- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Quality dress watch < $250
Posted on 6/14/15 at 11:59 am to Bulletproof Lover
Posted on 6/14/15 at 11:59 am to Bulletproof Lover
quote:An don't listen to these people.
Entry level for a dress watch is $800. Anything less is a beater.
Posted on 6/14/15 at 4:12 pm to cuyahoga tiger
quote:
citizen eco drive
Posted on 6/14/15 at 4:57 pm to Bulletproof Lover
quote:
Entry level for a dress watch is $800. Anything less is a beater.
You're an idiot who probably shops at Overstock.com or Jomashop.
Posted on 6/14/15 at 4:57 pm to blkhawktiger
quote:
If you really want quality for that price, my advice would be to go look for a vintage Universal Geneve, Omega, or Tissot. There are some deals to be had on eBay and etsy.
Lol.
Posted on 6/14/15 at 5:10 pm to Navytiger74
omega for $245
really nice one for $690 tho
To anyone looking for a watch at any price level: download the WatchRecon app., do some homework, and have a little patience.
really nice one for $690 tho
To anyone looking for a watch at any price level: download the WatchRecon app., do some homework, and have a little patience.
This post was edited on 6/14/15 at 5:39 pm
Posted on 6/14/15 at 5:28 pm to Navytiger74
Navytiger74,
Well don't you feel stupid now...
Well don't you feel stupid now...
This post was edited on 6/14/15 at 5:29 pm
Posted on 6/14/15 at 5:29 pm to Bulletproof Lover
quote:
Entry level for a dress watch is $800. Anything less is a beater.
My first watch was a Junkers Bauhaus...can be had in your price range. Still get compliments on it...you will want to change the strap though.
Posted on 6/14/15 at 5:33 pm to brgfather129
Two pages, and nobody´s replied with ´frick a watch, I´ve got my phone. what an outdated social convention´.

Posted on 6/14/15 at 5:36 pm to Dandy Lion
"Need a watch recommendation"
"iPhone"
"iPhone"
Posted on 6/14/15 at 6:32 pm to blkhawktiger
quote:
Well don't you feel stupid now...
Verify their condition and their serials my friend.
This post was edited on 6/15/15 at 7:08 am
Posted on 6/14/15 at 6:41 pm to Navytiger74
So defensive. Typical of someone who overlooks the fact that I clearly stated Omega's at that price would likely be rough and would absolutely be manuals. Another poster took a minute, like I said it would take, and found an example of what I was referencing, using a source I stated would be helpful. Cry me a river bitch.
:insert you can't handle the truth:
Posted on 6/14/15 at 7:18 pm to Navytiger74
quote:
Verify their condition and their serials my friend . Then we'll discuss who's dumb.
Nice one. 1) both of those are original. 2) We're talking about <$700 vintage watches, not heirlooms. Who gives a shite if it has a reprinted dial or bumper movement? The fact is Omega (and many other quality brands) made a shite load of middle-of-the-pack watches from the 50s through the 80s. Not every Omega is a SM300, not every Breitling is a Navitimer, and not every Rolex is a Submariner. I can find decent sub-$1000 examples of all 3 brands that would be better than some Shinola garbage.
This post was edited on 6/14/15 at 7:22 pm
Posted on 6/14/15 at 7:33 pm to GaryMyMan
I couldn't have said it better. The fact is that there are a ton of lackluster modern brands sporting attractive faces that are absolute garbage underneath. I would easily prefer a vintage beater from a respectable brand than a lot of the newer stuff we're seeing now.
This is however not a bulletproof assessment. Not all newer brands are garbage and not all vintage watches have workhorse movements. But the majority of newer brands seen on this board certainly fall into that category and it's not difficult to find affordable vintage watches that are awesome.
Edit: I woudknt necessarily consider Shinola garbage. The mention of the brand was to reference the recent homegrown trend of "boutique" brands that have become popular. Daniel Wellington, I'm looking at you.
This is however not a bulletproof assessment. Not all newer brands are garbage and not all vintage watches have workhorse movements. But the majority of newer brands seen on this board certainly fall into that category and it's not difficult to find affordable vintage watches that are awesome.
Edit: I woudknt necessarily consider Shinola garbage. The mention of the brand was to reference the recent homegrown trend of "boutique" brands that have become popular. Daniel Wellington, I'm looking at you.
This post was edited on 6/14/15 at 7:39 pm
Posted on 6/14/15 at 8:30 pm to SJS101
quote:
Do yourself a favor and check out Orient watches. In house automatic movements and quite possibly the best watches in the world at affordable prices that hardly anybody has ever heard of
This
Or get a Seiko and throw a Leather Nato Band on it.
Posted on 6/14/15 at 9:01 pm to LSU6262
Get an Iwatch! That is dressy.
Actually, I have a citizen Eco drive that I love, but it is dark and no help to you.
Actually, I have a citizen Eco drive that I love, but it is dark and no help to you.
Posted on 6/14/15 at 9:15 pm to LSU6262
Posted on 6/14/15 at 9:36 pm to Covingtiger
I've sported this guy for the past three years and get tons of compliments. Before this, I sported Timex watches. Always help up just fine for me.

Posted on 6/14/15 at 9:52 pm to LSU6262
Skagen for less than $100. A stylish classic, not a clunky Rolex wanna-be . Light, water resistant (i shower, swim, etc.) and don't have to worry about it.


This post was edited on 6/14/15 at 9:54 pm
Popular
Back to top



1








