- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 6/24/22 at 9:40 pm to Korkstand
quote:
Like Roe should have never passed muster but did so for 50 years?
Almost as bad as Plessy passing muster for 56.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 9:40 pm to Centinel
quote:There are likely many avenues.
And exactly how will this be done?
Pro-lifers think abortion is equivalent to murder. You think red states are going to let murderers go unpunished?
Posted on 6/24/22 at 9:41 pm to Hulkklogan
quote:
Y'all keep up the whataboutism strawmen as if I support those scenarios you're bringing up. I don't.
Says the idiot that just said, with complete seriousness, that millions of people will be forbidden from having an abortion and states are going to enact snitch laws to arrest people who go to other states to have an abortion
Posted on 6/24/22 at 9:41 pm to Hulkklogan
When cornered, always throw out the "whataboutism" quip.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 9:46 pm to Cosmo
40 down votes ,,, wow how uniformed !
Posted on 6/24/22 at 9:46 pm to beerJeep
quote:
Says the idiot that just said, with complete seriousness, that millions of people will be forbidden from having an abortion and states are going to enact snitch laws to arrest people who go to other states to have an abortion
I wasn't quite that certain about the 2nd part.
quote:
Until states try to enact bounty and/or snitch programs
And states will ban abortion. Do you believe red states won't do as much as they possibly can to prevent people from leaving the state to murder babies?
Suppose they don't or can't.. Sure, people with means may be able to travel and get an abortion, so then you only wanna punish poors. That's really what this country is missing, anti-poor legislation.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 9:48 pm to Hulkklogan
quote:
Do you believe red states won't do as much as they possibly can to prevent people from leaving the state to murder babies?
No, I don't. It's not that big of a deal. But for some reason it is to you....a dude. Weird.
You don't happen to worry about someone creampieing your 16 year old daughter do you?
Posted on 6/24/22 at 9:49 pm to TidenUP
quote:
When cornered, always throw out the "whataboutism" quip.
I don't know what else to call it if you are bringing up unrelated scenarios to the topic at hand.
In fact, if anything, you furthered the point that people in power will do what they can to control others, right or wrong.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 9:50 pm to Hulkklogan
quote:
That's really what this country is missing, anti-poor legislation.
Have you seen the fed programs for poor, inner city people in this country? Damn. You gotta be trolling.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 9:51 pm to Hulkklogan
quote:
wasn't quite that certain about the 2nd part.
The fact that you even think that is possible is laughable.
quote:
And states will ban abortion. Do you believe red states won't do as much as they possibly can to prevent people from leaving the state to murder babies?
They literally CANT do anything to stop someone from going to another state. Period. End of story.
quote:
Suppose they don't or can't.. Sure, people with means may be able to travel and get an abortion, so then you only wanna punish poors. That's really what this country is missing, anti-poor legislation.
Again, non profits will pay your tab if you can’t afford it. Multiple large corps have also stated the same.
People of ALL income levels will be able to get a safe abortion in the United States. That will not change.
Unclutch your pearls you little cuck.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 9:52 pm to beerJeep
quote:
Again, non profits will pay your tab if you can’t afford it. Multiple large corps have also stated the same.
People of ALL income levels will be able to get a safe abortion in the United States. That will not change.
Assume all of this is true. Why bother banning it at the state level?
Posted on 6/24/22 at 9:54 pm to Hulkklogan
quote:
Assume all of this is true. Why bother banning it at the state level?
Because the majority of a state may not support killing babies
Posted on 6/24/22 at 9:55 pm to Hulkklogan
quote:Because I don't want my money funding the genocide of children, much like how I don't want your precious freak show psycho drag queens in public libraries brain washing children with their mental illness.
Why bother banning it at the state level?
Posted on 6/24/22 at 9:55 pm to Hulkklogan
quote:
Assume all of this is true. Why bother banning it at the state level?
Sweet Jesus
Posted on 6/24/22 at 9:55 pm to Hulkklogan
quote:
Assume all of this is true.
There is no ASSUME, dude. It’s a mother fricking fact. I’m sorry that you are an emotional little peon that is incapable of understanding basic facts.
quote:
Why bother banning it at the state level?
Because that is how it is supposed to work. States are beholden to the people within them. If the people of state A want abortion banned, then so be it. If they don’t, then guess what? The laws will reflect it.
Amazing how the division of power works, eh?
Posted on 6/24/22 at 9:55 pm to Hulkklogan
quote:
Assume all of this is true. Why bother banning it at the state level?
Why ban anything at the state level then?
Posted on 6/24/22 at 10:06 pm to SoonerK
quote:
Thomas would almost certainly rule that the law was constitutional. Look at his dissent in Lawrence.
"Punishing someone for expressing his sexual preference through noncommercial consensual conduct with another adult does not appear to be a worthy way to expend valuable law enforcement"
sounds like he thought that the right to privacy doesn't exist in the constitution and that state governments would be stupid to pass such laws or keep them on the books. sounds reasonable.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 10:11 pm to gaetti15
quote:
"Punishing someone for expressing his sexual preference through noncommercial consensual conduct with another adult does not appear to be a worthy way to expend valuable law enforcement"
sounds like he thought that the right to privacy doesn't exist in the constitution and that state governments would be stupid to pass such laws or keep them on the books. sounds reasonable.
That is why I said Thomas would rule it constitutional for a state to ban sex outside of marriage.
Posted on 6/24/22 at 10:11 pm to beerJeep
quote:Is this one of the possible avenues of enforcement across state lines? How does this work for tax purposes and state benefit programs?
Again, non profits will pay your tab if you can’t afford it. Multiple large corps have also stated the same.
What kind of mess will health insurance be?
Page 58 of 64
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News