Started By
Message

re: No matter what direction we point a telescope, we always look toward the Big Bang - why?

Posted on 7/28/22 at 12:28 pm to
Posted by squid_hunt
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2021
11272 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 12:28 pm to
quote:


And what is the natural, scientific, observable solution?

Ha. You first.

My explanation is God spoke and created the universe in six days. He is the creator of everything and the redeemer of my soul.

But you don't have a better solution, only an unworkable, unproveable theory.
Posted by SoonerK
Member since Nov 2021
1014 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 12:28 pm to
quote:

Thats why people don't buy the "earth is billions of years old".

How old is the Earth and how did you come by that conclusion?
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
130289 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 12:28 pm to
quote:

Thats why people don't buy the "earth is billions of years old". If the earth has always been 94 million miles from the sun, just how small was the earth and the sun 4.5 billion years ago when our planet "expanded" out of empty space and would become "earth"? And then it took 4.5 billion years for it to expand to the size it is today?


The frick
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
29105 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

Thats why people don't buy the "earth is billions of years old". If the earth has always been 94 million miles from the sun, just how small was the earth and the sun 4.5 billion years ago when our planet "expanded" out of empty space and would become "earth"? And then it took 4.5 billion years for it to expand to the size it is today?
I can see why you don't buy it. You completely misunderstand the concept.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
130289 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

Ha. You first.

My explanation is God spoke and created the universe in six days. He is the creator of everything and the redeemer of my soul.

But you don't have a better solution, only an unworkable, unproveable theory.



We base ours on observable data. No theory can be "proven" because its not math.

You base yours on nothing whatsoever, therefore its not worth having a conversation with someone as deeply mentally disturbed as you are.
Posted by little billy
Orange County, CA
Member since May 2015
8469 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 12:32 pm to
quote:

What if its true that the early Church Fathers were correct that the earth is the center of the universe.


Spoiler alert: it's not.
Posted by squid_hunt
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2021
11272 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 12:34 pm to
quote:


We base ours on observable data. No theory can be "proven" because its not math.

Whatever justification you need. Your beliefs are a choice. They're not fact based. You choose what theories to accept or dismiss, which is your choice, but you should stop pretending like you value science because your theory is unscientific by definition
Posted by Wiener
Member since Apr 2019
112 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

Science is wrong, more than it is right. They are going to have Universe evolution pretty wrong in the end. It is scary how many people here that do not question it and just regurgitate what they have been told or read by our "experts"

The more you keep saying this the more I don't think you understand what science is and how it works. Of course some proposed explanations are not correct, they get refined and reworked to incorporate new findings. That doesn't change that what we know today is far more than we knew some time ago. To sit around Monday morning quarterbacking the process from an armchair doesn't make you come off as more intelligent than the people working to figure it out.
quote:

Are these the same people that came up with more than 2 genders

Ah, the strawman argument. Yes, astronomers sit around writing gender theory papers as well. Got 'em!
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
130289 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 12:37 pm to
quote:

They're not fact based


They are.

They are based on observable data.

This is the old game from lunatics, trying to equate supernatural with the natural by saying "its all just theories".

They are not equivalent. The end.
Posted by PrimeTime Money
Houston, Texas, USA
Member since Nov 2012
28022 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 12:38 pm to
Space blows my mind. I can’t comprehend it.
Posted by squid_hunt
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2021
11272 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 12:39 pm to
quote:

They are based on observable data.

Ok. So how old do you believe the universe to be?
Posted by SoonerK
Member since Nov 2021
1014 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

Ok. So how old do you believe the universe to be?


How old do you believe earth to be?
Posted by ThinePreparedAni
In a sea of cognitive dissonance
Member since Mar 2013
11315 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 12:43 pm to
quote:

Because that’s how God made it


quote:

As Terence McKenna observed, 'Modern science is based on the principle: Give us one free miracle and we'll explain the rest.' The one free miracle is the appearance of all the mass and energy in the universe and all the laws that govern it in a single instant from nothing."

-- Rupert Sheldrake, Morphic Resonance: The Nature of Formative Causation




Posted by squid_hunt
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2021
11272 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 12:45 pm to
quote:


They are not equivalent. The end.

Naturalism is just an excuse to pretend you are rational and fact based. But what we're seeing is even physicists are abandoning their own laws to embrace theories that fit the facts. The silliness of your hostility to me is obvious. I stayed 100% in the rational and ripped your beiief system to shreds because you understand that if the universe is bigger than 13.8 then your model is broken. I'm sure we'll come up with a new set of rules to hold it together, like dark matter does, but Korkstand already demonstrated you guys are willing to cheat to save the science.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
130289 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

Ok. So how old do you believe the universe to be?


Based on the data we have now, the OBSERVABLE universe is approximately 13.77 billion years old. I can only base it on what we know and what is observable.

As our technology expands, so would what is observable, so could our understanding of this timeline, which would all be great.
Posted by squid_hunt
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2021
11272 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

How old do you believe earth to be?

Just answer the question.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
130289 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 12:47 pm to
quote:

ripped your beiief system to shreds



You did no such thing. Everything you have said has been total nonsense with little understanding of the actual science.
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
29105 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 12:47 pm to
quote:

Whatever justification you need. Your beliefs are a choice. They're not fact based. You choose what theories to accept or dismiss, which is your choice, but you should stop pretending like you value science because your theory is unscientific by definition
You very obviously do not understand science.
Posted by squid_hunt
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2021
11272 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 12:47 pm to
quote:

Based on the data we have now, the OBSERVABLE universe is approximately 13.77 billion years old.


That's an unreasonable answer unless you are willing to say we are at the center.
Posted by squid_hunt
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2021
11272 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 12:48 pm to
quote:

You very obviously do not understand science.

No, I do. But I believe in God and the his word. You're the one talking about light jumping to a convenient location without cause.
Jump to page
Page First 6 7 8 9 10 ... 13
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 13Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram