- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Return to work at reduced hours vs staying on unemployment
Posted on 4/24/20 at 3:43 pm to LSU Coyote
Posted on 4/24/20 at 3:43 pm to LSU Coyote
quote:
Wait, Unemployment is $900 bucks?
In washington State it could be as much as 1300 a week with the federal add on.
Posted on 4/24/20 at 3:46 pm to jbgleason
That's a pretty messed up scenario. Employers should do better.
There's a difference between minimum wage bums not wanting to go back to work and hard workers being screwed out of fair pay.
There's a difference between minimum wage bums not wanting to go back to work and hard workers being screwed out of fair pay.
Posted on 4/24/20 at 3:48 pm to jcaz
quote:
There's a difference between minimum wage bums not wanting to go back to work and hard workers being screwed out of fair pay.
This is a government created crisis. Sadly they dont pay, the taxpayer does.
This post was edited on 4/24/20 at 3:49 pm
Posted on 4/24/20 at 3:49 pm to High C
quote:
Does your friend want his job back in the long run?
Well surviving and paying your bills in the short term is also important. If the employer isn't offering enough hours to actually help you pay your bills, then I would stay and figure it out on the back end.
Your employer may very well fold in the next 6 months anyway.
Posted on 4/24/20 at 3:56 pm to RogerTheShrubber
If I am an employer trying to open back up I will not expect my staff to want to come back at half the hours they were at before. Even with no stimulus or CARES that is still BS.
Posted on 4/24/20 at 3:56 pm to Slagathor
quote:this exact scenario is causing me a huge panic attack currently. My work is ok with my medical reasons to stay home, my doctor is fine with documenting it, but I hope and pray my husband's work would be agreeable. He can work 100% from home but it is NOT his company's norm prior to this pandemic.
I would be on board with this if it was also opened to those in the same household as medically-documented high-risk people as well.
I know this is ripe for abuse, but to do otherwise will create a huge crack for people to fall in IMO. We could intelligently create oversight for this.
Posted on 4/24/20 at 3:57 pm to jbgleason
quote:
But what happens if the employer tells you to come back for 10 hours a week or some such?
You can still file for unemployment in that scenario I believe.
Posted on 4/24/20 at 5:51 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
quote: the $600 a flat amount regardless of what you earned before or what state is also paying?
Yes
Well that is F'd up. Probably what I ranted some for Trump signing it, but I hadn't looked it up since.
Also probably motivating a fair amount of the people complaining about reopening economy.
Using Texas scenarios A person who used to make $31,200 a year, but now making weekly what would be $58,240. Plus $1,200 one time payment.
Person making $62,400 or higher now making $58,240 plus $1,200 one time payment.
Who is more motivated to push going back to work full time? Who is more likely to vote for candidates pushing universal income this November?
Are the people with "pay increases" due to unemployment still allowed to skirt rent payments? If anything they should be held even more responsible for their bills. Their disposable income went up.
The people seeing a decrease in their disposable income when filing unemployment due to shutdown and who are paying a mortgage get forbearance and lump sum payment at the end with less money.
These things always seem to crap on middle class. They should have limited increase to what was being earned before and slid that money to being closer to making those whole who were making $60,000 to $75,000 a year before laid off.
Make more people in middle class closer to being whole by not paying anyone more than they made, and also then deduct from combined state and fed what they earn each week or what employer offered to them to work. No games to keep fed payment. No pay raises through government unemployment payments.
This post was edited on 4/24/20 at 7:42 pm
Popular
Back to top

0






