Started By
Message

re: NASA's making a big exoplanet announcement TODAY, 11AM. Link to Presser in OP

Posted on 7/22/15 at 11:28 pm to
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 7/22/15 at 11:28 pm to
quote:

This is a valid point. It is not theoretically impossible to travel fast than light.



That and the fact that basic science has only been started to be openly questioned for less than 200 years. Almost all scientists in history are currently living. Can't say that for many other professions.
This post was edited on 7/22/15 at 11:30 pm
Posted by SmackoverHawg
Member since Oct 2011
31777 posts
Posted on 7/22/15 at 11:30 pm to
Exactly. The only "proof" that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light are theories. We don't know jack shite.
Posted by eScott
Member since Oct 2008
11376 posts
Posted on 7/23/15 at 5:42 am to
quote:

I just love how the ignorant pop off shite they don't have a clue what they're talking about.


Read what I quoted dumbass.
Posted by Pectus
Internet
Member since Apr 2010
67302 posts
Posted on 7/23/15 at 6:06 am to
quote:

Because we know the types of chemicals biology produces. It can be measured in the atmosphere. We know what types of environments life at large can withstand. That's why we'd know.


Well, we can remote sense the elements that are composing a body...but we've found organic molecules that are abiogenically produced. Such as gas clouds of ethane and methane.
Posted by bencoleman
RIP 7/19
Member since Feb 2009
37887 posts
Posted on 7/23/15 at 6:55 am to
This would be different. If the planet's atmosphere is similar to ours it's pretty much a given. I think most people won't realize the significance of this discovery.
Posted by Not Cooper
Member since Jun 2015
5051 posts
Posted on 7/23/15 at 7:47 am to
quote:

The only "proof" that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light are theories. We don't know jack shite.


Man we've got some bright cookies on this board. Ever heard of a guy named Einstein? Or the theory of relativity? Maybe you should read a book or something. First off, your "insight" on walking forward in a ship moving the speed of light is not groundbreaking. RELATIVITY. The speed of light is the same for all observers. If you are traveling at the speed of light (or say 99.999% the speed of light, because it is impossible for a massive object to even reach the speed of light) you would see light as moving away from you at c. i.e. in your reference frame you are stationary. Walking forward would give you a velocity of a few miles per hour.

This is a scientific fact, if it were true that it is even possible to travel faster than light, all laws of causality would be broken, and the universe wouldn't make much sense at all.

The science tells us that the closer a massive object gets to the speed of light, the more energy it takes to accelerate that object. The energy required to take a massive object to c is literally infinite. You cannot accelerate a massive object to the speed of light. Much less past it.
Posted by SouthMSReb
Member since Dec 2013
4769 posts
Posted on 7/23/15 at 7:59 am to
quote:

The only people that would care are those with a genuine interest in this field. Which, sadly, are few and far between.


I think that's because it's extremely difficult to understand/grasp.

I'm no fool, I'd consider myself to be above average intelligence, but I just can't understand the whole "relativity" bit.
Posted by Lou Pai
Member since Dec 2014
29646 posts
Posted on 7/23/15 at 8:01 am to
Just perusing the reddit thread on this, it seems that people are getting their hopes up a little bit. I don't really know anything about this concept, but the telescope apparently doesn't have the ability to detect atmospheric composition for planets.
Posted by SidewalkDawg
Chair
Member since Nov 2012
10308 posts
Posted on 7/23/15 at 8:05 am to
quote:

Exactly. The only "proof" that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light are theories. We don't know jack shite.


There are no theories, ideas, mathematical equations that are known for travelling faster than light. Light speed is relative. If you were on a ship moving the speed of light and you flipped a light switch, light would behave the same way it did if you were in a room at your house. It is moving RELATIVE to the ship and you. Motion and Speed in space can only happen RELATIVE to something.
Posted by zelman
Bogan Walk
Member since Feb 2015
2400 posts
Posted on 7/23/15 at 8:10 am to
you can't move at the speed of light. it is a physical impossibility. The only way space travel is going to be possible is if they do like they did in Aliens and somehow were able to freeze the bodies, shoot the rocket at planet x , and reanimate them after y amount of years when they get to the planet.
Posted by CoachDon
Louisville
Member since Sep 2014
12409 posts
Posted on 7/23/15 at 8:11 am to
One of the reasons that prevent any object with a mass going at or faster than the speed of light is that the mass is not constant - it increases with velocity and it goes to infinity at the speed of light. So that eventually you need infinite amounts of energy to accelerate infinite mass past the speed of light mark! (and as far as I know we have yet to find an infinite source of energy).
brainiacs!
Posted by SidewalkDawg
Chair
Member since Nov 2012
10308 posts
Posted on 7/23/15 at 8:13 am to
quote:

you can't move at the speed of light. it is a physical impossibility. The only way space travel is going to be possible is if they do like they did in Aliens and somehow were able to freeze the bodies, shoot the rocket at planet x , and reanimate them after y amount of years when they get to the planet.


Moving absolute C is impossible simply because we have Mass.

Moving close to C, not so much with the proper power generation.

There are also theories for devices that warp space-time to get around the limitations of C.

Even more, there are some pretty far fetched ideas which could gain ground with the right breakthrough. Einstein-Rosen bridges for example.
Posted by AUCE05
Member since Dec 2009
45429 posts
Posted on 7/23/15 at 8:17 am to
OP. Start a new thread about aliens, and let these guys have this one for the speed of light convo. We might have life, and you guys can't get over how fast we can travel.
Posted by Not Cooper
Member since Jun 2015
5051 posts
Posted on 7/23/15 at 8:19 am to
quote:

I'm no fool, I'd consider myself to be above average intelligence, but I just can't understand the whole "relativity" bit.


It's not an easy concept to grasp. On earth, every velocity we see is measured relative to the ground, which is taken as stationary. In outer space, we have no stationary reference point, so saying something is moving at 50 miles per hour in space is meaningless. We have to have some object that we consider stationary to reference this velocity to. In relativity, it does not matter how fast you are going, because in your reference frame you are sitting still and everything else is moving. (just like if you are in a car, you could just as easily say "im sitting still and the trees are moving past me").

So, Einstien's relativity says that in any reference frame, no matter what it's velocity is, the speed of light is a constant.
Posted by Rhino5
Atlanta
Member since Nov 2014
30970 posts
Posted on 7/23/15 at 8:21 am to
Unfortunately the new planet is populated with man-bear-pigs.
Posted by Nuts4LSU
Washington, DC
Member since Oct 2003
25468 posts
Posted on 7/23/15 at 8:22 am to
quote:

So we have a long way to go before we can pack up and move planets.
Understatement of the century. Will be 1 zillion times easier to find the planet than it will be to find the means to get there.


And 1 zillion times easier still just to take care of the one we're already on.
Posted by Not Cooper
Member since Jun 2015
5051 posts
Posted on 7/23/15 at 8:23 am to
quote:

Start a new thread about aliens


If you bring up aliens, someone is going to ask how do we get to them, and then some brainy fella will say "hey, easy, we just travel faster than light" and then this whole discussion will start all over again.
Posted by CoachDon
Louisville
Member since Sep 2014
12409 posts
Posted on 7/23/15 at 8:24 am to
quote:

There are also theories for devices that warp space-time to get around the limitations of C.



NASA DISCUSSION - eMDRIVE TECHNOLOGY (WARP)

eMDRIVE - NASA DISCOVERY
Posted by AUCE05
Member since Dec 2009
45429 posts
Posted on 7/23/15 at 8:25 am to
Hey, man. We figured that out in the 50s. Lucas told me so
This post was edited on 7/23/15 at 8:26 am
Posted by SidewalkDawg
Chair
Member since Nov 2012
10308 posts
Posted on 7/23/15 at 8:26 am to
quote:

eMDRIVE


Yes I'm following this development with interest.

I've given up hope that it warps space-time. However there is still a chance that it could be a propellantless propulsion device.
Jump to page
Page First 9 10 11 12 13 ... 22
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 11 of 22Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram