- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Patriot in St Louis and his wife defend property from BLM
Posted on 6/29/20 at 3:31 pm to LoveThatMoney
Posted on 6/29/20 at 3:31 pm to LoveThatMoney
quote:
actually defend their house and not their “private” street, all this would’ve been avoided.
Why is the word private in quotes?
Posted on 6/29/20 at 3:33 pm to NYNolaguy1
quote:
I mean standing on the front lawn is not exactly a defensible position.
It most certainly is.
Posted on 6/29/20 at 3:56 pm to ProjectP2294
Because there is an argument that the streets cannot be blocked off in such a fashion in St. Louis. They talked about the ordeal on STL Public Radio and one of the lawyers on there mentioned that it was his understanding that gated or not, you can’t keep pedestrians off the street. So I’ll just put it in quotes and it can be private or otherwise, because the point remains that if they had stayed inside, guns at the ready, no one would even know who they are.
Posted on 6/29/20 at 4:07 pm to TypoKnig
It's been bugging the shite our of me who that wife reminds me of. I finally got it.
Posted on 6/29/20 at 4:07 pm to stout
Has the news been broken to the thread that both of them are BLM supporting Democrats?
Posted on 6/29/20 at 4:14 pm to LoveThatMoney
quote:
STL Public Radio
I'm sure that was very balanced.
If it weren't private, the city had about 140 years to have the gate taken down. It's private.
Posted on 6/29/20 at 4:19 pm to Pisco
quote:
Has the news been broken to the thread that both of them are BLM supporting Democrats?
Except that they aren’t
Posted on 6/29/20 at 4:21 pm to LoveThatMoney
quote:
Because there is an argument that the streets cannot be blocked off in such a fashion in St. Louis. They talked about the ordeal on STL Public Radio and one of the lawyers on there mentioned that it was his understanding that gated or not, you can’t keep pedestrians off the street. So I’ll just put it in quotes and it can be private or otherwise, because the point remains that if they had stayed inside, guns at the ready, no one would even know who they are.
I already provided several links that prove the street is private
Posted on 6/29/20 at 4:33 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
Figured a rich baw like that could afford a more Gucci AR than an M16A2
Or a left handed model, he can afford it
Posted on 6/29/20 at 4:39 pm to LoveThatMoney
quote:
Because there is an argument that the streets cannot be blocked off in such a fashion in St. Louis.
No, there's not. Because it's not a public street. It's private.
quote:
one of the lawyers on there mentioned that it was his understanding that gated or not, you can’t keep pedestrians off the street.
You can when it's private property, to include the roads and sidewalks. Which it is.
Posted on 6/29/20 at 4:53 pm to Centinel
Lol at you dumb fricks thinking this is home defense. They at no point were under any type of attack.
This is a couple of idiots that need to take court appointed courses in gun safety if they want to get their licenses back.
This is a couple of idiots that need to take court appointed courses in gun safety if they want to get their licenses back.
Posted on 6/29/20 at 4:57 pm to whatiknowsofar
quote:And at no point did they shoot at anyone.
They at no point were under any type of attack.
Missouri's "Stand Your Ground Law" allowed them to do exactly what they did. I posted a link to a synopsis of that law earlier in this thread.
quote:Not much, apparently.
whatiknowsofar
Posted on 6/29/20 at 5:02 pm to whatiknowsofar
quote:
Lol at you dumb fricks thinking this is home defense. They at no point were under any type of attack.
They didn’t shoot anyone either.
I agree that these folks are in desperate need of gun safety training. But I don’t understand how anyone can believe that first amendment rights extend to breaking down a gate to enter private property, while second amendment rights don’t extend to your own lawn.
Posted on 6/29/20 at 5:06 pm to LSURussian
quote:
Missouri's "Stand Your Ground Law" allowed them to do exactly what they did. I posted a link to a synopsis of that law earlier in this thread.
I'm well aware of the law. You can't point your fricking gun at people like that unless you're going to fricking shoot them. That is basic 101 shite I'm sure your daddy taught you boy.
Posted on 6/29/20 at 5:09 pm to Pisco
quote:
Democrats?
They aren’t unfortunately
Posted on 6/29/20 at 5:09 pm to whatiknowsofar
quote:Yes you fricking can.
You can't point your fricking gun at people like that unless you're going to fricking shoot them.
Posted on 6/29/20 at 5:10 pm to lostinbr
quote:
while second amendment rights don’t extend to your own lawn.
2a gives no freedom to pointing guns at people.
Now others are going to think this type of shite is acceptable, and the second someone accidentally misfires (thank god that dumb bitch didnt accidentally kill someone) it is going to create a massive 2A shitstorm.
Posted on 6/29/20 at 5:15 pm to LoveThatMoney
quote:
You know what’s sad? If they had just stayed in the house without causing all this ruckus while still holding their firearms so they could, you know, actually defend their house and not their “private” street, all this would’ve been avoided.
They were outside eating dinner when they started getting harrassed. There are pictures of their wine glasses and food behind them online and they also said so in an interview.
Guess they went in to grab the guns and came back out. It's not like they ran out just to start shite.
Posted on 6/29/20 at 5:15 pm to whatiknowsofar
losers like this get paid to stir up concern by any means necessary.
Popular
Back to top


1







