Started By
Message

re: Navy details separation process for transgender personnel - deadline approaching fast.

Posted on 3/18/25 at 10:30 am to
Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
92183 posts
Posted on 3/18/25 at 10:30 am to
quote:

was or is an Admiral


thought it was an appointee with a made up rank/title?
Posted by RolltidePA
North Carolina
Member since Dec 2010
5599 posts
Posted on 3/18/25 at 10:30 am to
quote:

He was or is an Admiral in the National Health Service.



Was. That role is a presidential appointment. He went out with Biden.
Posted by travelgamer
Member since Aug 2024
2804 posts
Posted on 3/18/25 at 10:35 am to
you are a weak fat man behind a keyboard, come find me shammu.

Meant at 777 the loser.
This post was edited on 3/18/25 at 10:38 am
Posted by jizzle6609
Houston
Member since Jul 2009
20035 posts
Posted on 3/18/25 at 10:36 am to
quote:

so are women in combat arms


100% agreed.

Support roles only.

Let the men die.
Posted by 6R12
Louisiana
Member since Feb 2005
11940 posts
Posted on 3/18/25 at 10:37 am to
How did we let this go on for so long without a kickback? This got out of hand years ago. Thankfully we have started restoring some sort of rational thinking in our leaders.
Posted by travelgamer
Member since Aug 2024
2804 posts
Posted on 3/18/25 at 10:42 am to
777Tiger
sissy
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
73580 posts
Posted on 3/18/25 at 10:51 am to
quote:

“The medical, surgical, and mental health constraints on individuals who have a current diagnosis or history of, or exhibit symptoms consistent with, gender dysphoria are incompatible with the high mental and physical standards necessary for military service,” the memo read.


It’s sad this even has to be said.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
73580 posts
Posted on 3/18/25 at 10:55 am to
quote:

Meanwhile the military is facing a recruitment crisis.


As usual, you’re wrong…

quote:

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Army expects to meet its enlistment goals for 2025, marking a dramatic turnaround for a service that has struggled for several years to bring in enough young people and has undergone a major overhaul of its recruiting programs.

LINK
Posted by BradBallard
Wilmington, Delaware
Member since Jun 2020
567 posts
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:40 am to
Probably should be a case by case basis. My daughter is a youngster at USNA, and she knows the first openly trans student who graduated in 2023 (female to male) from the Academy since this student was on the triathlon team that my daughter is now a part of.

- He graduated top 10 in the class
- by all appearances is excelling at flight school
- was top 5 at nationals senior year
- has had a mastectomy, but no hormones such as testosterone or other surgeries yet since He (she) still competes in the woman’s division and holds a pro card in triathlon. No advantage other than being born with a absurd VO2Max

By all measure, he was a model Midshipman and model officer as well as an elite athlete.

Everyone speaks very highly of him, and he’s not what you call an advocate in anyway.
Posted by N2cars
Member since Feb 2008
39577 posts
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:42 am to
Nope.
Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
92183 posts
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:44 am to
quote:

Nope.


double nope, the hell with that freak
Posted by jizzle6609
Houston
Member since Jul 2009
20035 posts
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:57 am to
quote:

double nope, the hell with that freak


Can’t risk it. She might radicalize.
Posted by Tarps99
Lafourche Parish
Member since Apr 2017
12646 posts
Posted on 3/18/25 at 12:18 pm to
quote:

so are women in combat arms

I was deployed in Iraq with female soldiers in our unit. I've said this before; It created a dynamic that wasn't aligned with increased lethality.


How would a division of specially trained women in combat assigned to specific platoons that work together enough their “biological clocks” sync up and we deploy them once a month for 7-10 days?


We can call it the Amazonian Brigade.
This post was edited on 3/18/25 at 12:28 pm
Posted by StanSmith
Member since May 2018
1106 posts
Posted on 3/18/25 at 12:41 pm to
Can't fix crazy.

Posted by Sam Quint
Member since Sep 2022
8841 posts
Posted on 3/18/25 at 1:26 pm to
quote:

100% agreed.

Support roles only.

Let the men die.

they're only marginally better in support roles
Posted by Grievous Angel
Tuscaloosa, AL
Member since Dec 2008
10888 posts
Posted on 3/18/25 at 1:33 pm to
quote:

I'll bet if you did a little digging and/or got creative you could


quote:

But the biggest contributor to the VA’s steadily expanding budget has been the unprecedented increase in veterans’ enrollment in disability compensation, a VA program designed to compensate America’s veterans for injuries incurred or aggravated during their military service. The share of veterans receiving disability compensation benefits is increasing rapidly and is at an all-time high. Between 1954 and 2000, the share of veterans receiving disability compensation was very stable, fluctuating between 8 percent and 10 percent. Today, nearly 30 percent of the country’s 18.5 million veterans receive it.



quote:

Veterans who enlisted since 2010 have some of the highest rates of disability compensation enrollment even though they were significantly less likely to deploy and faced a substantially lower risk of injury while deployed — only 1 percent of Army service members who enlisted between 2010 and 2015 were wounded in combat.


LINK

Don't let facts get in the way. I'm all for Veterans getting what they legitimately deserve, whether it's the GI bill, legitimate disability, and whatever else they deserve. And the ones that did serve and don't abuse the system should speak up as well.


Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
92183 posts
Posted on 3/18/25 at 1:36 pm to
quote:

Don't let facts get in the way.


wtf do you mean by that? although I was just joking what you posted sort of goes along with the joke
Posted by Klark Kent
Houston via BR
Member since Jan 2008
74812 posts
Posted on 3/18/25 at 1:44 pm to
quote:

Meanwhile the military is facing a recruitment crisis.


since January? i doubt it.

got any evidence to support this?
Posted by Philzilla
Member since Nov 2011
2212 posts
Posted on 3/18/25 at 1:47 pm to
quote:

Considering that trans personnel are non-deployable

Is this true?
I thought being non-deployable made you ineligible to serve?
As long as you status was not service connected that is.
Posted by Grievous Angel
Tuscaloosa, AL
Member since Dec 2008
10888 posts
Posted on 3/18/25 at 1:48 pm to
I replied to your post but was really replying to the dude that took exception to my statement. You said "there are creative ways" and that's exactly the point.



He's free to do that (take exception to my statement), but I'm not talking about folks like him, who served and got no disability, or served and got legitimate disability.

I'm talking about the explosion of disability claims that have occurred recently, as the article points out. It's like any other government program: full of fraud, waste, and abuse.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram