Started By
Message

re: Meet the gorilla boy's parents!

Posted on 5/31/16 at 10:02 am to
Posted by bwallcubfan
Louisiana
Member since Sep 2007
39172 posts
Posted on 5/31/16 at 10:02 am to
What is the argument for the gorilla supporters? How did they think this was going to end?
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91871 posts
Posted on 5/31/16 at 10:02 am to
quote:

t's sick fricking racists like you that keep this race tension shite going just as much as the BLM retards.




Oh this thread has been full of it. What started in all likelihood as a tragic accident has spiraled into a racially-charged debate between those with sympathy and those without.

Black? Check.

Criminal history? Check.

Overweight? Check.

Kids? Check.

Potential lawsuit? Check.

Throw in an animal being killed AND that animal being a gorilla and this is like fricking Christmas for the sick fricks of the OT.
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
86700 posts
Posted on 5/31/16 at 10:03 am to
quote:

Mother of the year was taking selfies or stuffing her face while lil shithead was climbing two fences. No sympathy for her.


wasn't she handling another child?
Posted by Pectus
Internet
Member since Apr 2010
67302 posts
Posted on 5/31/16 at 10:03 am to
I think we can look at this whole thing objectively if we make the same situation occur in different location with he same sort of interactions between patrons and assets.


I'm talking water parks, amusement parks, aquaria.


What do they do there?


If a kid climbs and gets stuck in the scaffolding of a ride and they shut down the ride and disassemble the ride to get him out, does the park charge the parents for the amount of time the ride is down and for the cost of deconstruction and rebuilding?

Or is the park at fault for allowing that area to be as easily accessible?



Want to hear something a little more closer to home, if you went to Canada and went to these types of attractions you would see far fewer signs of safety and you could go and touch way more things there than in USA...because people assume responsibility for their own safety.

Unlike in USA where there is blame on everyone except you.
This post was edited on 5/31/16 at 10:05 am
Posted by Shexter
Prairieville
Member since Feb 2014
21763 posts
Posted on 5/31/16 at 10:04 am to
More importantly:

IWHI



quote:

Brittany Nicely (left and right) said she tried to stop the child from going into the enclosure but couldn't grab him in time. She then tried to calm the boy's mother has the chaos unfolded


Posted by terd ferguson
Darren Wilson Fan Club President
Member since Aug 2007
114938 posts
Posted on 5/31/16 at 10:06 am to
Wait a sec... there are people really standing around holding signs and crying over a fricking gorilla?

Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
55374 posts
Posted on 5/31/16 at 10:06 am to
quote:


how would you do it?

explain in detail please
call the kid over and drop a basket at the end of a rope... pretty sure gorillas can't understand our language

then ban mama and dad and the kids from all zoos for life
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
86700 posts
Posted on 5/31/16 at 10:07 am to
quote:

call the kid over and drop a basket at the end of a rope... pretty sure gorillas can't understand our language



uh....
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 5/31/16 at 10:07 am to
quote:

WTF does that have to do with a 4 year old kid being in grave danger from an ape?



Ummm, everything. The kid wouldn't have been there in the first place if he had parents worth half a shite.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91871 posts
Posted on 5/31/16 at 10:07 am to
It is entirely plausible that both parties are at fault and that is that. The parent's should have paid more attention and the zoo shouldn't have such accessibility available to 4 year olds. The kid only had minor injuries and the gorilla was killed. Given the events that led up to it, that is the best case scenario for the zoo and the parents and each should go on about their business IMO.

However, for those that think the zoo is absolved from any culpability because the parents may have been negligent, you're wrong, at least from a legal standpoint.
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
70176 posts
Posted on 5/31/16 at 10:07 am to
quote:

there are people really standing around holding signs and crying over a fricking gorilla?


well one is an endangered species while the other is a dangerous species
Posted by Moustache
GEAUX TIGERS
Member since May 2008
21657 posts
Posted on 5/31/16 at 10:08 am to
quote:

Wait a sec... there are people really standing around holding signs and crying over a fricking gorilla?



Just like the "life-long" fans of Cecil the lion.
Posted by Moustache
GEAUX TIGERS
Member since May 2008
21657 posts
Posted on 5/31/16 at 10:09 am to
quote:

all the kid over and drop a basket at the end of a rope... pretty sure gorillas can't understand our language

then ban mama and dad and the kids from all zoos for life



Right. Because surely the gorilla wouldn't grab the child. The gorilla surely wouldn't flip out when the child tried to run.
Posted by Malik Agar
Member since Nov 2012
12076 posts
Posted on 5/31/16 at 10:10 am to
You sound like someone who's trying to justify his own shitty parenting and mistakes.
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
55374 posts
Posted on 5/31/16 at 10:12 am to
quote:

the zoo shouldn't have such accessibility available to 4 year olds.
how many other kids have gotten in?

Posted by Moustache
GEAUX TIGERS
Member since May 2008
21657 posts
Posted on 5/31/16 at 10:12 am to
quote:

It is entirely plausible that both parties are at fault and that is that. The parent's should have paid more attention and the zoo shouldn't have such accessibility available to 4 year olds.


I tend to lean that it's a freak accident. At the Houston zoo, if you're determined enough you can find yourself in an exhibit. This zoo went 38 yrs without incident.

I fault the parents WAY more than I fault the zoo. But also, the zoo perhaps should have had more staff or better protection around that exhibit. still, for a 4 year old to be able to climb 2 barriers the parents were definitely distracted for more than a split second. I dont' know the situation, so I will withhold judgment, but I'd definitely be interested in seeing security footage of where their attentions were as the kid climbed down.
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
86700 posts
Posted on 5/31/16 at 10:13 am to
quote:

how many other kids have gotten in?


relevance?
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91871 posts
Posted on 5/31/16 at 10:13 am to
quote:

Boo fricking hoo. Mother of the year was taking selfies or stuffing her face while lil shithead was climbing two fences. No sympathy for her.






Eyewitness reports seem to debunk this BS completely.
Posted by uptownsage
New Orleans
Member since Oct 2014
2156 posts
Posted on 5/31/16 at 10:13 am to
quote:

In what respect was she a bad parent? Should you have your kids on a leash everywhere you go?





Actually yes. This is the exact problem in New Orleans. Parents are not held responsible for their children's actions. Parents should pay attention to what their little shits are doing. If you aren't responsible enough to monitor them and make sure they aren't climbing over barriers to get inside a animal enclosure, you shouldn't have kids and should be sterilized.
Posted by Pectus
Internet
Member since Apr 2010
67302 posts
Posted on 5/31/16 at 10:14 am to
quote:


uh....




Good thing the basket and rope are things I carry at all times. It's so handy.
This post was edited on 5/31/16 at 10:15 am
Jump to page
Page First 3 4 5 6 7 ... 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram