- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Regarding the Oregon shooter and his message board posts the night before
Posted on 10/2/15 at 8:34 am to lsuhunt555
Posted on 10/2/15 at 8:34 am to lsuhunt555
quote:
lsuhunt555
Seems like youre wishing death on tammy from bama. Hopefully someone doesnt take you serious or you can be facing charges
quote:
she seems like a pretty awful person. I cant honestly believe she is real. Between her and Phyllis I wish they were both taken from the earth....
Posted on 10/2/15 at 8:34 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
What charges are you going to press?
Don't you start your bickering with me.
I didn't say they should press charges, I said that that's the only way they would have any repercussions.
Posted on 10/2/15 at 8:35 am to fightingtiger2335
quote:
taken from the earth...
You put a whole lot of words in my mouth there, but nice try.
Posted on 10/2/15 at 8:36 am to mizzoukills
quote:
I believe the people who encouraged the shooter to kill share the burden of responsibility.
I agree, a joke is only funny until it's not. People shouldn't be allowed to just say whatever they want without consequences. Words hurt, just like weapons and they should be regulated just like weapons.
Posted on 10/2/15 at 8:36 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
I think you're treating this as if a rational person committed this crime.
I agree that is probably a bit of a reach, but its possible he was reaching out for some outside opinions, no?
Posted on 10/2/15 at 8:37 am to Wtodd
quote:
Disagree...it's not against the law to be an a-hole or a lot of us would be in jail.
It's not against the law to be a bad driver, but you can still be charged with manslaughter if you do something dumb.
Posted on 10/2/15 at 8:38 am to LucasP
quote:
People shouldn't be allowed to just say whatever they want without consequences
So when you go see a movie that has killings in it..if you say that movie is awesome you are encouraging someone to do it
Posted on 10/2/15 at 8:39 am to fightingtiger2335
Taken from the earth =\= death, but again nice try on the bait. Maybe I want alien life form to take them so they can implant SEC culture around the universe.
Posted on 10/2/15 at 8:40 am to LucasP
quote:
Words hurt, just like weapons and they should be regulated just like weapons.
I see what you're doin', Lucas...
Posted on 10/2/15 at 8:42 am to RB10
quote:
It's not against the law to be a bad driver, but you can still be charged with manslaughter if you do something dumb.
Actually it is against the law to be a bad driver. A bad driver is someone that doesn't obey the laws for a multitude of reasons such as tailgating, illegal lane changes, speeding, texting and driving, etc.
Posted on 10/2/15 at 8:42 am to mizzoukills
quote:
Be careful, people.
quote:
mizzoukills
You trying to tell us something, psycho?
Posted on 10/2/15 at 8:42 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
Agree 100%, but those kinds of people don't have a conscience, so short of pressing charges there are no repercussions for them.
What charges are you going to press?
It amazes me how ready people are to allow the Government to write new laws to consistently take away our freedoms yet they don't understand that the repercussions of such laws could be far reaching and actually affect more innocent people than criminals.
The IRS taking money from innocent people to combat the war on drugs is a great example of this. How many drug dealers do you think keep their money in banks?
Posted on 10/2/15 at 8:44 am to mizzoukills
They should hold some of the responsibility for murder, simply because they posted messages? They are fricked up no doubt. However I think punishing someone for speaking / posting is a bit absurd. Holding someone, who posted a message, responsible for murder is a bit much. The person who committed the murder is responsible 100%.
However they are the scum of the earth for encouraging something like this.
However they are the scum of the earth for encouraging something like this.
Posted on 10/2/15 at 8:45 am to fightingtiger2335
That depends, I doubt the authorities would consider alien abduction kid napping and if they did, would the grand jury even indict?
Posted on 10/2/15 at 8:46 am to patchesohoulihan_007
so what you're saying is that it's a fine line...right?
Posted on 10/2/15 at 8:49 am to mizzoukills
Not sure if you've ever been on 4chan but that website is 9 billion trolls to 1 actual threat. there's no way anyone would have taken an anonymous post seriously.
Posted on 10/2/15 at 8:49 am to mizzoukills
That wasn't the shooter.
That is what 4channers call "copypasta". It's a generic post that gets recycled over and over and over.
I've seen it before and no one got shot those days. It's only being investigated because something happened.
Those posts happen everyday. I guess it's possible it's the shooter but I really don't think it is.
That is what 4channers call "copypasta". It's a generic post that gets recycled over and over and over.
I've seen it before and no one got shot those days. It's only being investigated because something happened.
Those posts happen everyday. I guess it's possible it's the shooter but I really don't think it is.
Posted on 10/2/15 at 8:49 am to mizzoukills
quote:
I see what you're doin', Lucas..
Good, then shut up with this line of thought. Jokes are jokes, shootings are shootings. There's no confusing the two.
Stop trying to create conflict where there's none.
This post was edited on 10/2/15 at 8:51 am
Popular
Back to top


1








