Texas, so they gerrymander their districts to essentially negate any political power that population might gain.
Posted on 10/29/21 at 11:51 am to c on z
quote:
When Black people became politicians and experienced some economic prosperity during Reconstruction, it began to get negated as a result of the Great Compromise of 1877 where federal troops were removed from Southern states as part of the deal to have Rutherford B Hayes president when he lost the election. The Jim Crow era began to take shape as a result.
And here you are 140 years later supporting the political party that did it. Feel stupid yet? Well, you should.
Posted on 10/29/21 at 11:51 am to c on z
quote:
That is not what was suggested.
That's exactly what's being suggested and it's regurgitated ad nauseum by the left constantly.
quote:
Democrats for example in the state legislature in Illinois when they had their maps set up gerrymandered Kizinger’s district to where he could lose reelection. Thing is when Republicans control the majority of the state legislatures and governors’ mansions across the country and are performing the same practice with their respective maps, I honestly wouldn’t get mad at Democrats doing the same thing to attempt to maintain what power they have.
Again, you phrase this as if it's some sort of Republican tactic that the Democrats are being forced to use just so they don't get eliminated. It's complete nonsense. Playing the victim just comes so naturally to you idiots.
Posted on 10/29/21 at 11:53 am to The Spleen
quote:but they do it on "BoTH sIdES" huurrrrrrr
We can talk about the current Texas redistricting maps that just passed.
why don't you apply your above-the-fray logic to this gotcha attempt? you're just a middle of the road centrist that sees both sides for how terrible they are, after all.
Posted on 10/29/21 at 11:54 am to The Spleen
quote:
Not sure where I've done that, but in the context of the discussion I think this example is germane. There's been teeth gnashing on the right of Texas going blue. One factor in that would be the political power of the black vote in Texas, so they gerrymander their districts to essentially negate any political power that population might gain.
Blacks are 11% of the population in TX, so they already don't have much political power.
If there's any reason why TX goes blue, it'll be because of white liberals and Hispanics.
Posted on 10/29/21 at 11:55 am to The Spleen
quote:
I think this example is germane.
quote:
Rutgers professor says "we got to take these motherf**kers out" regarding white people
yea bro. germane AF.
OP is talking about a racist professor at Rutgers. you're talking about gerrymandering in Texas.
hey, remember just last night when you were trying to equate outrage over dick sucking children's books to the cancelling of Dr. Suess? this is about as ridiculous.
This post was edited on 10/29/21 at 11:56 am
Posted on 10/29/21 at 11:58 am to VolsOut4Harambe
Can't believe this woman of great discipline and self control could have said such a vile thing.
Posted on 10/29/21 at 11:59 am to Logician
quote:
yea bro. germane AF.
OP is talking about a racist professor at Rutgers. you're talking about gerrymandering in Texas.
The discussion I was talking about was the one of how there's usually a backlash against black gaining any footing in society. It's pretty normal for a thread that goes 10+ pages for discussions to shift from the OP topic. Is your handle meant to be ironic?
Posted on 10/29/21 at 12:01 pm to The Spleen
quote:
The discussion I was talking about was the one of how there's usually a backlash against black gaining any footing in society.
Dude, you are so goddamn disingenuous. It's really no wonder your wife fricks other guys.
Posted on 10/29/21 at 12:02 pm to lsupride87
quote:
They are employed and preach through the media
You have to go to cellar dwelling completely ostracized groups to get the equivalent flame fanners on the right
Exactly right. The extreme Left is the media and academia.
The extreme Right is living in a trailer in Livingston Parish or po-dunk Oklahoma and surviving by selling junk metal.
Posted on 10/29/21 at 12:02 pm to 1BamaRTR
quote:
You said they were becoming mainstream.
I did, but that was meant more as a flippant comment that the anti-CRT rhetoric was maybe already mainstream and no longer fringe. It wasn't a direct comparison to anything really, but if you took it that way then that's fine. I can see how it maybe wasn't clear.
Posted on 10/29/21 at 12:03 pm to VolsOut4Harambe
It'd be great if we could give her COVID and just see if she could survive it.
Posted on 10/29/21 at 12:03 pm to VolsOut4Harambe
quote:
Like, the thing I want to say to you is we got to take these motherf---kers out. But, like, we can't say that, right? We can't say, like, I don't believe in a project of violence. I truly don't," Cooper said.
She sounds intelligent. (Professor Cooper, that means smart)
quote:
She added that "Whiteness is going to have an end date, because despite what White people think of themselves, they do not defy the laws of eternity."
"But Whiteness is largely an, you know, an inconvenient interruption," Cooper said.
Then my that line of thinking, so is blackness, asian-ness, and South American-ness.
quote:
quote: "I said what I meant. And I curse cuz I'm grown," Cooper wrote in a tweet thread. "I have tenure. Rutgers won't be firing me for tweets."
Tenure should be eradicated if this is why it’s protecting.
Posted on 10/29/21 at 12:05 pm to The Spleen
quote:
The discussion I was talking about was the one of how there's usually a backlash against black gaining any footing in society
By whom?
Posted on 10/29/21 at 12:06 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
Dude, you are so goddamn disingenuous
Says the guy that's been engaging in that very discussion.
Posted on 10/29/21 at 12:06 pm to VolsOut4Harambe
And people wonder why racism won’t die….it’s shite like this that makes people have an inkling racism
Posted on 10/29/21 at 12:06 pm to upgrayedd
Democrats good. Democrats love. Democrats life.
Posted on 10/29/21 at 12:08 pm to The Spleen
quote:
Says the guy that's been engaging in that very discussion.
The spleen believes in so much that isn't so
Popular
Back to top



1







