- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Name a celebrity that will legitimately hurt your feeling once they pass?
Posted on 6/28/24 at 9:09 pm to OWLFAN86
Posted on 6/28/24 at 9:09 pm to OWLFAN86
They're not overrated.
You don't have to like their music. That's fine. But to call them overrated shows a lack of understanding and appreciation for what they truly accomplished They are the greatest and most(still) influential band ever.
I will give you that they were pop-py in their formative years, but from 65-on they were rock. You can make a case that Helter Skelter is the first heavy metal song.
You don't have to like their music. That's fine. But to call them overrated shows a lack of understanding and appreciation for what they truly accomplished They are the greatest and most(still) influential band ever.
I will give you that they were pop-py in their formative years, but from 65-on they were rock. You can make a case that Helter Skelter is the first heavy metal song.
1
Posted on 6/28/24 at 9:09 pm to SoFla Tideroller
Posted on 6/28/24 at 9:16 pm to OWLFAN86
You can call them a pop band, but you can’t call them overated.
Posted on 6/28/24 at 9:18 pm to dukke v
Exactly.
To be fair, from 65 on they were rock.
To be fair, from 65 on they were rock.
This post was edited on 6/28/24 at 9:19 pm
Posted on 6/28/24 at 9:20 pm to Wildcat98USA
Chuck Norris
Willie Nelson
Willie Nelson
Posted on 6/28/24 at 9:21 pm to Wildcat98USA
Norm Macdonald was a gut punch
Posted on 6/28/24 at 9:24 pm to dukke v
quote:
You can call them a pop band, but you can’t call them overated.
Yep.. as odd as it seems, the Beatles are actually UNDERRATED .
The things they did while only being together (and really bigtime) for only like 6 or 7 yrs is remarkable.. i still can’t believe the same group sang I Wanna Hold Ur Hand in ‘64 , then like 2 or 3 yrs later were recording Rubber Soul and Revolver.. then Sgt Pepper.. it doesn’t even make sense, it defies logic.. the sheer quality and quantity of their output was insane .. we will never see anything like it if the world continues on for another 5000 years .
Posted on 6/28/24 at 9:24 pm to dukke v
I can do what I want you crazy bastard
This post was edited on 6/28/24 at 9:25 pm
Posted on 6/28/24 at 9:27 pm to SteelerBravesDawg
i like the Beatles , i do
But so much of it people talk about the Beatles and it was actually George Martin and it was such a small window of time
McCartney has longevity but Lennon so much crap after the Beatles broke up which is bad
I actually have more respect for George Harrison Post Beatles than any of them
But so much of it people talk about the Beatles and it was actually George Martin and it was such a small window of time
McCartney has longevity but Lennon so much crap after the Beatles broke up which is bad
I actually have more respect for George Harrison Post Beatles than any of them
Posted on 6/28/24 at 9:27 pm to OWLFAN86
True….
Posted on 6/28/24 at 9:33 pm to Wildcat98USA
Ric Flair
Wooooooo!
Wooooooo!
Posted on 6/28/24 at 9:36 pm to Wildcat98USA
Paul Simon
Posted on 6/28/24 at 9:36 pm to CARCEMONT
Duane Allman. Man the music he could have made for 50 years.
Posted on 6/28/24 at 9:51 pm to CSATiger
quote:
Paul Simon
That one will be big for me.. one of my musical heroes.. feel fortunate i got to see him not too long ago, though he was past his prime it was still a great show .
Posted on 6/28/24 at 9:53 pm to OWLFAN86
quote:
But so much of it people talk about the Beatles and it was actually George Martin and it was such a small window of time
Let's remember that they had already been together as a band(Paul, George and John) since 1958. Paul had already written Yesterday and I'll Follow The Sun by the time Martin came along. But yes, Martin was the cog in the machine, but they were a cohesive unit.
quote:
McCartney has longevity but Lennon so much crap after the Beatles broke up which is bad
This is spot on. Paul is so much better as a songwriter than John and it's not close. Paul has so much more depth and range in his writing. John's best work was In This Life, that was his magnum opus. Paul had Yesterday, Ill Follow The Sun, Blackbird, Let It Be, Long And Winding Road, O Darling, All My Loving, Hey Jude,and that was just with the Beatles.
quote:
I actually have more respect for George Harrison Post Beatles than any of them
Em. This is debatable. As Cocomo has said numerous times, when George hit, he hit. (Something, Postman, Weeps,My Sweet Lord), but it was few and far between. Paul was the most accomplished, consistent, and successful of the group as a solo artist (Wings included) and that showed in him having the most #1's. If anything , Paul's songwriting is underrated and underappreciated. He's tGOAT in that category. He's the living king of music on top of it all.
This post was edited on 6/28/24 at 10:03 pm
Posted on 6/28/24 at 9:53 pm to OWLFAN86
quote:
OWLFAN86
Good discussion.
Posted on 6/28/24 at 10:02 pm to Wildcat98USA
Clint was the first and only one that I thought of. 
Posted on 6/28/24 at 10:02 pm to Wildcat98USA
Willie Nelson is gonna hurt
Page 7 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News