- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Most underrated ancient empire
Posted on 11/23/19 at 11:54 am to JawjaTigah
Posted on 11/23/19 at 11:54 am to JawjaTigah
quote:
I think the Incas, Aztecs and Mayans could hold their own.
50 Spaniards say hold my sangria.
Posted on 11/23/19 at 12:00 pm to athenslife101
quote:
Parthia I think a lot of times doesn’t get the credit they deserve. They were probably Rome’s biggest rivalry.
Credit for what? Existing? Parthia was simply too far away for Rome to effectively reach. Parthia was never a threat to Rome.
Posted on 11/23/19 at 12:06 pm to biglego
Crassus probably thought otherwise
Posted on 11/23/19 at 12:22 pm to Upperdecker
quote:The Romans knew how to fight elephants. That was always more of a historical glorification than anything else.
Carthaginian War Elephants must have been incredible
Two thing elephants hate - fire and really loud noises. They can also be baited into attacking 2 or 3 warriors while ignoring the multitudes that are surrounding, roping and spearing them.
Pyrrhus beat the Romans with elephants - once. No one ever did after that.
Posted on 11/23/19 at 12:25 pm to JawjaTigah
quote:
I think the Incas, Aztecs and Mayans could hold their own.
Until one of their enemies sneezed
Posted on 11/23/19 at 12:28 pm to Carl Tuckerson
quote:
For something more ancient, the Scythians are similarly undervalued. They didn't build a unified empire so much as their people just happened to end up in the ruling castes of many different ancient states.
My pick. They essential told Darius off and Darius was a bad arse.
Posted on 11/23/19 at 12:30 pm to Hogbit
IDK but it wasn't Egyptians
Posted on 11/23/19 at 12:35 pm to Alltheway Tigers!
quote:
and also celebrate the Skill of the Scythians in that Art, who sent once to Darius King of Persia an Embassador that made him a present of a Bird, a Frog, a Mouse, and five Arrows, without speaking one word; and being ask'd what those Presents meant, and if he had Commission to say any thing, answer'd that he had not; Which puzzl'd and gravell'd Darius very much; till Gobrias, one of the seven Captains that had kil'd the Magi explain'd it, saying to Darius, By these Gifts and Offerings the Scythians silently tell you, that unless the Persians like Birds fly up to Heaven, like Mice hide themselves near the Centre of the Earth, or like Frogs dive to the very bottom of Ponds and Lakes, they shall be destroyed by the Power and Arrows of the Scythians.
Just a mic ?? drop moment.
Posted on 11/23/19 at 1:11 pm to Olric
Ottomans were not an ancient empire.
Posted on 11/23/19 at 1:19 pm to Dandy Lion
quote:
Carthage
This.
If Hannibal would've marched on Rome after Cannae, human history would've been vastly different. Before people come back with the "he didn't have the resources to siege Rome" argument, the Roman army was absolutely decimated with only a sparse defense force left for Rome. Their allies were revoking their support left and right. Morale was at an all time low. They wouldn't have needed to siege Rome, the citizens of Rome wouldn't have much fight left.
Posted on 11/23/19 at 1:24 pm to BennyAndTheInkJets
quote:
If Hannibal would've marched on Rome after Cannae
He neither had the seige equipment, the manpower or supply lines to march on Rome.
quote:
with only a sparse defense force left for Rome.
The Servian walls at the time were a huge defense measure for the city of Rome with adequate men to cripple an attack (6,000- 10,000). Hannibal had only some 40-45,000 men to attack that wall.
This post was edited on 11/23/19 at 1:31 pm
Posted on 11/23/19 at 1:26 pm to JawjaTigah
quote:lol no they couldn't. When Western Civilization came it was steel swords verse wood.
think the Incas, Aztecs and Mayans could hold their own.
Posted on 11/23/19 at 1:27 pm to CarRamrod
quote:
Age of Empires.
I miss this game
Posted on 11/23/19 at 1:29 pm to Placebeaux
You seem pretty sure of that. Why?
Posted on 11/23/19 at 1:32 pm to Placebeaux
People don't talk enough about the Mongol empire.
Dan Carlins wrath of Khans is very enlightening to just how insanely impressive they were politically and militarily for some horse farmers from the steppes
Dan Carlins wrath of Khans is very enlightening to just how insanely impressive they were politically and militarily for some horse farmers from the steppes
Popular
Back to top



0










