- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Rush Limbaugh thinks evolution is a hoax because gorilla never became human
Posted on 6/2/16 at 12:16 pm to OMLandshark
Posted on 6/2/16 at 12:16 pm to OMLandshark
That's what I am saying? You have to deny reality to believe evolution (on a grand scale) is not real.
That may be independent in your belief in an "invisible hand," but that hand is completely outside of science.
That may be independent in your belief in an "invisible hand," but that hand is completely outside of science.
This post was edited on 6/2/16 at 12:17 pm
1
Posted on 6/2/16 at 12:17 pm to OMLandshark
You're still at it. What a toolbag.
This man has all the answers. He posts the pic of a dog as his go to move.
I'm setting the over-under on this guy's age at 15.
We're now at the point of group think. Very scientific of you.
This man has all the answers. He posts the pic of a dog as his go to move.
I'm setting the over-under on this guy's age at 15.
We're now at the point of group think. Very scientific of you.
Posted on 6/2/16 at 12:20 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
Indoctrinated? Who's the indoctrinated one: the man that keeps testing his theories and asking questions,
Lol! This is hilarious to me..but a typical tactic from a mind-numbed robot like yourself. C'mon man..."test your theories"?!? You act like you're so enlightened, so open minded but yet you refuse to even entertain the very thought of intelligent design & you attempt to put down people who believe differently than you. That's sad.
Posted on 6/2/16 at 12:20 pm to CorporateTiger
quote:
That's what I am saying? You have to deny reality to believe evolution (on a grand scale) is not real.
I think I made that quite clear. Is English your second language?
Posted on 6/2/16 at 12:20 pm to tuptiger
No we are at the point of people who believe in evolution posting actual facts and data while the deniers continue to spout straw men and ignorance.
Posted on 6/2/16 at 12:21 pm to OMLandshark
Yes, I am trying to figure out why you got chippy about a post saying the same thing as you.
Posted on 6/2/16 at 12:21 pm to OMLandshark
He must be a "mental midget".
Posted on 6/2/16 at 12:23 pm to CorporateTiger
What do you think about irreducible complexity and the eye? Or irreducible complexity and the ribosome?
Posted on 6/2/16 at 12:24 pm to CorporateTiger
Because OMLandShark is home for the summer from high school.
Posted on 6/2/16 at 12:24 pm to CorporateTiger
quote:
What truth in it? There is no shred of physical evidence of a creator.
The notion that "absence of evidence is evidence of absence" is a logical fallacy.
Posted on 6/2/16 at 12:24 pm to tuptiger
You were the one asking for help understanding evolution a few pages back. But then you didn't get the answers you wanted.
Or (far more likely) you just wanted to get into a debate so you could show everyone how religious you are. Well now you can tell your youth group how you fought the good fight.
"Look at me, Jesus! I'm still denying evidence for evolution in 2016! Surely that will get me into heaven."
Or (far more likely) you just wanted to get into a debate so you could show everyone how religious you are. Well now you can tell your youth group how you fought the good fight.
"Look at me, Jesus! I'm still denying evidence for evolution in 2016! Surely that will get me into heaven."
Posted on 6/2/16 at 12:24 pm to tuptiger
Irreducible complexity is the new way of saying intelligent design.
Same thing, different name.
Same thing, different name.
Posted on 6/2/16 at 12:27 pm to AUveritas
I never said there was evidence of absence. I'm saying that the "truth" that poster asserted doesn't exist. A truth is generally supported by at least some evidence, we have none in regards to a creator.
Posted on 6/2/16 at 12:29 pm to Pectus
No. Just no.
LINK
quote:
If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed, which could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely break down. But I can find no such case.
LINK
This post was edited on 6/2/16 at 12:29 pm
Posted on 6/2/16 at 12:29 pm to tuptiger
quote:
Because OMLandShark is home for the summer from high school.
Wow, first "I fricked your mom" zinger, and now "duh you're 15". What's next? "I know you are but what am I?" Simply a bottom feeders argument.
Posted on 6/2/16 at 12:29 pm to tuptiger
quote:
Because OMLandShark is home for the summer from high school
High school jokes? Come on, man.
Posted on 6/2/16 at 12:30 pm to tuptiger
There is no irreducible complexity to either structure. We can look at the elements of the eye and even see more rudimentary forms of the eye with gradual increases in complexity.
Further, we have conducted excitements that prove that incredibly complex patterns can (and will) form even in the absence of a guiding force. Complexity does not prove there is something guiding it.
Further, we have conducted excitements that prove that incredibly complex patterns can (and will) form even in the absence of a guiding force. Complexity does not prove there is something guiding it.
Posted on 6/2/16 at 12:30 pm to dbeck
Very academic of you to presume that because I don't necessarily accept macroscale evolution that I must be religious.
Posted on 6/2/16 at 12:32 pm to Enadious
A simple way that I look at is like the Matrix. We may very well be in a simulation and evolution and all science is programmed in. God himself is the programmer.
Page 24 of 31
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News