- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Rush Limbaugh thinks evolution is a hoax because gorilla never became human
Posted on 6/2/16 at 12:47 pm to tuptiger
Posted on 6/2/16 at 12:47 pm to tuptiger
No, you claimed that the function of an eye is too complex to start out rudimentarily. He demonstrated that isn't accurate. He demonstrated the beginning stepping stones of where it would have started before increasing complication.
I can't believe this shite is still going.
I can't believe this shite is still going.
2
Posted on 6/2/16 at 12:48 pm to CorporateTiger
No. He didn't just appeal to authority using the word "we".
Posted on 6/2/16 at 12:48 pm to thegreatboudini
What is the definition of a scientist? One who crusades through theories with the assumption there is no creator?
I thought you were supposed to be openminded.... Do you even know what I refer to?
The fall of Jericho was prophesied wayyyy before it fell. It fell exactly as was prophesied. It is indisputable.
Now, find me another holy text of any religion that can match that.
I thought you were supposed to be openminded.... Do you even know what I refer to?
The fall of Jericho was prophesied wayyyy before it fell. It fell exactly as was prophesied. It is indisputable.
Now, find me another holy text of any religion that can match that.
Posted on 6/2/16 at 12:48 pm to Peazey
quote:
I can't believe this shite is still going.
You've been here long enough pectus
Posted on 6/2/16 at 12:48 pm to BigEdLSU
You are citing a bible chapter that involves involves
As "irrefutable" prophecy?
quote:
ike a lion, and had eagle's wings: I beheld till the wings thereof were plucked, and it was lifted up from the earth, and made stand upon the feet as a man, and a man's heart was given to it.
5 And behold another beast, a second, like to a bear, and it raised up itself on one side, and it had three ribs in the mouth of it between the teeth of it: and they said thus unto it, Arise, devour much flesh.
6 After this I beheld, and lo another, like a leopard, which had upon the back of it four wings of a fowl; the beast had also four heads; and dominion was given to it.
7 After this I saw in the night visions, and behold a fourth beast, dreadful and terrible, and strong exceedingly; and it had great iron teeth: it devoured and brake in pieces, and stamped the residue with the feet of it: and it was diverse from all the beasts that were before it; and it had ten horns.
As "irrefutable" prophecy?
Posted on 6/2/16 at 12:49 pm to tuptiger
I just showed how each step is incrementally more advantageous than the previous.
Try doing actual research instead of googling "how do I disprove evolution".
Took 10 seconds to find this:
Try doing actual research instead of googling "how do I disprove evolution".
Took 10 seconds to find this:
Posted on 6/2/16 at 12:49 pm to CorporateTiger
You quoted scripture referring to end times and the rise of the anti-Christ.
I believe these things are happening.
I believe these things are happening.
Posted on 6/2/16 at 12:49 pm to Peazey
quote:
Irreducible complexity (IC) is a pseudoscientific argument that certain biological systems cannot evolve by successive small modifications to pre-existing functional systems through natural selection.
Im not googling how to disprove evolution. You used the anatomy of the eye to answer a question that largely pertains to the origin of the eye.
This post was edited on 6/2/16 at 12:51 pm
Posted on 6/2/16 at 12:49 pm to tuptiger
So if I changed that to "scientists" or "humanity" you would have no issues? Great way to debate the issues.
Posted on 6/2/16 at 12:50 pm to TheIndulger
Don't call me pectus.
Posted on 6/2/16 at 12:51 pm to BigEdLSU
You believing in something happening and it being "irrefutable" are so wildly different that I can't even begin to explain how wrong you are about this.
Instead I will just be waiting for the Eagle-Lion hybrid to evolve.
Instead I will just be waiting for the Eagle-Lion hybrid to evolve.
Posted on 6/2/16 at 12:51 pm to tuptiger
quote:
Irreducible complexity (IC) is a pseudoscientific argument that certain biological systems cannot evolve by successive small modifications to pre-existing functional systems through natural selection.
And he demonstrated that this pseudo bull shite idea does not apply as you claim. He demonstrated the possible incremental steps. frick!
He didn't describe the anatomy of the eye. He described the simple rudimentary first step that your position asserts doesn't exist. Come on. It's clear as day. You have to be purposely doing this.
This post was edited on 6/2/16 at 12:54 pm
Posted on 6/2/16 at 12:51 pm to thegreatboudini
quote:We'd probably have at least mastered our solar system by now and would likely have figured out a efficient way to travel throughout our galaxy
Oh my again. As a scientist who weights certainties and doubts via the scientific method on a daily bases, it hurts my brain to read things like this.
If people wanted a photo with Neil Degreasse Tyson as much as they wanted one with the Pope, we would be light years ahead of where we are now.
Posted on 6/2/16 at 12:52 pm to thegreatboudini
quote:
If people wanted a photo with Neil Degreasse Tyson as much as they wanted one with the Pope, we would be light years ahead of where we are now.
I get your analogy, but the Catholic Church has actually helped to advance science in areas like physics and genetics. Posted on 6/2/16 at 12:53 pm to Peazey
I like how brosef pulled a Wikipedia quote that called the theory pseudoscientific as a way to explain what answer he wanted.
Posted on 6/2/16 at 12:53 pm to BigEdLSU
Yes, a god singly handly placed 40BCF of gas in a 26' quartz rich Miocene sand, and god sent me, only me, to retrieve it.
Hallelujah.
Hallelujah.
Posted on 6/2/16 at 12:54 pm to CorporateTiger
I know it can be difficult to discuss two things at once. Let me simplify the statement.
First, regarding Jericho, it was prophesied and happened. It is irrefutable. You can choose to ignore it but you cannot argue it happening.
Second, I pointed out other prophesies referring to end times. You have quoted the end times prophesy as if that was the Jericho one.
Get it together.
First, regarding Jericho, it was prophesied and happened. It is irrefutable. You can choose to ignore it but you cannot argue it happening.
Second, I pointed out other prophesies referring to end times. You have quoted the end times prophesy as if that was the Jericho one.
Get it together.
Posted on 6/2/16 at 12:54 pm to Bmath
quote:The catholic church has, but no the bible thumping rednecks throughout the south with the whopping average IQ of 85 sure as hell didn't
I get your analogy, but the Catholic Church has actually helped to advance science in areas like physics and genetics.
Posted on 6/2/16 at 12:54 pm to BigEdLSU
quote:
Look, the bible has undisputible verified prophesy. I don't really care what your science teacher taught you. Study the fall of Jericho. Checkmate.
BigEd...I'm sorry, but your comments in this thread are horrifying to me
Posted on 6/2/16 at 12:55 pm to BigEdLSU
quote:
One who crusades through theories with the assumption there is no creator?
That's your assumption, and the lie that you tell yourself that makes you unreasonable and immune to discussion.
Page 26 of 31
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News