- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Obama administration issues transgender bathroom mandate to all public schools
Posted on 5/13/16 at 12:40 pm to Dire Wolf
Posted on 5/13/16 at 12:40 pm to Dire Wolf
quote:
The biggest difference between Cjw and SJW are consertives have passed more of their freedom hating bull shite onto us.
Speaking of freedom, now teen pervs have the freedom to go stare at some 13 yr old girl's naked body while she takes a shower in the locker room.
1
Posted on 5/13/16 at 12:47 pm to yoga girl
quote:
I'm really puzzled by all this. Is it pandering to gay rights activists who no longer have much to do? Is it fricking with those who opposed gay rights, a "we'll show you?"
Everyone laughed when i said that the liberals wouldn't be happy with getting a win in the gay marriage column - they were going to push it even further to normalize trannies and pedophilia. We see the bathroom issue out there, now Salon ran this piece:
Posted on 5/13/16 at 12:49 pm to bamarep
We need TRUMP!!!
Posted on 5/13/16 at 12:54 pm to Horsemeat
quote:
Everyone laughed when i said that the liberals wouldn't be happy with getting a win in the gay marriage column - they were going to push it even further to normalize trannies and pedophilia. We see the bathroom issue out there, now Salon ran this piece
Well, according to progressive dogma, children as young as 5 or 6 can decide what gender they are. They're even allowing children just hitting puberty take hormones to alter their gender.
Using "progressive" thinking, If kids have the right and the mental capacity to make these life altering fundamental changes with their bodies, then by extension they can likewise choose to use their body to engage in sexual activity with whomever they choose.
Sound crazy? Well it should to any sane person. But just wait, it's coming. We're deep inside the rabbit hole now, but it goes much, much deeper.
This post was edited on 5/13/16 at 12:55 pm
Posted on 5/13/16 at 1:04 pm to TJGator1215
Obama nation
Posted on 5/13/16 at 1:08 pm to Speedy G
quote:
Do any of you proggies want to address why the suicide rate of "trans" people are TEN times that of normal people?
quote:
Speedy G: Because of people like you.
I am so damn tired of all of the moronics like this.
Trans is a mental issue. John Hopkins University, the pioneer of sexual reassignment surgery, stops performing the procedure because "There is no medical benefit to the procedure", and Bruce/Caitlyn Jenner announces that he/she is having regrets about the whole sex change, and people still want to act like this is normal and mentally healthy.
Posted on 5/13/16 at 1:09 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
Well, according to progressive dogma, children as young as 5 or 6 can decide what gender they are. They're even allowing children just hitting puberty take hormones to alter their gender
That is not "progressive" dogma - I'm not quite sure whose dogma it is.
I predict they will institute some type of legal action against a financially weak school system that will be an easy target.
This is probably SSM activists who will be out of work unless they work on this, and they likely already had the administration's ear.
Perhaps if the right had been more sympathetic to SSM this wouldn't even be an issue?
I still think we're going through a "it is cool not to be gender unspecific."
Posted on 5/13/16 at 1:22 pm to Salmon
quote:
Spilled Milk: Read the article, all a male student has to say is "I feel like a girl" and they are to be allowed to use the girls RR no questions asked
quote:
Salmon: actually no, the parents have to be the ones that assert it
sorry for ruining the melt though
Even if that is the way Obama is starting it, it won't stay that way for long.
Right now, any Federal employee can tell HR they identify as the opposite sex, and they are allowed to use the other sex's bathroom.
Posted on 5/13/16 at 1:25 pm to Dire Wolf
Those aren't "conservative" things.
Those are big government nanny-state busybody teetotaler laws.
We don't need more laws, but even more we don't need prog brainwashing forced down our children's throats. They are vulnerable to Indoctrination and getting this shite in the schools is Alinsky 101.
Those are big government nanny-state busybody teetotaler laws.
We don't need more laws, but even more we don't need prog brainwashing forced down our children's throats. They are vulnerable to Indoctrination and getting this shite in the schools is Alinsky 101.
Posted on 5/13/16 at 1:27 pm to yoga girl
quote:
Well, according to progressive dogma, children as young as 5 or 6 can decide what gender they are. They're even allowing children just hitting puberty take hormones to alter their gender
That is not "progressive" dogma - I'm not quite sure whose dogma it is.
Look at these headlines from the HuffPo. ( LINK)
You might want to "check your privilege" or your progressive friends will accuse you of being trans-phobic. As you can clearly see from HuffPo, the official progressive line is that transgenderism in kids is to be celebrated and encouraged.
And, as I said before, if progressives think a child can make such a huge decision about their body as changing their gender, then, according to progressive logic, that child also can make other decisions about their body, including sexual decisions.
Posted on 5/13/16 at 1:38 pm to Darth_Vader
I enjoy the Huffpo, but that doesn't mean it is a progressive bible.
Posted on 5/13/16 at 1:39 pm to yoga girl
quote:
I enjoy the Huffpo, but that doesn't mean it is a progressive bible.
It's one of the biggest voices of progressivism in the media today.
Posted on 5/13/16 at 1:42 pm to yoga girl
quote:
I enjoy the Huffpo, but that doesn't mean it is a progressive bible.
And drudge is not a conservative one
Posted on 5/13/16 at 1:43 pm to yoga girl
quote:
I'm really puzzled by all this. Is it pandering to gay rights activists who no longer have much to do? Is it fricking with those who opposed gay rights, a "we'll show you?"
I can't imagine that this has much support in the black community.
It's simple, now that gay marriage is no longer an issue they have to come up with another to energize the base. They see the passion by those on the right for Trump and they need to match it to get people to make the effort to vote. Same reason for the BLM BS.
Posted on 5/13/16 at 2:23 pm to bamarep
If germans, sorry. The Lt. Gov. of Texas, who has announced it will be filing a law suit against this mandate, said that if Texas loses Federal funds as a result, 80% of the Federal money goes to providing breakfast & some lunches for students in need. Point being, the poor will get punished more than any other student. He also said private school enrollment will triple.
Posted on 5/13/16 at 2:36 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
The biggest difference between Cjw and SJW are consertives have passed more of their freedom hating bull shite onto us.
Speaking of freedom, now teen pervs have the freedom to go stare at some 13 yr old girl's naked body while she takes a shower in the locker room.
I actually started a thread on this a while back asking idiots like the one you quoted to cite examples of "conservative" values that have been forced upon us, and which one still stand.
That list was very short outside of "war on drugs".
So, I'll ask again, what "freedom hating BS" are you all referring to?
Posted on 5/13/16 at 2:48 pm to Keltic Tiger
quote:
If germans, sorry. The Lt. Gov. of Texas, who has announced it will be filing a law suit against this mandate, said that if Texas loses Federal funds as a result, 80% of the Federal money goes to providing breakfast & some lunches for students in need. Point being, the poor will get punished more than any other student. He also said private school enrollment will triple.
Thanks for posting. I was wondering how much money Texas schools get from the Feds. Most of the money comes from property taxes which is a state thing.
So I assume if the Feds withhold funds it would not impact my kids school much at all since it's only 10% disadvantaged.
This post was edited on 5/13/16 at 2:49 pm
Posted on 5/13/16 at 2:54 pm to EZE Tiger Fan
quote:
, I'll ask again, what "freedom hating BS" are you all referring to?
On my phone so not listing everything
The "war on drugs" is kind of a big deal
For starters blue laws. Why the am I restricted on buying booze because it's Sunday? Not to mention religion was used to justify prohibition
Euthanasia laws- terminally ill people deserve to die in peace. The rights outrage over this is mystifying to me
Social consertives generally support prison sentence that punishment instead of rehab. Louisiana is a perfect example of how to create repeat criminals and career felons.
Not to mention all the unenforceable outdated laws that still on the books. Like oral sex being banned in states.
For the most part we aren't living under SJW laws just like we aren't a CJW one but outrage cultures are very similar. The worst SJW protestors are no different then the protestors outside of the super dome.
While the SJW of world are protesting at colleges and on tumblr. The worst of the right gets elected by pandering boogie men to people.
This post was edited on 5/13/16 at 3:10 pm
Posted on 5/13/16 at 3:12 pm to Darth_Vader
And as an example of what happens when you dare make light of the issue:
Pizza shop in hot water after posting controversial sign
I am sure the offended 1% will do their best to run this guy out of business for nothing.
Pizza shop in hot water after posting controversial sign
I am sure the offended 1% will do their best to run this guy out of business for nothing.
Posted on 5/13/16 at 3:15 pm to Dire Wolf
quote:
The "war on drugs" is kind of a big deal
I don't disagree. I would legalize almost every damn drug out there.
Do you know what political party started the war on drugs and why?
Hint: It wasn't the "conservative" one.
quote:
Why the am I restricted on buying booze because it's Sunday?
Agreed. These can be voted down.
quote:
Not to mention religion was used to justify prohibition
That doesn't matter anymore. That "conservative" legislation (passed by Democrats, BTW) is long gone.
quote:
Euthanasia laws- terminally ill people deserve to die in peace
I agree here too.
quote:
Social consertives generally support prison sentence that punishment instead of rehab.
This falls under the first item above.
quote:
Not to mention all the unenforceable outdated laws that still on the books. Like oral sex being banned in states.
If they aren't being enforced then I don't care.
So we have essentially two items here, one of which wasn't a "conservative" position at the start.
You need to list more.
It is OK, even the most Progressive, anti everything American "intellectual" politards couldn't come up with much either.
That conservative boogeyman lives in everyone's head, rent free.
PS - I'm a former registered Democrat that is now an IND. I hate Rs, but for different reasons than you or Progressives do.
Page 16 of 19
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News