Started By
Message

re: RNA Researcher at Francis Crick Institute: "Pfizer Vaccine hurts immune system."

Posted on 7/22/21 at 9:34 am to
Posted by skullhawk
My house
Member since Nov 2007
23048 posts
Posted on 7/22/21 at 9:34 am to
Why are people wanting the vaccine to fail?

Do you know what this world is going to look like if this vaccine push doesn't work out?

I understand not wanting to take it for fear of side effects but it seems like many on here go beyond that and relish in the idea that the vaccine isn't offering some level of protection.
Posted by Bout_Dat_Lyfe
Member since Jan 2013
1969 posts
Posted on 7/22/21 at 9:36 am to
quote:

I can’t imagine how you function in life with this level of critical thought.
What does he say in the video? Exact quotes, since I'm taking things out of context and spreading misinformation...
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54134 posts
Posted on 7/22/21 at 9:37 am to
quote:

exact quotes


From the doctor in the op, with credentials you have already linked to support his expertise:

quote:

Summary: vaccine rollout has been a huge success in the UK – slow and steady has almost won the race, B.1.617.2 (delta) variant makes it a bit more uphill as we near the finish line... Two doses as quickly as supply allows, monitor Ab levels, boost those who need. 13/end
Posted by Bout_Dat_Lyfe
Member since Jan 2013
1969 posts
Posted on 7/22/21 at 9:38 am to
quote:

Why are people wanting the vaccine to fail? Do you know what this world is going to look like if this vaccine push doesn't work out? I understand not wanting to take it for fear of side effects but it seems like many on here go beyond that and relish in the idea that the vaccine isn't offering some level of protection.


It's not rooting for people to get hurt, It's just shoving the info in people's face to let them know they've been lied to and no establishment media being honest.
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54134 posts
Posted on 7/22/21 at 9:38 am to
quote:

Exact quotes, since I'm taking things out of context and spreading misinformation...



quote:

that is telling us that we are probably going to be needing to prioritize boosters for older, more vulnerable people


Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
36311 posts
Posted on 7/22/21 at 9:38 am to
quote:

Because I'm more scientific than you are.



Aren't you the moron who said that the mRNA vaccines were gene-editing, but couldn't describe the mechanism for that editing?
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115860 posts
Posted on 7/22/21 at 9:39 am to
quote:

to let them know they've been lied to


They haven't been.

You are a nutjob.
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54134 posts
Posted on 7/22/21 at 9:39 am to
quote:

no establishment media being honest.
But you and infowars are providing the truth here, right? Your quotation in the op title is accurate and properly attributed, correct?
Posted by Bout_Dat_Lyfe
Member since Jan 2013
1969 posts
Posted on 7/22/21 at 9:40 am to
Lol you're such a dishonest clown. I'll be back when more and more scientists get the balls to come forward about the dangers of the vaccine, but I'm sure you just commit more and more to the lie.
Posted by Jon Ham
Member since Jun 2011
28588 posts
Posted on 7/22/21 at 9:40 am to
If the government outlawed homosexuality you would be first in line at the gay bar that night.
Posted by Bout_Dat_Lyfe
Member since Jan 2013
1969 posts
Posted on 7/22/21 at 9:41 am to
I linked to multiple pub med articles explaining just that. Enjoy your compromised immune system.
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54134 posts
Posted on 7/22/21 at 9:42 am to
quote:

Lol you're such a dishonest clown.
One of us is.

quote:

I'll be back
Unfortunately, this is likely the most truthful thing you have said in this thread.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
36311 posts
Posted on 7/22/21 at 9:44 am to
quote:

I linked to multiple pub med articles explaining just that. Enjoy your compromised immune system.



You actually didn't, and you can't seem to understand why, because you need a few important things in order to modulate transcriptional activity. I'm asking you what you think those things are, because the articles you posted absolutely did not describe that mechanism. Not only that, the latest publications on gene therapy specifically exclude vaccinations from being considered gene editing, for good reason.
Posted by Bout_Dat_Lyfe
Member since Jan 2013
1969 posts
Posted on 7/22/21 at 9:46 am to
Which vaccine did you get?
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
36311 posts
Posted on 7/22/21 at 9:46 am to
Answer my questions first, and I'll answer yours.
Posted by LoveThatMoney
Who knows where?
Member since Jan 2008
12268 posts
Posted on 7/22/21 at 9:49 am to
quote:

If the government outlawed homosexuality you would be first in line at the gay bar that night.


:slowclap:
Posted by Bout_Dat_Lyfe
Member since Jan 2013
1969 posts
Posted on 7/22/21 at 9:50 am to
It has to be one of the MRNA vaccines, the way you defend them so much. I'm guessing Moderna. Did you know that the NIH claims joint ownership of Moderna's coronavirus vaccine?
Posted by dawgfan24348
Member since Oct 2011
49285 posts
Posted on 7/22/21 at 9:52 am to
My God just make it stop
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
36311 posts
Posted on 7/22/21 at 9:54 am to
Answer my question, and I'll answer yours. And it's good that the NIH has claimed ownership. There's been a remarkable amount of taxpayer funded research that has led to medications and technologies that are eventually privatized, with one example being the recombinant DNA technology that forms the backbone of modern biotech. It was one of the major criticisms of Fauci before COVID.
Posted by Ingeniero
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2013
18286 posts
Posted on 7/22/21 at 9:54 am to
Alright, retard, listen closely because this is my last effort post in your thread. The video clip you posted says nothing about a weakened immune system. The researcher is discussing the decay of antibodies effective against the Delta variant in older recipients. This has nothing to do with weakening the immune system, and he's actually arguing for MORE vaccines to boost the antibody levels of people that require it.

Here's the relevant excerpt from the study he worked on, published in the Lancet:

quote:

In the longer term, we note that both increased age and time since the second dose of BNT162b2 significantly correlate with decreased NAb activity against B.1.617.2 and B.1.351—both of which are also characteristic of the population in the UK at highest risk of severe COVID-19 (ie, older and vaccinated earlier), independent of other existing factors such as compromised immune status or comorbidity, or geographic-specific responses to vaccination.

Consequently, further booster immunisations of JCVI Priority Groups in the UK and similar groups in other counties, as well as others with lower vaccine-induced NAbTs than the cohort of BNT162b2 recipients studied here (ideally with modified vaccines that induce NAbs that broadly neutralise emerging VOCs) are more likely to be required to maintain the highest levels of NAbs in regions where B.1.617.2 or other equally NAb-resistant strains become prevalent.


I doubt you can read but here's a link to the full study:

LINK
This post was edited on 7/22/21 at 9:56 am
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram