Started By
Message

re: Restaurant die-off is first course of California’s $15 minimum wage

Posted on 6/19/17 at 2:11 pm to
Posted by Chucktown_Badger
The banks of the Ashley River
Member since May 2013
35732 posts
Posted on 6/19/17 at 2:11 pm to
quote:

Do you all even understand the MPC? If you increased wages at the bottom across the board it would actually have a positive long term effect on the economy. If people have more money they can demand more goods and services. If the supply can't be met, it would only inspire new suppliers of said goods and services to enter the market to meet the supply. Money would trickle up and every one wins.


So for the people in the industry who have more skills and experience and make $15 now, would you not need to pay them more? And what about the people above those people? Everyone would cost more all the way up, not just the lowest rung. You're creating an artificial floor where their compensation outweighs their value.

And do you not think that businesses would need to increase their prices to cover that added expense? You can't just look at it in a vacuum like you're trying to do.
Posted by jrodLSUke
Premium
Member since Jan 2011
25650 posts
Posted on 6/19/17 at 2:11 pm to
I saw a movie last night with a scene set in California, and didn't see a single restaurant worker fired.
Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
87903 posts
Posted on 6/19/17 at 2:12 pm to
quote:

And just watch: minority-owned businesses will be more adversely affected

they'll continue to do what they have been doing, operating largely an a cash basis, paying just enough taxes as not to raise any flags and their employees will be family/illegals that will further drive down their operating costs
Posted by idlewatcher
Planet Arium
Member since Jan 2012
91938 posts
Posted on 6/19/17 at 2:15 pm to
quote:

you took that the wrong way, I'm saying that raising the wage of the lowest part of the food chain of a restaurants' payroll by a few bucks is not going to be the demise of the establishment


Was teasing you brah. But I will have to disagree with you regarding wages. This isn't an economies of scale type of situation.

Where do you think the extra $$ will come from? Either cut staff or jack up the prices on the menu; which will in turn turn off prospective customers which in turn leads to minimal business which won't be able to support paying those people $15/hr and then boom - doors shut.

I'd like to hear your argument.
Posted by LouisianaLady
Member since Mar 2009
82644 posts
Posted on 6/19/17 at 2:16 pm to
quote:

No way a restaurant owner can absorb that kind of cost.


Agree.

quote:

And no way should a customer have to pay x number of dollars more for the same type of product that may be marginal at best (and was well suited for the price point they were at before the wage increase).


I wouldn't care either way, but that's just me personally. I could see why someone wouldn't want to basically be forced to pay 20% "tip" (via price hikes), but meh. Doesn't bother me either way. I'll end up spending the same - possibly even less.
Posted by Easy
Los Angeles
Member since Dec 2008
5687 posts
Posted on 6/19/17 at 2:16 pm to
I'm in LA and I haven't noticed this either. If anything more restaurants are opening than ever.

What I have noticed is some restaurants going to a "no tipping" policy. I have to say that I really like that.
Posted by rocket31
Member since Jan 2008
41880 posts
Posted on 6/19/17 at 2:19 pm to
Residents from leaching red States who consistently need govt assistance criticizing California is always worth a good laugh
Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
87903 posts
Posted on 6/19/17 at 2:20 pm to
quote:

I'd like to hear your argument.

the economy is a dynamic world, my argument is capitalism, adapt, survive, or be eaten, this seems like a pretty small issue to me

quote:

Either cut staff or jack up the prices on the menu;

that's one option

quote:

which will in turn turn off prospective customers


possibly, for me personally, I don't return to a restaurant based on how much I paid, but for what I received for what I paid
Posted by EmperorGout
I hate all of you.
Member since Feb 2008
11528 posts
Posted on 6/19/17 at 2:20 pm to
quote:

As the East Bay Times reported in January, at least 60 restaurants around the Bay Area had closed since September alone.


Well that just begs the question - what's the typical number of closures in a similar timeframe?

The article is speculative at best, if anything I'm astounded at how many restaurants have been opening around here
Posted by President
Clark and Addison
Member since May 2016
240 posts
Posted on 6/19/17 at 2:21 pm to
Let CA fall apart
Posted by MontyFranklyn
T-Town
Member since Jan 2012
24290 posts
Posted on 6/19/17 at 2:21 pm to
quote:

So for the people in the industry who have more skills and experience and make $15 now, would you not need to pay them more?
That is up to the employer. If the employee decides to leave because someone is making just as much as them that is on that individual.
quote:

And what about the people above those people?
Same as the answer above. If they need to feel superior through a wage gap, that is on them. If they leave to seek employment that meets their wage gap superiority it works out for everyone because the job they vacated will be filled.
quote:

Everyone would cost more all the way up, not just the lowest rung. You're creating an artificial floor where their compensation outweighs their value.
Not really. Lifting up the bottom doesn't push up everyone else, it just closes the wage gap.
quote:

And do you not think that businesses would need to increase their prices to cover that added expense? You can't just look at it in a vacuum like you're trying to do.
short term they'd take a hit, but long term they'd be okay because they'd essentially get more money from a thriving economy overall.


This post was edited on 6/19/17 at 2:22 pm
Posted by LouisianaLady
Member since Mar 2009
82644 posts
Posted on 6/19/17 at 2:21 pm to
quote:

Residents from leaching red States who consistently need govt assistance criticizing California is always worth a good laugh



But, don't you know? Shitting on California is the cool thing to do, Rocket.
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
56731 posts
Posted on 6/19/17 at 2:22 pm to
quote:

I just got back from Cali and this has no validity at all.


Anecdotal.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
92686 posts
Posted on 6/19/17 at 2:22 pm to
Im in SD and more restaurants keep opening up

Must be fake news. Im sure somewhere like Bakersfield would be hit


Posted by jrodLSUke
Premium
Member since Jan 2011
25650 posts
Posted on 6/19/17 at 2:22 pm to
Yeah, cause California doesn't deserve any criticism.
Posted by go ta hell ole miss
Member since Jan 2007
14474 posts
Posted on 6/19/17 at 2:22 pm to
quote:

walkons waiteresses use to make $2.13 an hour, thats ways away from $15.A sk me how I know:


Because it is common knowledge among the English speaking world that waitresses made $2.13 (PLUS TIPS). Of course that excludes waitresses that actually have to bid on jobs and pay restaurants to work for them because the tips are so great.
Posted by ctiger69
Member since May 2005
31030 posts
Posted on 6/19/17 at 2:24 pm to
What is California so backwards? My guess.........inbreeding.
Posted by AUCE05
Member since Dec 2009
44661 posts
Posted on 6/19/17 at 2:25 pm to
One thing I did notice, good BBQ is lacking in SD. I had some ribs at Coronado Brewing Company, and they were baked. A real smokehouse would kill it.
Posted by LouisianaLady
Member since Mar 2009
82644 posts
Posted on 6/19/17 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

Why do you hate people who want to earn a living wage?



To be entirely fair, I'd have never wanted this wage increase as a server unless people were still allowed to tip.

I didn't even work at an expensive place, and I made more than $15/hr most shifts. I can't imagine working somewhere really nice and only walking out with $75.

As a consumer, I'd be fine with either/or, but if I was waiting tables, I wouldn't want a standard wage with no tips unless that standard wage was 20% of my sales each shift.
Posted by bigrob385series
B. Aura
Member since May 2014
2636 posts
Posted on 6/19/17 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

I'm not in the mood to debate this issue but what I just said is a fact

i don't believe you
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram