- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Navy details separation process for transgender personnel - deadline approaching fast.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 10:30 am to chinhoyang
Posted on 3/18/25 at 10:30 am to chinhoyang
quote:
was or is an Admiral
thought it was an appointee with a made up rank/title?
Posted on 3/18/25 at 10:30 am to chinhoyang
quote:
He was or is an Admiral in the National Health Service.
Was. That role is a presidential appointment. He went out with Biden.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 10:35 am to travelgamer
you are a weak fat man behind a keyboard, come find me shammu.
Meant at 777 the loser.
Meant at 777 the loser.
This post was edited on 3/18/25 at 10:38 am
Posted on 3/18/25 at 10:36 am to Sam Quint
quote:
so are women in combat arms
100% agreed.
Support roles only.
Let the men die.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 10:37 am to CollegeFBRules
How did we let this go on for so long without a kickback? This got out of hand years ago. Thankfully we have started restoring some sort of rational thinking in our leaders.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 10:51 am to CollegeFBRules
quote:
“The medical, surgical, and mental health constraints on individuals who have a current diagnosis or history of, or exhibit symptoms consistent with, gender dysphoria are incompatible with the high mental and physical standards necessary for military service,” the memo read.
It’s sad this even has to be said.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 10:55 am to c on z
quote:
Meanwhile the military is facing a recruitment crisis.
As usual, you’re wrong…
quote:
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Army expects to meet its enlistment goals for 2025, marking a dramatic turnaround for a service that has struggled for several years to bring in enough young people and has undergone a major overhaul of its recruiting programs.
LINK
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:40 am to chinhoyang
Probably should be a case by case basis. My daughter is a youngster at USNA, and she knows the first openly trans student who graduated in 2023 (female to male) from the Academy since this student was on the triathlon team that my daughter is now a part of.
- He graduated top 10 in the class
- by all appearances is excelling at flight school
- was top 5 at nationals senior year
- has had a mastectomy, but no hormones such as testosterone or other surgeries yet since He (she) still competes in the woman’s division and holds a pro card in triathlon. No advantage other than being born with a absurd VO2Max
By all measure, he was a model Midshipman and model officer as well as an elite athlete.
Everyone speaks very highly of him, and he’s not what you call an advocate in anyway.
- He graduated top 10 in the class
- by all appearances is excelling at flight school
- was top 5 at nationals senior year
- has had a mastectomy, but no hormones such as testosterone or other surgeries yet since He (she) still competes in the woman’s division and holds a pro card in triathlon. No advantage other than being born with a absurd VO2Max
By all measure, he was a model Midshipman and model officer as well as an elite athlete.
Everyone speaks very highly of him, and he’s not what you call an advocate in anyway.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:44 am to N2cars
quote:
Nope.
double nope, the hell with that freak
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:57 am to 777Tiger
quote:
double nope, the hell with that freak
Can’t risk it. She might radicalize.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 12:18 pm to RolltidePA
quote:
so are women in combat arms
I was deployed in Iraq with female soldiers in our unit. I've said this before; It created a dynamic that wasn't aligned with increased lethality.
How would a division of specially trained women in combat assigned to specific platoons that work together enough their “biological clocks” sync up and we deploy them once a month for 7-10 days?
We can call it the Amazonian Brigade.
This post was edited on 3/18/25 at 12:28 pm
Posted on 3/18/25 at 1:26 pm to jizzle6609
quote:
100% agreed.
Support roles only.
Let the men die.
they're only marginally better in support roles
Posted on 3/18/25 at 1:33 pm to 777Tiger
quote:
I'll bet if you did a little digging and/or got creative you could
quote:
But the biggest contributor to the VA’s steadily expanding budget has been the unprecedented increase in veterans’ enrollment in disability compensation, a VA program designed to compensate America’s veterans for injuries incurred or aggravated during their military service. The share of veterans receiving disability compensation benefits is increasing rapidly and is at an all-time high. Between 1954 and 2000, the share of veterans receiving disability compensation was very stable, fluctuating between 8 percent and 10 percent. Today, nearly 30 percent of the country’s 18.5 million veterans receive it.
quote:
Veterans who enlisted since 2010 have some of the highest rates of disability compensation enrollment even though they were significantly less likely to deploy and faced a substantially lower risk of injury while deployed — only 1 percent of Army service members who enlisted between 2010 and 2015 were wounded in combat.
LINK
Don't let facts get in the way. I'm all for Veterans getting what they legitimately deserve, whether it's the GI bill, legitimate disability, and whatever else they deserve. And the ones that did serve and don't abuse the system should speak up as well.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 1:36 pm to Grievous Angel
quote:
Don't let facts get in the way.
wtf do you mean by that? although I was just joking what you posted sort of goes along with the joke
Posted on 3/18/25 at 1:44 pm to c on z
quote:
Meanwhile the military is facing a recruitment crisis.
since January? i doubt it.
got any evidence to support this?
Posted on 3/18/25 at 1:47 pm to RolltidePA
quote:
Considering that trans personnel are non-deployable
Is this true?
I thought being non-deployable made you ineligible to serve?
As long as you status was not service connected that is.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 1:48 pm to 777Tiger
I replied to your post but was really replying to the dude that took exception to my statement. You said "there are creative ways" and that's exactly the point.
He's free to do that (take exception to my statement), but I'm not talking about folks like him, who served and got no disability, or served and got legitimate disability.
I'm talking about the explosion of disability claims that have occurred recently, as the article points out. It's like any other government program: full of fraud, waste, and abuse.
He's free to do that (take exception to my statement), but I'm not talking about folks like him, who served and got no disability, or served and got legitimate disability.
I'm talking about the explosion of disability claims that have occurred recently, as the article points out. It's like any other government program: full of fraud, waste, and abuse.
Popular
Back to top


1







