Started By
Message

re: Philando Castile shooting dashcam video released - NSFW

Posted on 6/22/17 at 12:37 pm to
Posted by SUB
Silver Tier TD Premium
Member since Jan 2009
23224 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 12:37 pm to
quote:

It's not an assumption


quote:

It's a conclusion based on what was said and the context of the stop up until the point when the cop flipped out and emptied his pistol into the car, with the girlfriend and child passengers lucky to come out of it alive.


Which IS an assumption...You are assuming something happened based on what was said. You did not see what happened, so you HAVE to assume what happened.
This post was edited on 6/22/17 at 2:58 pm
Posted by Spock's Eyebrow
Member since May 2012
12300 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 12:59 pm to
quote:

Which IS an assumption...You are assuming something happened based on what was said. You did not see what happened, so you HAVE to assume what happened.


Please don't clip a sentence fragment out of a complete thought and ignore the remainder of it. You didn't even take that whole fragment into account.
Posted by Willie Stroker
Member since Sep 2008
14558 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 1:42 pm to
quote:

Castile was calm. He was obeying an order.


I think you mean Castile sounded calm. There's no evidence that he was obeying an order.
Posted by Willie Stroker
Member since Sep 2008
14558 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 1:58 pm to
quote:

*The officer asked for his wallet. 

*Castille had no reason to reach for his gun and had already told the officer he had a firearm. 

*Castille calmly said he was not reaching for his firearm. 

Correct. And at no point during these events did the officer shoot Castile or Diamond Williams.

quote:


*Diamond Reynolds stated in the immediate aftermath and in her testimony he was unbuckling to reach for his wallet.


She has no idea what was going through his head, and neither did the cop. Her perception about his intent is no more accurate than Yanez's perception.

quote:

*Autopsy evidence showed bullet wounds to trigger finger but not area of his pocket where gun was located which would have been likely the case if his hand was in the pocket where gun was located. 

The location of injuries is accurate, but why do you believe the location of an injury has any evidentiary value to what he was reaching for? You really appear to be making up things.


quote:

What evidence do you have he was reaching for a gun?

I'm not claiming there is any evidence other than the cops words and lawful commands.

A lack of evidence does not mean we get to make up our own narrative. We have to accept that there was not sufficient evidence to advance a prosecution of the cop.
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
22464 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 2:16 pm to
If Castille had no intention to use his gun, then why didn't he move it or his wallet so as to separate his license from his gun?

The police testified the car smelled of marijuana, this had been unstated here. It's very possible that Castille was high, paranoid, and not acting rationally.

Black guy with dreads, smell of marijuana, and no brake lights tells you he has a gun. There's not a cop in the world that would tell you that's not a high stress situation.
Posted by Willie Stroker
Member since Sep 2008
14558 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 2:16 pm to
quote:

Why would he go for the gun?
1. He had committed no crime, other than broken tailight.
2. He had gone thru the trouble of obtaining a firearm permit.
3. He told the cop he had a gun in the car.
4. He had a woman and child with him, with two armed officers on both sides of the car.

It's not like Castile was a fugitive, or had any reason to fight the power.. This is simply an example of the cop overreacting, after a pretextual stop. Poor training and fear leads to shitty outcomes.

Humans don't always respond rationally. None of those observations you typed have any bearing on whether or not an irrational, violent act may occur. Cops are trained not to be complacent.

Every time a cop is shot or killed, the events that preceded it are examined for lessons to be learned. It's not uncommon for complacency to be at the root of preventable law enforcement deaths. I agree that fear was a factor, but fear is at the root of all training for preventing lethal force encounters.

It would be nice if we could ensure that all cops were fearless... or would that result in other undesirable outcomes?
Posted by samson73103
Krypton
Member since Nov 2008
8778 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 2:18 pm to
quote:

Pulling people over for a brake light, a tag light, a headlight out, etc is all just a bullshite reason to go fishing for DUI's, drugs etc. All that foolishness needs to stop.

I am a gun loving, law enforcement supporting person but I agree with this statement.
Posted by beauchristopher
Member since Jan 2008
69579 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 2:18 pm to
Yeah he definitely needed to take more command of the situation

Like tell him put hands on steering wheel now or I will shoot you period

Then even after he shoots him several times he can't handle the situation and just leaves him in there until other police show up several minutes later to pull him out and try to revive him

Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
22464 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 2:21 pm to
quote:

quote:
Pulling people over for a brake light, a tag light, a headlight out, etc is all just a bull shite reason to go fishing for DUI's, drugs etc. All that foolishness needs to stop.

I am a gun loving, law enforcement supporting person but I agree with this statement.


Do you realize it's dangerous as hell to drive without brake lights? The cops did nothing but ask for his license and registration, for all we know they would of told him to fix his lights and let him go had the gun not come up.
Posted by Displaced
Member since Dec 2011
32914 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 2:24 pm to
Except that the real reason the cop pulled him over was that he matched the description of an armed Robert suspect....
Posted by phil good
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2013
1668 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 2:24 pm to
Officer was found not guilty by a jury. Why keep arguing over it?
Posted by Willie Stroker
Member since Sep 2008
14558 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 2:25 pm to
quote:

None of that means that the cop shouldn't be held accountable when they frick up though, which is the case here.


Why do you think he is not being held accountable? Is a felony conviction in the absence of definitive evidence the preferred method of holding him accountable for his role in the incident? At this point, we know there will not be a felony conviction for the offense he was charged with. His law enforcement career is over. He'll be sued. Isn't civil court also used to hold people accountable?
Posted by Displaced
Member since Dec 2011
32914 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 2:26 pm to
Because it's not right, you fricking moron... Cops should not be near impossible to convince when they frick up.

Just like any of the unjust or unfair policies in place. Just because it is legal doesn't mean it's right.
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
22464 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 2:29 pm to
quote:


Except that the real reason the cop pulled him over was that he matched the description of an armed Robert suspect....


I'm pretty sure that has been proven false, and it doesn't change the fact both of Castille's brake lights were out and that's dangerous as hell.

But let's take that as fact. Potential robber is pulled over, smells of marijuana, acts high, and tells you he has a gun. Then he reaches for the gun? Legal shoot.
This post was edited on 6/22/17 at 2:31 pm
Posted by phil good
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2013
1668 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 2:33 pm to
quote:

Displaced


Why are you so angry? I asked a question and get called a moron. Lol. Bitch all you want you yellow bellied beady eyed slack jawed frick face it's not going to change. Just the way the system works.
Posted by EA6B
TX
Member since Dec 2012
14754 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 2:45 pm to
quote:

The police testified the car smelled of marijuana, this had been unstated here. It's very possible that Castille was high, paranoid, and not acting rationally.


Like at the beginning of the interaction when he calmly and clearly told the cop he had a firearm, was that the act of a paranoid and irrational person?
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
137030 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 2:53 pm to
quote:

Like at the beginning of the interaction when he calmly and clearly told the cop he had a firearm


It wasn't at the beginning of the interaction. He waited until he was going for his information to tell the cop he had a gun.
Posted by GeauxTigerTM
Member since Sep 2006
30596 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 2:57 pm to
quote:

smells of marijuana


Did he actually have MJ in his system, or was this one of those infamous "Well...I smell pot in here. You guys been smoking?" type situations?

Because, honestly...I don't give much credence to the old I smell pot stuff.
Posted by SUB
Silver Tier TD Premium
Member since Jan 2009
23224 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 2:58 pm to
quote:

lease don't clip a sentence fragment out of a complete thought and ignore the remainder of it. You didn't even take that whole fragment into account.


Yes, I did. I only clipped it because it was a long quote and the rest of it did not change the fact that you are making an assumption. I updated the quote so your feeling won't be so hurt.
Posted by FelicianaTigerfan
Comanche County
Member since Aug 2009
26059 posts
Posted on 6/22/17 at 3:01 pm to
quote:

Officer was found not guilty by a jury. Why keep arguing over it?


I have no idea how this thread made it this many pages but Im not going to read through all the stupidity
Jump to page
Page First 16 17 18 19
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 18 of 19Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram