Started By
Message

re: Pfizer’s CEO Hasn’t Gotten His Covid Vaccine Yet, Say He Doesn’t Want To Cut In Line!

Posted on 12/15/20 at 8:27 pm to
Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
125759 posts
Posted on 12/15/20 at 8:27 pm to
Article is 2 years old and based on data years older than that

mRNA technology has advanced far beyond that article in just the last 2 years.
Posted by LoneStar23
USA
Member since Aug 2019
5706 posts
Posted on 12/15/20 at 8:28 pm to
quote:

mRNA technology has advanced far beyond that article in just the last 2 years.


Source?
Posted by LSURep864
Moscow, Idaho
Member since Nov 2007
11086 posts
Posted on 12/15/20 at 8:31 pm to
[
This post was edited on 1/10/21 at 10:56 pm
Posted by WinnPtiger
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2011
24631 posts
Posted on 12/15/20 at 8:33 pm to
quote:

Yet you will probably buy street tacos cooked by a gross guy in a dirty van


because that’s the same as a first run vaccine
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
104308 posts
Posted on 12/15/20 at 8:33 pm to
The autoimmune “risk” in that article itself is spoken in terms of simply needing to be studied more, i.e. in phase 3 type trials....

The article itself comes to the conclusion mRNA vaccines lack the risks of DNA and live virus vaccines
Posted by LSURep864
Moscow, Idaho
Member since Nov 2007
11086 posts
Posted on 12/15/20 at 8:34 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/10/21 at 10:56 pm
Posted by WDE24
Member since Oct 2010
54691 posts
Posted on 12/15/20 at 8:35 pm to
quote:

It's very interesting and surprising to see the anti-vac movement on the OT and PT.
it’s wild

Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
85116 posts
Posted on 12/15/20 at 8:35 pm to
I don’t know how anyone could read that article and not come away with the confidence that mRNA vaccines are safer than DNA vaccines

Posted by WaWaWeeWa
Member since Oct 2015
15714 posts
Posted on 12/15/20 at 8:35 pm to
quote:

Legitimate Source


quote:

Nature Reviews


you don’t read many medical journals do you
Posted by WaWaWeeWa
Member since Oct 2015
15714 posts
Posted on 12/15/20 at 8:38 pm to
quote:

However we have no answer to the autoimmune question because we can’t have long term data and until we are years down the road.


We also don’t know the long term effects of covid.

I’m not very concerned but you could speculate many different things 5-10 years down the road. Can you get it again and it be worse? Can successive infections lead to compounding lung damage?

It’s not like there’s an option that’s free of risk
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
85116 posts
Posted on 12/15/20 at 8:40 pm to
We also can’t have long term data on COVID.

Statistically, both are low risk for most people.

Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
89785 posts
Posted on 12/15/20 at 8:41 pm to
quote:

Look up. It’s super hard I know right?


Considering you posted it after I started my post, yeah, it would have been tough to do.
Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
125759 posts
Posted on 12/15/20 at 8:42 pm to
This seems to be what you are worried about in that article:

quote:

Several different mRNA vaccines have now been tested from phase I to IIb clinical studies and have been shown to be safe and reasonably well tolerated (TABLES 2,?,3).3). However, recent human trials have demonstrated moderate and in rare cases severe injection site or systemic reactions for different mRNA platforms22,91. Potential safety concerns that are likely to be evaluated in future preclinical and clinical studies include local and systemic inflammation, the biodistribution and persistence of expressed immunogen, stimulation of auto-reactive antibodies and potential toxic effects of any non-native nucleotides and delivery system components. A possible concern could be that some mRNA-based vaccine platforms54,166 induce potent type I interferon responses, which have been associated not only with inflammation but also potentially with autoimmunity167,168. Thus, identification of individuals at an increased risk of autoimmune reactions before mRNA vaccination may allow reasonable precautions to be taken. Another potential safety issue could derive from the presence of extracellular RNA during mRNA vaccination. Extracellular naked RNA has been shown to increase the permeability of tightly packed endothelial cells and may thus contribute to oedema169. Another study showed that extracellular RNA promoted blood coagulation and pathological thrombus formation170. Safety will therefore need continued evaluation as different mRNA modalities and delivery systems are utilized for the first time in humans and are tested in larger patient populations.


Note it says “possible concern.” Didnt say it had actually panned out.

Also looked at those tables and all those trials were in stage 1/2 with apparently pretty small sample sizes (i didnt delve into the subject numbers of each trial)

The sample sizes for current covid vaccines are pretty big and they have had a couple years to play with delivery systems.

Dont get the vaccine if you dont want to. But the fact that 90% of our docs are getting the pfizer vaccine in the next couple weeks should tell you something (every damn one of our ID docs is getting the vaccine and they understand the vaccines better than I do)
Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
125759 posts
Posted on 12/15/20 at 8:43 pm to
quote:

Yes. I understand in many ways an mRNA vaccine is actually safer. However we have no answer to the autoimmune question because we can’t have long term data and until we are years down the road.


Again, we dont know long term effects of this fricking covid bat virus until years down the road
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
89785 posts
Posted on 12/15/20 at 8:45 pm to
quote:

Don’t be such a combative dick. I’m legitimately looking for reasons to take the vaccine. Provide me with resources. Not just a logical fallacy appeal to authority.


To be fair, as others have already stated, you’re worried about an unknown potential risk of the vaccine without considering any unknown potential risks of Covid-19.
Posted by TulaneLSU
Member since Aug 2003
Member since Dec 2007
13595 posts
Posted on 12/15/20 at 8:46 pm to
Friend,

I'm really interested in the possibilities of getting rid of the common cold and influenza with these emerging mRNA vaccines. Wouldn't it be grand if five years from now we essentially stomp out respiratory viruses, all thanks to covid? I guess in this season I am looking for silver linings. It has been a tough Advent so far. No caroling, no church, no candy cane distribution, no ScADVENTure hunt. Next year I just cannot wait.

Yours,
TulaneLSU
Posted by Paul Allen
Montauk, NY
Member since Nov 2007
77251 posts
Posted on 12/15/20 at 8:47 pm to
quote:

TulaneLSU


Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
85116 posts
Posted on 12/15/20 at 8:48 pm to
I’d be first in line for a cocktail cold/flu/COVID vaccine

I hate getting sick
Posted by TulaneLSU
Member since Aug 2003
Member since Dec 2007
13595 posts
Posted on 12/15/20 at 8:49 pm to
Friend,

We could call it the RICKEY (R for rhinovirus, I for influenza, and C for coronavirus). I would be first in line next to you, but at least six feet away.

Yours,
TulaneLSU
This post was edited on 12/15/20 at 8:51 pm
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
85116 posts
Posted on 12/15/20 at 8:50 pm to
We could camp out together. Roast marshmallows. Make s’mores. Sing songs.

Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 11
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 11Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram