- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: NASA scientist claims discovery of “new force” that counteracts gravity with no fuel
Posted on 3/31/26 at 4:29 am to hawgfaninc
Posted on 3/31/26 at 4:29 am to hawgfaninc
A little late according to the documentary I watched in 1985, but I’ve been looking forward to this for so long I’ll let it slide.
1
Posted on 3/31/26 at 4:45 am to hawgfaninc
How did he get the quantum data?
Posted on 3/31/26 at 6:18 am to hawgfaninc
Why do I feel like this is going to be another instance where we read about some amazing breakthrough on here and then nothing ever comes of it?
Posted on 3/31/26 at 6:18 am to cssamerican
quote:
little late according to the documentary I watched in 1985, but I’ve been looking forward to this for so long I’ll let it slide.
Hello McFry…Back to the Future 2 came out in 1989, not 1985. 1985 was when the first movie came out and they went back to the year 1955. BTTF2 they went to 2015, where flying cars and hoverboards were the norm.
Hopefully that fixes your space time continuum.
This post was edited on 3/31/26 at 6:20 am
Posted on 3/31/26 at 6:21 am to greygoose
quote:
Hot Damn! We are finally going to find out how the pyramids were built!
Uhhh we already know how they were built.
Aliens. They have better equipment that we have.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 6:55 am to GRTiger
quote:
Sounds he doesn't necessarily trust the peer review process.
Or that he's a kook.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 8:00 am to hawgfaninc
The important question:
When do we get truly flying cars out of this?
When do we get truly flying cars out of this?
Posted on 3/31/26 at 8:08 am to hawgfaninc
:idontknowwhybutibelievehimyo:
This post was edited on 3/31/26 at 8:09 am
Posted on 3/31/26 at 8:13 am to Bard
Demonstrating this force in a small vacuum environment does not mean we’re anywhere close to large scale propulsion, but it is pretty badass.
Maybe in the next 30-50 years we’ll have something useful built using this.
Maybe in the next 30-50 years we’ll have something useful built using this.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 8:16 am to hawgfaninc
The truth is out there.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 9:29 am to Penrod
quote:
It’s almost always the sign of a nut. Maybe he was sound at one time and has drifted toward insanity.
Everyone thinks you're crazy right up until you change the world. Many such examples in history.
quote:
GENEVA (AP) — Scientists in Geneva took some antiprotons out for a spin — a very delicate one — in a truck, in a never-tried-before test drive that has been deemed a success.
If this so-called antimatter had come into contact with actual matter, even for a fraction of an instant, it would have been annihilated in a quick flash of energy. So experts at the European Organization for Nuclear Research, known as CERN, had to be extra careful when they took 92 antiprotons on the road for a short ride on Tuesday.
Someone posted this to the OT last week, as well.
So, in one week we learn about anti-matter tech and the vacuum tubes stage of what might legit be an impulse engine....
If my math is right, we're about 4 years away from Zefram Cochrane being born, and 37 years away from mankinds first warp flight....Good to know we're on schedule, tech wise.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 9:40 am to TigerFanatic99
quote:
If this had legs, almost nothing would be bigger news right now.
The fact that he is citing Thomas Townsend Brown is all you need to know this is total kookery.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 9:41 am to hawgfaninc
quote:
New force
LSD
No vacuum req’d.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 11:56 am to hawgfaninc
I guess they finally reversed engineered the craft Bob Lazare was working on.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 12:20 pm to ATrillionaire
Maybe, I have no idea. The poster said they couldn't even fathom a reason why a scientist would do it that way. I simply pointed out that they didn't need to hurt themselves fathoming when the reason was given.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 12:28 pm to GRTiger
quote:
The poster said they couldn't even fathom a reason why a scientist would do it that way.
He said well respected scientist. Important distinction.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 12:32 pm to FutureMikeVIII
Cool. I don't know the guy, but I'm clearly talking to people who do and already have an opinion. My bad for thinking his confusion wasn't just message board rhetoric.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 12:37 pm to GRTiger
quote:
The poster said they couldn't even fathom a reason why a scientist would do it that way. I simply pointed out that they didn't need to hurt themselves fathoming when the reason was given.
Yes, but science is collaborative and requires review. To reject it is a serious red flag.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 12:38 pm to hawgfaninc
Did they call it Element 115 yet?
Posted on 3/31/26 at 12:42 pm to ATrillionaire
That's certainly the idea. Science should also be free of bias, agendas, and outside influence. We know that isn't happening.
Regardless of this guy's hackery, I don't blame anyone for doubting these institutions these days.
Regardless of this guy's hackery, I don't blame anyone for doubting these institutions these days.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News