- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 8/2/17 at 9:41 pm to Ed Osteen
quote:
You have no idea what you are taking about. Narcan is only administered when someone is overdosing, so who gives a shite about the patients feelings when they are turning blue
I'm an ER pharmacist and have responded to more ODs than you have years alive on this planet.
Posted on 8/2/17 at 9:42 pm to Hangover Haven
quote:
Hangover Haven
Posted on 8/2/17 at 9:42 pm to SuperSaint
quote:
more white, sometimes almost grey
Heroin is more Brown almost like brown sugar (in Nola atleast)
bruh... you ain't back in them streets, huh?
Posted on 8/2/17 at 9:43 pm to chRxis
Not even slightly... just trying to drop some info

Posted on 8/2/17 at 9:43 pm to Ed Osteen
It can, but no where near as pronounced.
You have endogenous transmitters in your body that bind to those receptors and narcan can reverse all of them. But it shouldn't make them go crazy like giving narcan to someone who had one too many doses of Dilaudid.
You have endogenous transmitters in your body that bind to those receptors and narcan can reverse all of them. But it shouldn't make them go crazy like giving narcan to someone who had one too many doses of Dilaudid.
Posted on 8/2/17 at 9:44 pm to Tiguar
Ok so maybe you do
I'm just confused by when you said you should avoid it unless a patient is dying from an overdose. Isn't that the only time you would give someone narcan?
I'm just confused by when you said you should avoid it unless a patient is dying from an overdose. Isn't that the only time you would give someone narcan?
Posted on 8/2/17 at 9:45 pm to Tiguar
Yeah, sorry about the spelling, don't use spellcheck or autocorrect. Carry on, please?
Posted on 8/2/17 at 9:47 pm to Ed Osteen
quote:
Does narcan even do anything to someone that isn't on opioids?
no...
but the problem i have with the narcan being available to just anyone is, let's say you have a person OD, then you give them narcan.... now, when that narcan is in their system, their mu receptors (where the opiate attaches and exerts it's effect) are irreversibly bound to the narcan, meaning any opiate injected or ingested after that absolutely will NOT elicit a proper or expected response.... the user won't get "high"... so to combat this the user will then re-dose in an effort to get high, but all they will be doing is getting the side effects of the opiate (mainly respiratory depression, which is what most die from), rather than the "high".....
this is exactly what i think happened to Prince... he had a narcan shot IIRC 2 days before he OD'd and died.....
Posted on 8/2/17 at 9:48 pm to SuperSaint
quote:
Not even slightly... just trying to drop some info
phew!!!
good deal, how you been?
Posted on 8/2/17 at 9:48 pm to Tiguar
quote:
I'm not too up to speed on their training needed to do this, but I will tell you ACLS training won't give them the clinical acumen necessary to make the judgement call. I remember a patient brought into my ER and I responded to the intubation code- heroin OD. Paramedics gave him narcan in the field and had to re-sedate him after because he started fighting them. Doc was pissed. He asked how he was satting and if he ever lost a pulse. They said his 02 SATs were 88-95 but his respiratory rate was like 4-6. He yelled at them for like 5 minutes asking why they narcan'd a reasonably stable patient
I agree with everything you just said. ACLS certified is not nearly enough training. It is funny how some people think they will just walk up to a blue person and give him some Narcan and all is well. There is a lot more to it than giving Narcan such as airway management, hemodynamic management, cardiac, trauma, injuries etc.... A police officer is just not qualified or trained to be able to handle an emergency medical situation when seconds matter and multiple tasks need to be completed immediately and I don't think there is a single police officer that wants that liability either. Paramedics are very good at their job because that is what they do for a living.
This post was edited on 8/2/17 at 10:02 pm
Posted on 8/2/17 at 9:49 pm to Ed Osteen
quote:
I'm just confused by when you said you should avoid it unless a patient is dying from an overdose. Isn't that the only time you would give someone narcan?
imagine you're in an ambulance, would you rather ride with a nice sleepy dopehead or an awake angry that you wasted his 15 bucks worth of dope dopehead
assume both have aids
Posted on 8/2/17 at 9:49 pm to Ed Osteen
Yes, exactly. And in my previous example, paramedics gave it despite the patient having decent O2 SATs. He wasn't dying. He was just very, very sleepy.
"First do no harm". So they gave him narcan and he's not in respiratory depression, great.
Oops, now he's mad and combative and in some sort of psychotic delirium (you don't know if he only took an opiate- he could be on a psychotropic too like this guy was and now he's delirious and mad). Now we have to give him versed or propofol which have their own array of problems.
Or we could just not have given narcan and monitored his o2 SATs while en route to the ER.
It's not just about the patients feelings- it's about the complete picture and understanding how one thing you do now could have an effect on what happens down the line. Risk/benefit
"First do no harm". So they gave him narcan and he's not in respiratory depression, great.
Oops, now he's mad and combative and in some sort of psychotic delirium (you don't know if he only took an opiate- he could be on a psychotropic too like this guy was and now he's delirious and mad). Now we have to give him versed or propofol which have their own array of problems.
Or we could just not have given narcan and monitored his o2 SATs while en route to the ER.
It's not just about the patients feelings- it's about the complete picture and understanding how one thing you do now could have an effect on what happens down the line. Risk/benefit
This post was edited on 8/2/17 at 9:54 pm
Posted on 8/2/17 at 9:51 pm to ThruThickandThin
My MIL was in the final stages of cancer and we had the patches and would cut them into smaller pieces, wearing gloves and apply them and she had no pain . It's serious stuff.
Posted on 8/2/17 at 9:55 pm to ThruThickandThin
Fentanyl, 100 times more potent than Morphine. Can be absorbed through the skin. Short acting drug, but does not take much to overdose and die.
Posted on 8/2/17 at 9:58 pm to ThruThickandThin
A highly publicized case from a few months ago where an officer had to be routed by EMS after brushing it off of a uniform.
LINK
LINK
Posted on 8/2/17 at 10:02 pm to tLSU
SWIM used to get the patches years ago and eat the gel. Was an incredible high I'm told.
Posted on 8/2/17 at 10:31 pm to Hangover Haven
When I was diagnosed the second time with Stage Lymphoma, I had a 16cm tall by 9cm wide tumor wrapped around the lumbar region of my spine. I was in so much pain that 3 OxyContins a day could barely relieve the pain. It was real bad. They prescribed me Fentanyl and it had some adverse affects on me. The pain was less but I was flush like I had taken 5 Viagra and I was constantly dizzy. I had double vision within 30 minutes of putting the patch on and had to put an eye patch over my left eye to see straight. Within 24 hours my left eye drooped like I had had a stroke. Luckily, I was scheduled to begin treatment a few days later and I just quit that after a day and suffered through the pain. That drug had me so disoriented that I just chose to suffer through with OxyContin.
It is WAY stronger than oxycontin and I don't blame anyone for not wanting to handle one of those patches without a barrier.
It is WAY stronger than oxycontin and I don't blame anyone for not wanting to handle one of those patches without a barrier.
Posted on 8/2/17 at 10:31 pm to SuperSaint
quote:
quote: hyperbole from cops? this completely
Yea the hyperbole may be funny to you but not me. I'm not taking any chances handling the shite. Don't really see why anyone would think it's funny when someone is extremely cautious about it
For those that talked about officers being trained with narcan, officer are in fact being given a crash course on it. I sat through one of these training that was incorporated with use of epi-pens and part of a basic First Aid / CPR class. All I'll say is that I understand first responders should be able to give aid, but firefighters and medics aren't given basic police training so why are officers being given a crash course in medical treatment? Applying a tourniquet / pressure on a wound and doing chest compressions is about as much medical attention I'll do.
Popular
Back to top



2






