Started By
Message
locked post

Perspective on CV worldwide...am I missing something?

Posted on 3/15/20 at 6:11 pm
Posted by tha mastablasta
Somewhere over the rainbow
Member since Jan 2012
654 posts
Posted on 3/15/20 at 6:11 pm
There are 7.77 billion people on the planet.
There are just over 150000 confirmed cases CV globally

That’s a percentage of .002% of our global population with the country of highest population (China 1.4 billion roughly) already being through the peak of the “outbreak” and declining.

Why the frick is everyone in our country freaking out???

Please help me understand
Posted by PrivatePublic
Member since Nov 2012
17848 posts
Posted on 3/15/20 at 6:12 pm to
People are scared of the unknown.
Posted by Iron Lion
Romulus
Member since Nov 2014
14169 posts
Posted on 3/15/20 at 6:14 pm to
This is bigger than this virus. Think logically.
Posted by funnystuff
Member since Nov 2012
9253 posts
Posted on 3/15/20 at 6:16 pm to
quote:

am I missing something?
The concept of exponential growth
Posted by Walking the Earth
Member since Feb 2013
17464 posts
Posted on 3/15/20 at 6:16 pm to
I'm all for taking reasonable precautions, including the limiting of crowds. This is a novel virus with no known cure or vaccine and appears to be at least fairly contagious.

But I think our elected officials' idea of the cure may be worse than the disease.

It would have greatly helped for testing to be more widespread earlier in this country so we had some actual hard (and large) numbers to know what we are truly dealing with here.
This post was edited on 3/15/20 at 6:17 pm
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
53608 posts
Posted on 3/15/20 at 6:19 pm to
quote:

Please help me understand


I imagine it does seem odd when your picture is based on cherry picking data.

For example, why focus on China’s numbers at all, when the global case rate is accelerating?

Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
82435 posts
Posted on 3/15/20 at 6:19 pm to
quote:

It would have greatly helped for testing to be more widespread earlier in this country so we had some actual hard (and large) numbers to know what we are truly dealing with here.


Probably would have tamped diwn the panic.
Posted by subMOA
Komatipoort
Member since Jan 2010
2068 posts
Posted on 3/15/20 at 6:19 pm to
There are not enough respirators at hospitals in the US to handle it all if we don’t somehow slow the infection rate- flattening the curve as they call it.

Although healthy adults and kids handle it well, the elderly DO NOT. You don’t want to have your local ER doc having to decide do you- who just got in a car accident- or your grandma- who just got diagnosed with Covid-19 lives or dies. One will.

There is no conspiracy or “bigger issue” as
some are speculating. There are 100,000
respirators available to hospitals today. If it ramps up like it did elsewhere- we could overwhelm our health care system....we saw that in Italy already.

ETA- for all you downvoting. My wife works in healthcare and develops vaccines for a living. The article that just came out in Nature’s medical journal about the origins of Covid-19 was written by a doctor who she is on the same staff with. Everyone needs to calm down and understand that although an inconvenience now, a lot of VERY smart people are working on keeping us alive and healthy.
This post was edited on 3/15/20 at 6:27 pm
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
87748 posts
Posted on 3/15/20 at 6:20 pm to
Because there is no non-human intervention basis for thinking an illness with a .6 to 3% mortality rate would stop otherwise. It might, but we don't know that.

I don't think we'll have a couple hundred thousand deaths in the US, but aside from the measures taken, there is no reason we shouldnt based on current knowledge.
Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
19979 posts
Posted on 3/15/20 at 6:21 pm to
quote:

It would have greatly helped for testing to be more widespread earlier in this country so we had some actual hard (and large) numbers to know what we are truly dealing with here.


Why do you people keep imagining that test kits this specific can be magic'd out of the ether? Even if they had millions of test kits, there are only a handful of labs capable of conducting the tests to proper, reliable standards.
Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
19979 posts
Posted on 3/15/20 at 6:22 pm to
quote:

I don't think we'll have a couple hundred thousand deaths in the US,


There won't be that many deaths globally.
Posted by WaydownSouth
Stratton Oakmont
Member since Nov 2018
11349 posts
Posted on 3/15/20 at 6:22 pm to
quote:

Although healthy adults and kids handle it well, the elderly DO NOT. You don’t want to have your local ER doc having to decide do you- who just got in a car accident- or your grandma- who just got diagnosed with Covid-18 lives or dies. One will.


Hope you aren’t a democrat, because thats exactly what will happen with socialized medicine
Posted by Walking the Earth
Member since Feb 2013
17464 posts
Posted on 3/15/20 at 6:22 pm to
quote:

Why do you people keep imagining that test kits this specific can be magic'd out of the ether?


You're right. I acted under the assumption that we would as capable as Italy.

My mistake.
Posted by Unknown_Poster
Member since Jun 2013
5758 posts
Posted on 3/15/20 at 6:22 pm to
quote:

The concept of exponential growth

^ This. See, e.g., Italy.

Some of you think the spread will go up linearly at a small rate. That's not how this is going to work. Especially with morons dancing around Bourbon Street. Also consider that only a few hundred tests have been performed in Louisiana. Many are simply undiagnosed. And even more can actually have the virus yet show no symptoms (but are still capable of transmitting it to others).
This post was edited on 3/15/20 at 6:24 pm
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
141210 posts
Posted on 3/15/20 at 6:23 pm to
quote:

Please help me understand



Liberals trying to steal the election
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
87748 posts
Posted on 3/15/20 at 6:24 pm to
That's great, and if so it'll be either because

1) measures taken ensured that result, and/or

2) there is some other self limiting aspect neither you nor I know about
Posted by WaWaWeeWa
Member since Oct 2015
15714 posts
Posted on 3/15/20 at 6:25 pm to
quote:

Why do you people keep imagining that test kits this specific can be magic'd out of the ether? Even if they had millions of test kits, there are only a handful of labs capable of conducting the tests to proper, reliable standards.


My personal opinion was that massive country wide testing would identify the hot spots. As a hotspot is identified it’s locked down before the system is over run. The rest of the country can go on as normal.

Keep picking up the hotspots and lock the down as necessary until the initial wave passes. Staff and equipment can also be sent in to help these hotspots.

It’s a more proactive approach i.e. Korea

Rather than waiting for a bomb to go off and then reacting. It also allows the rest of the country to go on.
Posted by tha mastablasta
Somewhere over the rainbow
Member since Jan 2012
654 posts
Posted on 3/15/20 at 6:25 pm to
quote:

The concept of exponential growth


Doesn’t seem like exponential growth to me based on the fact that since November 17th (first reported case) there’s only been .002% of the population affected...
Posted by BuckyCheese
Member since Jan 2015
57778 posts
Posted on 3/15/20 at 6:27 pm to
quote:

the country of highest population (China 1.4 billion roughly) already being through the peak of the “outbreak” and declining.


China is back to work. Doesn't say their numbers are completely accurate, I'm sure they are not, but the fact they have lifted the draconian quarantines is telling.


I read a couple places that it may have mutated to a less dangerous strain.
Posted by WaWaWeeWa
Member since Oct 2015
15714 posts
Posted on 3/15/20 at 6:27 pm to
a percentage of a population doesn’t tell you anything about a rate

It’s a rate of change. You are looking at a static number. But you already know that.

It’s a very weak argument
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram