Started By
Message

re: mRNA Vaccines Can Be Quickly Adjusted to Account for New Variants. Not So Fast My Friend!

Posted on 9/24/21 at 10:53 am to
Posted by Ingeniero
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2013
20379 posts
Posted on 9/24/21 at 10:53 am to
quote:

That's not a "gotcha." What you posted shows that the pharmaceutical scientists are, in fact, updating the vaccine to account for new variants


Almost as if anti-vaxxers simultaneously want extensive testing AND instantaneous rollouts of boosters geared towards new variants. Crazy huh?
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
66138 posts
Posted on 9/24/21 at 10:55 am to
I have been called an antivaxxer 100 times and I support the development and use of Covid vaccines and mRNA tech.

We all side with idiots, including you.

Anyone who thinks being anti mandate is being anti vax, they are a miserable retarded twat.
Posted by LoveThatMoney
Who knows where?
Member since Jan 2008
12281 posts
Posted on 9/24/21 at 10:58 am to
quote:

agree with the vast majority of that, particularly people digging in. And I agree that “ things” are always up for debate. But the point I am making, is there is this pesky little thing called The Constitution that was specifically designed to limit what you broadly refer to as “ debatable “. Some things actually AREN’T debatable if you are governed by The Rule of Law. You actually can’t take away my God-given rights if you have the feels about Covid.


Sure. What godgiven right is being taken away by people’s feels about Covid? The Constitution protects a lot, so I’m curious what is being impinged on in your mind.

And, for whatever this is worth, the Constitution is debated openly almost every single day in Congress or the court system. So even that is debatable
Posted by RobbBobb
Matt Flynn, BCS MVP
Member since Feb 2007
31264 posts
Posted on 9/24/21 at 11:04 am to
quote:

Like I said, they have created them,

You clearly did not. OP said they claimed mRNA could adjust to variants quickly. They lied

Then you asked him, who said they could do that? The link I provided attested to, pretty much everyone said it. Then you just posted
quote:

Like I said, they have created them, they just need to test them.

Which is exactly what the quote in the OP says

Which only confirms that the OP was right when he said they can not adjust on the fly, yet you questioned his assertion, but now claiming you were right, about him being right in the OP
Posted by LSUA 75
Colfax,La.
Member since Jan 2019
4342 posts
Posted on 9/24/21 at 11:06 am to
Hannity had Dr.Robert Malone on his radio show yesterday.He recommends only persons that take the mRNA vaccines are over 65,morbidly obese or other co-morbities.Everyone else get Vit D levels normal and you likely will be ok.
He’s the scientist that was instrumental in developing vaccines from mRNA technology.
He has reservations about the long term safety,
If anyone can’t see the hypocrisy of Congress exempting themselves along with all these immigrants while forcing mandates on citizens,I don’t know what to tell you.
As far as Drs.and nurses refusing the vaccine,there is a reason why.Anyone that’s worked in “healthcare” for any length of time and is a critical thinker understands why.Everything is not as rosy as it appears on the surface and as hospital advertisements would lead one to believe.
I’m not dumping on everything medical.There are some amazing medical facilities around the country-M.D.Anderson,St.Judes,Mayo Clinic,Cleveland Clinic.UAB and Oschners do some fabulous heart surgery.
Run of the mill community hospitals,it’s kind of a crapshoot as to what kind of care you’re going to get.
Posted by waiting4saturday
Covington, LA
Member since Sep 2005
10584 posts
Posted on 9/24/21 at 11:07 am to
So they're treating it like the flu?
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
283257 posts
Posted on 9/24/21 at 11:13 am to
quote:

Anyone who thinks being anti mandate is being anti vax, they are a miserable retarded twat.


Bingo.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
283257 posts
Posted on 9/24/21 at 11:15 am to
quote:

if they don't want to be called an "anti vaxxer", maybe don't repeat every anti vaxxer talking point


I can't help retards who don't understand what they are trying to talk about.

You're blaming the victim for the idiocy of the perpetrator.
Posted by STEVED00
Member since May 2007
22859 posts
Posted on 9/24/21 at 11:15 am to
quote:


Anti-vaxers have a massive victim complex. They get off commiserating together online about how it’s them against the world.



Lol at people who don’t get that this is way more than just about a vaccine any more.
This post was edited on 9/24/21 at 11:16 am
Posted by STEVED00
Member since May 2007
22859 posts
Posted on 9/24/21 at 11:24 am to
quote:


That's not a "gotcha." What you posted shows that the pharmaceutical scientists are, in fact, updating the vaccine to account for new variants.


There were reports it could updated on the fly within weeks. People pushed back saying it would still take time. This article confirms it will take relatively the same amount of time as the original vaccine.
Posted by Cowboyfan89
Member since Sep 2015
12934 posts
Posted on 9/24/21 at 11:25 am to
quote:

Lol at people who don’t get that this is way more than just about a vaccine any more.

They will never get it, because they don't have a problem with what's going on in the world today. They want this.

The irony is people that believe this--
quote:

Anti-vaxers have a massive victim complex. They get off commiserating together online about how it’s them against the world.

--probably complain about unvaccinated people putting them at risk.

But the "anti-vaxxers" have the victim complex.
This post was edited on 9/24/21 at 11:27 am
Posted by STEVED00
Member since May 2007
22859 posts
Posted on 9/24/21 at 11:30 am to
quote:


Almost as if anti-vaxxers simultaneously want extensive testing AND instantaneous rollouts of boosters geared towards new variants. Crazy huh?


You can call it whatever you want. This tech was proclaimed the greatest thing since sliced bread. You know maybe it is but also it was touted as being something that it ended up not being. One that “it could be easily and quickly updated” and two that it would greatly curb the spread of Covid which it obviously has not.

I truly believe there is a very large portion of our population that should absolutely be vaccinated given their age or personal health condition. The points above were some of the main reasons why EVERYONE should take it and that just hasn’t turned out to be true.
Posted by Ingeniero
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2013
20379 posts
Posted on 9/24/21 at 11:44 am to
quote:


You can call it whatever you want. This tech was proclaimed the greatest thing since sliced bread. You know maybe it is but also it was touted as being something that it ended up not being. One that “it could be easily and quickly updated” and two that it would greatly curb the spread of Covid which it obviously has not.


Delta didn't become the dominant strain in the US until July. It's September and we have pharma companies already testing new formulas to deal with variants. Is 2 months an unacceptable length of time?
Posted by Slagathor
Makin' jokes about your teeny tiny
Member since Jul 2007
38754 posts
Posted on 9/24/21 at 11:48 am to
quote:

If anyone can’t see the hypocrisy of Congress exempting themselves


separation of powers did that, not Congress... and how many of them are vaccinated?
Posted by STEVED00
Member since May 2007
22859 posts
Posted on 9/24/21 at 11:48 am to
quote:


Delta didn't become the dominant strain in the US until July. It's September and we have pharma companies already testing new formulas to deal with variants. Is 2 months an unacceptable length of time?




The shot won’t be available until 2022 as per the Moderna person in charge. Relatively same time frame as original
This post was edited on 9/24/21 at 11:50 am
Posted by heatom2
At the plant, baw.
Member since Nov 2010
13016 posts
Posted on 9/24/21 at 11:50 am to
quote:

Delta didn't become the dominant strain in the US until July. It's September and we have pharma companies already testing new formulas to deal with variants. Is 2 months an unacceptable length of time



THESE "VACCINES" ARE EXPERIMENTAL AND NOT PROPERLY TESTED!!!11!!


WHY AREN'T THEY GETTING THESE VACCINES OUT FASTER???
Posted by STEVED00
Member since May 2007
22859 posts
Posted on 9/24/21 at 11:53 am to
quote:


THESE "VACCINES" ARE EXPERIMENTAL AND NOT PROPERLY TESTED!!!11!!


WHY AREN'T THEY GETTING THESE VACCINES OUT FASTER???


JUST TAKE THE VACCINE DAMN IT! WHY DONT YOU JUST TRUST US! HERE IS A BIG MAC, $100, AND SOME DONUTS IF YOU TAKE IT!

WHY TAKE HORSE PASTE OR POOL CLEANER WHEN THE VACCINE IS THE SAVIOR YOU NEED.

This game is fun!
Posted by bbap
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2006
96528 posts
Posted on 9/24/21 at 11:55 am to
i didnt want to start another thread, just wanted to say that louisiana recorded another -51 in hospitals. down to 1,141 now.

Also, the positivity rate continues to fall off a cliff too.

Posted by bbap
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2006
96528 posts
Posted on 9/24/21 at 11:55 am to
The mask mandate is set to expire Thursday, so i imagine we should hear something one way or another early next week.
Posted by Ingeniero
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2013
20379 posts
Posted on 9/24/21 at 11:57 am to
quote:

The shot won’t be available until 2022 as per the Moderna person in charge. Relatively same time frame as original

So is your argument that the government should have less stringent testing on variant doses?
Jump to page
Page First 6 7 8 9 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram