re: No matter what direction we point a telescope, we always look toward the Big Bang - why?

quote:

---

Why do you think science is limited by our senses?

---

Group A: Known knowns - well quantified by science
Group B: Known unknowns - sometimes acknowledged by science, sometimes mischaracterized /ignored
Group C: Unknown unknowns - science is unaware and will struggle to ever understand/perceive/quantify

Examples:

Group B issues: junk DNA, dark matter. Made up constructs to make our current best understanding fit instead of acknowledging that we do not fully understand (or flat out have the wrong model)

Group C issues:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=iiWKq57uAlk

quote:

---

Flatland & the 4th Dimension - Carl Sagan 591 Likes 41,541 Views 2014 Sep 6 Have you heard of flatland? Sit back and let one of the masters of science communication take you on a journey into Flatland and the 4th dimension.

---

My issues with the Big Bang (aka the big ejaculation) is as follow:

-what preceded it
-where did the prima materia originate from
-what catalyzed the bang

My images in prior post suggested fractal relationship with the small (Bohr model of atom) and the large (celestial orbits of the planets in our solar system) and comet assisted panspermia and a sperm fertilizing an egg.

Godless and soulless high priests of scientism tend to label anything they cannot quantify as essentially non-existent (telepathy, paranormal. UAP, etc)

My personal belief: Big Bang, evolution, etc are all part of the workings of intelligent design. Who or what the designer is is the real inquiry

quote:

---

quote:The farthest galaxy that Webb has already identified is causing some issues with the Big Bang theory. I don’t have the specifics

---

Here’s your specifics. Like you’ll even understand them

LINK /

LINK /

LINK

And here’s an article on the censorship jackass

LINK /

quote:

---

Because the universe is 14billion years old and the earth is only 4 billion years old. A lot of universe passed us by before we even existed.

---

How was there stuff lagging 10 billion years behind the rest of the expanding universe? Did the matter we were made from take a pause?

the Big Bang is insultingly simplistic

quote:

---

Here’s your specifics. Like you’ll even understand them

LINK /

LINK /

LINK

---

Absolutely none of that is causing "issues" for the BBT. The telescope is doing exactly what it's supposed to do.

You might be dumber than the flat earth folks.

quote:

---

And here’s an article on the censorship jackass

LINK /

---

It's not "censorship" if the repository (arXiv in this case) has a moderation policy and follows it. Here is a link to their policy on declining submissions.