Started By
Message

re: Multiple fatalities in car wreck at Nicholson and South Quad.

Posted on 2/28/25 at 12:46 pm to
Posted by BR92
Member since Apr 2021
986 posts
Posted on 2/28/25 at 12:46 pm to
quote:

The person who disregarded the red light should be at fault.


The person who disregarded the red light IS at fault.
Posted by FightingTigers138
In your thoughts
Member since Dec 2016
5793 posts
Posted on 2/28/25 at 12:48 pm to
quote:

Car ran red which caused accident


Looks like she had green with a yield on left turns. Example, the car behind her kept going. The light right in the middle of the camera is green. I think the red lights there are for cars merging on the road. That motorcycle was going insanely fast.

ETA: never mind. She had a red arrow. Still, guy must have been going at least 70. How dumb,
This post was edited on 2/28/25 at 12:55 pm
Posted by Howyouluhdat
On Fleek St
Member since Jan 2015
8264 posts
Posted on 2/28/25 at 12:48 pm to
quote:

Wow. Looks like the sedan started to run the light, saw the motorcycle and stopped slightly then thought she could beat it. Moto saw sedan start to stop and then planned to pass on the right. Kind of like a head on where both drivers take the same direction when trying to dodge.



I would say this exactly what happened. Your life can be taken in an instant
Posted by BlackCoffeeKid
Member since Mar 2016
12499 posts
Posted on 2/28/25 at 12:55 pm to
quote:

Looks like she had green with a yield on left turns. Example, the car behind her kept going.

Even if her turn signal was red, I can completely understand how somebody could see the green light (in the lane to continue straight) and miss the red turn signal. It can be pretty easy to zone out at that hour of night with less traffic on the road.
Posted by tigersbb
Member since Oct 2012
11661 posts
Posted on 2/28/25 at 1:03 pm to
quote:


The person who ran the red light would be more at fault than a person travelling through a green light.

She caused the accident by proceeding through the red light and turning in front of him.


You may believe that, but the trier of the case may see it differently. did she begin to turn on green , saw the lights of the motorcycle coming and stopped into the turn, then panicked and tried to proceed through and the collision ensued.. The egregious excessive speed would make it difficult to judge when the motorcycle would reach the intersection and its speed exponentially increased its force vectors. Its like the difference between being hit by my fastball as opposed to Paul Skenes fastball. It will be left to the trier to weigh all factors and evidence plus the opinions of accident reconstructionists if it ever reaches trial stage.
Posted by Red Stick Tigress
Tiger Stadium
Member since Nov 2005
18901 posts
Posted on 2/28/25 at 1:19 pm to
Your picture shows a green light and a car stopped at what I assume is a red light.

The green left turn would have right of way.
Posted by Red Stick Tigress
Tiger Stadium
Member since Nov 2005
18901 posts
Posted on 2/28/25 at 1:25 pm to
quote:

The person who disregarded the red light IS at fault.


I was responding to the person who said the driver of the car would have comparative negligence.
Posted by Red Stick Tigress
Tiger Stadium
Member since Nov 2005
18901 posts
Posted on 2/28/25 at 1:32 pm to
quote:

He was going 75 mph over the speed limit.


Speed of the motorcycle didn't cause the accident. Her running a red light did. The alleged speeding caused fatalities.
Posted by dallastigers
Member since Dec 2003
8013 posts
Posted on 2/28/25 at 1:40 pm to
quote:

They’re building a new south quad hence the renaming of the road.


Thank you
Posted by Townedrunkard
Member since Jan 2019
11884 posts
Posted on 2/28/25 at 1:50 pm to
quote:

I’ve seen the video. He hit it so hard it almost turned the car on its side. Lifted the tires a good 4-5 feet off the ground. A MOTORCYCLE


Yea he turned that motorcycle into a missile.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
281843 posts
Posted on 2/28/25 at 1:52 pm to
quote:



Speed of the motorcycle didn't cause the accident. Her running a red light did.


Yeah it was a huge part of the equation.

Posted by Townedrunkard
Member since Jan 2019
11884 posts
Posted on 2/28/25 at 1:55 pm to
quote:

Then add in whoever owns that road to be partially at fault. That’s way too low a posted speed and probably gave the driver a fse sense of security


You win the award for the most idiotic post of the day.
Posted by TigerGman
Center of the Universe
Member since Sep 2006
12393 posts
Posted on 2/28/25 at 2:36 pm to
quote:

ETA: never mind. She had a red arrow. Still, guy must have been going at least 70. How dumb,


How do you know it was Red? Maybe it was one of those new blinking yellow turn signals.
Posted by VABuckeye
NOVA
Member since Dec 2007
37499 posts
Posted on 2/28/25 at 2:39 pm to
Who fricking cares. They both paid with their lives.
Posted by mikelbr
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2008
48584 posts
Posted on 2/28/25 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

Who fricking cares. They both paid with their lives.


I care. Had one of them been drunk that's all anyone would be talking about b/c they made a bad decision to drink and drive and killed someone.

But running a red light or driving 70 in a 35 mph are also illegal and bad decisions.
Posted by VABuckeye
NOVA
Member since Dec 2007
37499 posts
Posted on 2/28/25 at 2:46 pm to
They are for sure but it's not like some punhsment can be meted out.
Posted by dallastigers
Member since Dec 2003
8013 posts
Posted on 2/28/25 at 2:52 pm to
quote:

I really wish they would just get away with it all together and allow a left turn on red with a stop rather than the confusion of drivers differentiating between a protected and Permitted left turn


Besides lefts from a one way street onto another one way street I think allowing a left turn on red after a stop would cause more confusion.

A red light is the least confusing aspect of the various left turn scenarios. You stop and stay stopped until green arrow or until full green (permitted and yielding left). Protected only left turns likely cause more impatient issues with drivers than misunderstanding the situation.

I was always fine with green arrow for protected lefts, yellow arrow when protected left ending, and then having the full green light for yielding permitted lefts.

But some cities have switched from the full green light for yielding left turns to a flashing yellow arrow. Not sure if anything improved or not with that switch, but there can’t be any confusion between a green arrow and a full green light for those left turns.
This post was edited on 2/28/25 at 3:52 pm
Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
74943 posts
Posted on 2/28/25 at 2:55 pm to
quote:

Speed of the motorcycle didn't cause the accident.


They both broke the law, why is hers somehow worse?
Posted by dallastigers
Member since Dec 2003
8013 posts
Posted on 2/28/25 at 3:02 pm to
quote:

Yea he turned that motorcycle into a missile.


Reminds me of that lady in California hauling arse thru a red light and an intersection causing explosions in car or cars she struck.

The car was a blur in the video taken from the gas station on the corner of the intersection.
Posted by tigermike5
Member since Mar 2006
1281 posts
Posted on 2/28/25 at 3:05 pm to
quote:

They both broke the law, why is hers somehow worse?


Well sadly because her breaking the law got both of them killed. If she doesn’t run a red light she’s still alive and so is the motorcycle rider for the time being.
Jump to page
Page First 7 8 9 10 11 ... 14
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 9 of 14Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram