- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Most underrated ancient empire
Posted on 11/23/19 at 10:17 am to Placebeaux
Posted on 11/23/19 at 10:17 am to Placebeaux
Aliens
Posted on 11/23/19 at 10:18 am to BRgetthenet
Patchy delays all the way from Louisa to the base of the high rise
Posted on 11/23/19 at 10:18 am to athenslife101
Assyrians were the original badasses.
The fall of Nineveh would be a superb story if ever put to a movie.
The fall of Nineveh would be a superb story if ever put to a movie.
Posted on 11/23/19 at 10:29 am to athenslife101
quote:No it wasn't.
Sumeria because it was the first.
Posted on 11/23/19 at 10:43 am to athenslife101
I'm partial to the Poon Tang Dynasty. They had to differentiate themselves from the older Tang Dynasty which had something to do with drinks.
Posted on 11/23/19 at 10:44 am to athenslife101
quote:
Rome stull most of their culture
Nebuchadnezzar just turned in his grave.
Posted on 11/23/19 at 10:48 am to Dandy Lion
quote:
Carthage
Carthago delenda est
Posted on 11/23/19 at 11:14 am to Sid in Lakeshore
I think Carthage is properly rated. And they were horrible people. They were doing human child sacrifice much much later than any other Mediterranean civilization and they were ramping up when they were destroyed.
Posted on 11/23/19 at 11:22 am to athenslife101
I’ve recently gotten into reading about the Hellenistic successor states of Alexander. My favorite is the Seleucid Empire.
Posted on 11/23/19 at 11:24 am to athenslife101
Carthaginian War Elephants must have been incredible
LINK
I learned that the war elephants were filthy drunk when they went into battle
LINK
I learned that the war elephants were filthy drunk when they went into battle
Posted on 11/23/19 at 11:25 am to athenslife101
I think the Incas, Aztecs and Mayans could hold their own.
Posted on 11/23/19 at 11:30 am to Upperdecker
quote:
Carthaginian War Elephants must have been incredible
The species of elephant they used are extinct now. But they were smaller than Indian elephants and much Much smaller than typical African elephants
Posted on 11/23/19 at 11:39 am to athenslife101
Babylon
Maurya in India
Kmer
Maurya in India
Kmer
Posted on 11/23/19 at 11:41 am to athenslife101
Mauryan used them
Is ottoman ancient
Is ottoman ancient
Posted on 11/23/19 at 11:44 am to Boo Krewe
it's Sumer, not Sumeria. The people were Sumerians. They are credited with many inventions we still use.
Posted on 11/23/19 at 11:48 am to Boo Krewe
quote:
Mauryan used them
No, they used Indian elephants
quote:
Is ottoman ancient
No. The Ottoman Empire formed 1000 years after the end of the classical/ancient era.
Posted on 11/23/19 at 11:48 am to skeeter531
quote:baseball was first played by the boys of sumer
it's Sumer, not Sumeria. The people were Sumerians. They are credited with many inventions we still use.
Posted on 11/23/19 at 11:53 am to athenslife101
Don't know if this properly qualifies as ancient, since it's right on the cusp of the feudal era, but the Gothic, Frankish, and other Germanic tribes are criminally undervalued by mainstream historians as barbarian savages when in actuality they were far more just and governed far more effectively than their "civilized" Roman equivalents. The kingdoms they built in modern Spain, Italy, France, and Germany were just as impressive militarily as any more prominently remembered ancient empires, and ultimately only disintegrated due to internal division, not the wars of the Moslem or the Roman.
For something more ancient, the Scythians are similarly undervalued. They didn't build a unified empire so much as their people just happened to end up in the ruling castes of many different ancient states. If you see stories about Egyptian mummies with red or blonde hair, or engravings and pottery featuring such light-haired, blue-eyed conquerors, that's them, and the records have them as present in places as far-flung as Egypt, Persia, Mesopotamia, and the Indus Valley, all a long way from their home in modern Ukraine and the steppes north of the Caucasus Mountains.
EDIT: Since it's somewhat topical, I'm also convinced that a city called Atlantis really existed, though it was probably just a coastal town wiped out in a very large flood or storm, not some large empire.
For something more ancient, the Scythians are similarly undervalued. They didn't build a unified empire so much as their people just happened to end up in the ruling castes of many different ancient states. If you see stories about Egyptian mummies with red or blonde hair, or engravings and pottery featuring such light-haired, blue-eyed conquerors, that's them, and the records have them as present in places as far-flung as Egypt, Persia, Mesopotamia, and the Indus Valley, all a long way from their home in modern Ukraine and the steppes north of the Caucasus Mountains.
EDIT: Since it's somewhat topical, I'm also convinced that a city called Atlantis really existed, though it was probably just a coastal town wiped out in a very large flood or storm, not some large empire.
This post was edited on 11/23/19 at 11:55 am
Popular
Back to top


2











