- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Parasites and Cancer
Posted on 1/14/25 at 6:33 am to mmmmmbeeer
Posted on 1/14/25 at 6:33 am to mmmmmbeeer
quote:
Why has no one who’s spent their entire professional careers studying and treating in the field of oncology not thought of ivermectin being the key to understanding cancer?
Because it’s a trillion dollar industry calling parasites cancer.
0
Posted on 1/14/25 at 6:38 am to N2cars
quote:
If your wife isn't taking Tamoxofen, you're a foolish person. (Likely prescribed, depending on genetic composition).
You were given a gift, don't blow it.
We were recommended it, we are choosing not to take it. I'm not suggesting to anyone else to take it or not to, because there is plenty of literature out there both for it and against it.
We spoke to women on Tamoxifen and several had no issues, but several also hated the way it made them feel similar to chemo in that it made their quality of life not worth a shite for the 5-10 years they were taking it. Our Oncologist also admitted that a good portion of her patients have reported back about bad quality of life, because it makes them very fatigued & feeling bad and sore similar to chemo.
Tamoxifen is also linked to heart issues, high blood pressure, and strokes.
Tamoxifen is also a synthetic hormone. Many years ago my wife almost died from a hepatic adenoma that doctors traced back to the birth control pill, because it produces synthetic estrogen. She didn't know she had it until it ruptured, she spent nearly a week in ICU, doctors gave her less than 10% chance of survival. These are reasons why we are choosing not to take Tamoxifen.
Posted on 1/14/25 at 6:41 am to winkchance
quote:
A lot coming out about parasites and cancer and even some studies using Ivermectin to treat, but this knowledge was around in 2015 -16 as far as I can find.
There's a reason big pharma and msm criticized ivermectin so heavily.
The normies will soon learn
Posted on 1/14/25 at 6:49 am to Rip Torn
quote:
That’s because breast cancer is highly treatable through surgery not ivermectin. I hate to burst your bubble and there is a zero percent chance someone with stage 4 pancreatic cancer was cured with ivermectin or any other drug for that matter. IF that person were cancer free it was by the grace of God
I agree on breast cancer being highly treatable via surgery, if caught early, but the rest you are WRONG. Perhaps you missed the part where I said that we actually spoke to these people (you did not) and they went over and even showed their tests results to us (not you).
Has to be Grace of God and that only huh? Couldn't possibly be the alternative medicines/supplements they were taking during that exact time huh? Why would you or anybody for that matter be so against people figuring out alternatives that actually worked for them? I'm not talking about some group suburban moms or uneducated people who watched an influencer on tik-tok speaking anecdotally about what they feel worked. These are real people who did the research after the most prominent prescribed treatments of western medicine failed to cure them, and have tests to prove it.
Posted on 1/14/25 at 7:41 am to Kreg Jennings
There are doctors talking about it. They are being banned from practice or threatened with loosing their licenses. You can research this stuff, you know?
Posted on 1/14/25 at 8:04 am to winkchance
All I know is that a friend in BTR in his mid 70's now was given 3-6 months to live in mid 2020. An PhD animal nutritionist biz friend which his company had formulated special livestock feed for gave him the trick. Ivermectin one day fenben the next. He has been alternating daily ever since His pancreatic cancer tumor is still there, even shrunk some but that is it.
I know several men who have successfully treated prostate cancer with ivermectin an fenben.
I know several men who have successfully treated prostate cancer with ivermectin an fenben.
Posted on 1/14/25 at 8:15 am to QboveTopSecret
quote:
I also used the cayenne regimen
What kind/brand of supplement
Posted on 1/14/25 at 8:46 am to Doug_H
Solid, and makes sense. 
Embracing alternative and holistic therapies is fine and there's solid evidence to support their use.
However, some can cause more harm than good, and always, always talk to your oncologist before starting something on your own.
I pray that your wife continues to do well.
ETA:
The current survival rate for breast cancer (5 years out, age-dependent) is over 85%.
MBC is a different situation.
I'd be happy to read vetted trials with Invermectin...
Embracing alternative and holistic therapies is fine and there's solid evidence to support their use.
However, some can cause more harm than good, and always, always talk to your oncologist before starting something on your own.
I pray that your wife continues to do well.
ETA:
The current survival rate for breast cancer (5 years out, age-dependent) is over 85%.
MBC is a different situation.
I'd be happy to read vetted trials with Invermectin...
This post was edited on 1/14/25 at 8:52 am
Posted on 1/14/25 at 8:58 am to winkchance
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Text:
Prediction:
We will never see an interview with these alleged cancer-cured people along with their test results and their doctors.
Because none of it is real.
I don't think Gibson is lying. I think he believes it. Lots of people do.
Why do so many people think this is real without evidence? I found out by digging into it. It's a simple communication problem with few other variables.
Patient says X. Friend hears Y. Doctor knows Z.
It's all out-of-context (meaning wrong) and "wishful hearing" and a national conspiracy reflex. None of the claims would survive a few simple questions from someone who understands the field.
I hope I'm wrong.
Prove me wrong and I'll help you get out the word so we can cure some cancer.
Not evidence:
1. Clinical trials. They do not predict human effectiveness.
2. Animal trials you heard had happened but did not.
3. A doctor says anonymous patients were cured.
4. The Internet says dozens of people were cured this way but the only example is the one guy on YouTube who at the end says he has no test results to indicate he is cured.
Posted on 1/14/25 at 9:03 am to GumboPot
The whole premise of this thread, and lot of the replies, are patently false.
"There's research, there's proof, doctors are losing their licenses if they talk about it..."
I'd like to meet the guy that could keep an oncologist quiet.
"There's research, there's proof, doctors are losing their licenses if they talk about it..."
I'd like to meet the guy that could keep an oncologist quiet.
Posted on 1/14/25 at 9:22 am to N2cars
quote:
I'd like to meet the guy that could keep an oncologist quiet.
Cancer is complicated and although some people have found that fenbendazole has been effective against some cancers like colorectal cancer it has been totally ineffective against other cancers. With that said it is my understanding that there are much more effective anti-cancer drugs for colorectal cancer with a 90% cure rate than fenbendazole and that's why oncologist do not use it.
But cancer in general is not a one size fits all proposition and that's why it's such a difficult disease to cure. One anti-cancer drug might work one one type of cancer but be totally ineffective on another type.
Furthermore, let's assume that 95% oncologist are corrupt (they are not) and purposely embargoing cheap and available cancer treatments for profit and 5% are using the cheap and available cancer treatments with incredible cure rates. There is no way they could keep the news of these cures suppressed for long.
Posted on 1/14/25 at 10:11 am to Rip Torn
quote:
I hate to burst your bubble and there is a zero percent chance someone with stage 4 pancreatic cancer was cured with ivermectin or any other drug for that matter.
The suggestion that oncologists across the country / world could cure their patients’ cancers with simple, inexpensive treatments but either choose not to out of greed or are too proud or stupid to use Google and try is absolutely nonsensical and asinine. Obviously, SOMEONE would try and would become extraordinarily famous for the miraculous results.
It’s not even worthy of debate.
Doctors are actually taught to let patients try useless unproven or even disproven therapies so long as they are not clearly harmful.
A lot of this stuff falls under that.
This post was edited on 1/14/25 at 10:16 am
Posted on 1/14/25 at 10:14 am to N2cars
quote:
Ask the admins to move this to the "Idiot Board "
He says whilst wearing his facemask and getting his 20th booster.
Posted on 1/14/25 at 10:18 am to GumboPot
quote:
GumboPot
Such irresponsible things for a guy with an audience of millions to say.
Yes, drink the fabric dye. Oncologists are all lying. Take the horse paste. It'll cure your stage 4 pancreatic cancer. Don't trust the establishment. Don't trust the doctors. Listen to me and my non-credentialed guest. We've done the research. We've heard things.
Posted on 1/14/25 at 10:18 am to Norbert
quote:
The suggestion that oncologists across the country could cure their patient’s cancers with simple, inexpensive treatments but either choose not to out of greed or are too proud or stupid to use Google and try is absolutely nonsensical and asinine.
Or... the FDA has no interest in testing Ivermectin/Fenbendazole/etc... and people (doctors) are risk averse. They are living a comfortable life not upsetting the apple cart and they simply are doing what big medicine tells them.
Maybe you can explain this:
Peer-Reviewed Publication of Groundbreaking Cancer Protocol
Johns Hopkins Study: Anti-Parasitic Drug Slows Pancreatic Cancer in Mice
Ivermectin and Fenbendazole in Cancer Care: A Functional Medicine Breakthrough
It's out there. It has been studied. Why is the medical industry demonizing these life saving medicines? Qui bono?
This post was edited on 1/14/25 at 10:24 am
Posted on 1/14/25 at 10:20 am to mmmmmbeeer
quote:
Take the horse paste. It'll cure your stage 4 pancreatic cancer.
Guess you didn't see this. As the third-most lethal cancer in the United States, with only a 1% five-year survival rate for people with its most aggressive form, pancreatic cancer has long been a target of researchers who search for ways to slow or stop its growth and spread. Now, a team of Johns Hopkins Medicine researchers have found that an anti-parasitic drug prevents pancreatic cancer’s initiation, progression and metastasis in genetically engineered mice
or this
We are pleased to announce that the first-of-its-kind protocol utilizing Ivermectin, Mebendazole, and Fenbendazole for cancer treatment has been peer-reviewed and officially published on September 19, 2024.
I find it telling that you use the media's term for ivermectin, and dismiss it completely. Why?
This post was edited on 1/14/25 at 10:23 am
Posted on 1/14/25 at 10:24 am to Norbert
quote:
The suggestion that oncologists across the country / world could cure their patients’ cancers with simple, inexpensive treatments but either choose not to out of greed or are too proud or stupid to use Google and try is absolutely nonsensical and asinine. Obviously, SOMEONE would try and would become extraordinarily famous for the miraculous results.
We all went through covid and saw the medical profession attack Hydroxy, Ivermectin, Zinc etc when some doctors simple said they had seen some good results in their practice and they suggested more investigation and data. We saw state and local government ban the use and sale of some of these drugs. Declaring them dangerous even though they had been used by humans for decades.
We saw doctors go before congress and give testimony and still the established medical industry attacked them. The testimony, I used this and saw this. We may want to look into this further.
My original post was one of interest as this has become a recent topic in the news and oddly people come out of the woodwork to scream that it is false, misleading, a lie, idiocy etc. I did not write any of these studies. They come from multiple sources over a decade or so up to recent weeks. They all speak of positive discoveries, theories, results, bad raise further questions and suggestions but dam some of you people can't even discuss it without attacking people who simple say look at this.
get a grip.
Posted on 1/14/25 at 10:27 am to winkchance
quote:
My original post was one of interest as this has become a recent topic in the news
Which news?
Posted on 1/14/25 at 10:27 am to mmmmmbeeer
quote:
Don't trust the establishment. Don't trust the doctors.
It's strange how you leave something as important as your own health to the "experts" and listen when you are told to not do research yourself.
When you buy a car, do you just take the salesman's word for it?
This post was edited on 1/14/25 at 10:28 am
Posted on 1/14/25 at 10:27 am to mmmmmbeeer
quote:
Which news?
I gave you 2 links. There are 3 above that post as well.
Page 6 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News