Started By
Message

re: Rolex Submariner or Omega Seamaster?

Posted on 8/23/21 at 12:41 pm to
Posted by bbarras85
Member since Jul 2021
2337 posts
Posted on 8/23/21 at 12:41 pm to
I prefer the luxurious apple watch. Non cellular model. I'm no chump.
Posted by El Magnifico
La casa de tu mamá
Member since Jan 2014
7017 posts
Posted on 8/23/21 at 1:14 pm to
Omega
Posted by Rendevoustavern
Member since May 2018
1794 posts
Posted on 8/23/21 at 3:35 pm to
I tried this watch on before going with WG. I don’t think I could pull off the rose/yellow gold. It also looked a little small on my wrist as compared to the 42.
This post was edited on 8/23/21 at 3:36 pm
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
104369 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 2:17 am to
The more I look at it I really like the speedmaster moon watch
Posted by TexasTiger89
Houston, TX
Member since Feb 2005
26440 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 4:01 am to
Omega
Posted by CharlesLSU
Member since Jan 2007
33251 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 5:51 am to
I have both

Granted my seamaster is the Planet Ocean chrono (orange bezel/dark grey dial).

They are both good but I do prefer the Omega as it’s MUCH heavier and the bracelet is money with the fine adjustment button.

What’s crazy is the Omega was $9300 in February but my sub was appraised a month ago at $10500 (bought in 1996).
This post was edited on 8/24/21 at 5:55 am
Posted by Newc
Member since Feb 2017
391 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 7:54 am to
I think the speed master moon watch is perhaps the best watch for the money - particularly the newest incarnation. It is an unbelievable watch, with a great design. Never get tired of my 1861 (the hesalite version).
Posted by Alt26
Member since Mar 2010
34153 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 8:33 am to
quote:

I think the speed master moon watch is perhaps the best watch for the money - particularly the newest incarnation. It is an unbelievable watch, with a great design. Never get tired of my 1861 (the hesalite version).



I think it is a GREAT watch. But I don't think I'd say it is the best watch for the money. First, it's fully manual (not self winding). It's not like it is an arduous task to have to wind the watch every day. But it can be a bit of a pain if you don't wear the watch every day. Second, while the new movement is much better, the older movement(s), while classic, are somewhat outdated relative to other movements Omega offers. Third, I know hesalite is more authentic. But you can get Seamasters for less $$ that come with sapphire crystals.

Point being, IMO you can get better (mechanically) Omega watches for less than the moonwatch. Especially in the Seamaster line. With the moonwatch you are paying more for the tradition and history.

ALL of that said, I could see a day where the moonwatch will be part of my lineup. Hell, I thought long and hard about it when I ultimately decided to buy a Seamaster last year.
Posted by pressurized
Member since Aug 2013
595 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 8:54 am to
I have a '71 Submariner from my father that I only wear for special occasions, but never realized the prices of the watch market.

Apparently I need to get that on my home owners insurance. I would never sell it, but just assumed it was worth a couple grand because of the name. Samsonite, I was way off.
Posted by billjamin
Houston
Member since Jun 2019
16714 posts
Posted on 8/24/21 at 9:30 am to
quote:

I have a '71 Submariner from my father that I only wear for special occasions, but never realized the prices of the watch market.

Apparently I need to get that on my home owners insurance. I would never sell it, but just assumed it was worth a couple grand because of the name. Samsonite, I was way off.

You should wear it more. Sitting isn't good for them. Or at least keep it in a winder. I wear my 82 16800 every day.

And yes get it on your policy You will probably need a it on its own or a special jewelry policy. Our jewelry max wasn't nearly high enough to cover it so we got a separate policy for all of that.
Posted by Newc
Member since Feb 2017
391 posts
Posted on 8/25/21 at 8:25 am to
I will concede one of your points: while I think the Omega Speedmaster is a great value, I think the new Seamaster, dollar-for-dollar, may be the best value in watches, period. The only other option that comes to mind is the BB58.

That said, I think your negative points are off base. First, the hand wound movement is great! It is a pleasure winding it every morning. And because it has no date, or anything like that, it only takes a couple minutes to set. Personally, I enjoy the engagement. (Then again, I generally prefer manual wound chronographs). Second, while the 8800 movement, with its co-axial escapement, is a fantastic invention, I am not sure it is any better or worse than the new movement in the 3861. It is more technically advanced, certainly. But I have always had an issue with how thick the 8800 movement is. Third, don't knock the hesalite! It adds a warm glow to the watch that the sapphire crystal just cannot replicate. Further, it is very easy to clean with polywatch, and it is very inexpensive to replace if you ever decide to do so.

I have a number of watches and, specifically, a number of watches far more expensive than the Speedmaster. However, the Speedmaster is the watch I reach for far more often than not. At this juncture, it is one of the only sports watch "icons" that you can actually purchase, and I think it may be the most aesthetically pleasing in the $10,000 and under range (I have a soft spot for the 5711/12 and 15202). While I would love a Daytona, I do think that the Speedmaster is objectively a more aesthetically pleasing watch.
Posted by barbapapa
Member since Mar 2018
3805 posts
Posted on 8/25/21 at 9:43 am to


Love my BB58
Posted by Newc
Member since Feb 2017
391 posts
Posted on 8/25/21 at 10:58 am to
That is a great looking watch.
Posted by highcotton2
Alabama
Member since Feb 2010
10358 posts
Posted on 8/25/21 at 12:09 pm to
quote:

have a '71 Submariner from my father that I only wear for special occasions, but never realized the prices of the watch market.


Is it a 5512, 5513 or a 1680?
Posted by Scooba
Member since Jun 2013
20006 posts
Posted on 8/25/21 at 1:26 pm to
I too have been torn between these for almost as long as this thread has been active.

Decided to re-read from the beginning. As of now:

OMEGA - 20 VOTES
ROLEX - 34 VOTES

OP bought the OMEGA.



It amazes me how many people assume watch enthusiasts are in it for the opinion of others. I'm also curious how many people couldn't fathom spending 8K on a watch but will gladly drive a new truck or SUV off the lot, losing that much value plus some.

My Vote - Omega

Posted by jflsufan
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Mar 2013
5010 posts
Posted on 8/25/21 at 2:02 pm to
quote:

Hope OP pulled the trigger on that Seamaster a couple years ago. Can’t find one now.


I sure did!

This post was edited on 8/25/21 at 2:52 pm
Posted by nobigdeal69
baton rouge
Member since Nov 2009
2262 posts
Posted on 8/25/21 at 2:06 pm to
quote:

I sure did!



mmmkay... judging by the picture you posted, you didn't go with the submariner.
Posted by VAvolfan
Member since Feb 2010
2368 posts
Posted on 8/25/21 at 6:34 pm to
Rolex for me
Posted by CSinLC
Member since May 2018
2085 posts
Posted on 8/25/21 at 7:57 pm to
Omega. Larger
Posted by Newc
Member since Feb 2017
391 posts
Posted on 8/25/21 at 8:34 pm to
Love that, although I prefer the white iteration by a smidge.

Maybe there should be an OT watch meetup.
Jump to page
Page First 16 17 18 19 20 ... 23
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 18 of 23Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram