- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Mayor SWB Claims To Have Discovered City Contract With Silky Slim Through Records Request
Posted on 7/28/17 at 8:25 am to TigerstuckinMS
Posted on 7/28/17 at 8:25 am to TigerstuckinMS
quote:
You serious, Clark? What happens when people move out of the parish over the next three and a half years because of what that shitstain is doing? Which people do you think will be moving? HINT: It won't be the people who voted for that worthless piece of shite in the mayor's office.
Not only that, but the worst elements among them breed like rabbits on the taxpayer dime. And they get a vote
Posted on 7/28/17 at 8:39 am to doubleb
quote:
This brought up a few questions?
Who issued the contract?
Who else gets these kind of deals?
Why $9800.00? Is it just below 10K to avoid review?
I think people need to keep digging to see who is tapping into the city treasury and who is letting them do it.
Yes indeed
quote:
"It was recently brought to my attention that he was engaged by a member of my staff to serve in contractual relationship as a 'street counselor' for the BRAVE program. That contract was cancelled and no monies were dispersed," the statement read in part.
Mayor President Crawfish, the leader of this city.
Posted on 7/28/17 at 8:40 am to Golfer
quote:
A terrible, rural candidate was within 4,000 votes in a parish with over 200,000 registered. All is not lost.
True
Also consider what is at stake here with SG. A viable ISD in the Southern part of the parish could eventually stop white flight, and young families who now leave for neighboring parishes might stay home. That would allow for more growth, more voters and yes a better chance at winning a parish wide election.
Keep in mind too that the city population hasn't hardly grown at all. That is another factor at play.
I don't think many at city hall want to see a boom in the SE part of the parish because they can't keep control. That and the private schools who oppose SG as well as the families who have kids in an EBR Magnet school. All these folks are against an ISD for obvious reasons.
Meanwhile the overall school attendance in the parish has dropped. By overall I mean both public and private schools. That means fewer young couples and families are staying home.
Posted on 7/28/17 at 8:42 am to TigersSEC2010
quote:
We're told the contract was signed at the end of June for Reed to talk to troubled teens in hopes of reducing crime, but the contract for $9,800 did not require the mayor's signature.
Does Mr Silk have a criminal record? If so, it is beneficial to have someone who has attempted to recover their life after incarceration talk to troubled teens.
HOWEVER, $9,800.00 is unnecessary and a waste. Cover travel expenses and provide lunch/dinner and maybe $250.00 for time.
It is suspect that the "contract" was just under $10k, avoiding certain IRS reporting. And it is further suspect a contract of that amount was unsigned by the mayor.
ETA: it seems this mayor has multiple weekly questionable events pop up in the news. It is only a matter of time before the hammer falls. She appears to be wreckless and doing a poor job covering her tracks. Hugh Freeze did a better job.
This post was edited on 7/28/17 at 8:44 am
Posted on 7/28/17 at 8:44 am to SamuelClemens
quote:
It is suspect that the "contract" was just under $10k,
Perhaps if under 10K it doesn't have to go before the Council for approval?
Posted on 7/28/17 at 8:48 am to doubleb
Posted on 7/28/17 at 8:49 am to lsufan1971
Silky Slim has integrated himself into the mainstream of the local Democrat Party.
Wow, tight with our Mayor and our Governor. No wonder he became cocky and ran his mouth.
I wonder how many consulting contracts he gets a year?
Wow, tight with our Mayor and our Governor. No wonder he became cocky and ran his mouth.
I wonder how many consulting contracts he gets a year?
Posted on 7/28/17 at 8:52 am to LSU-MNCBABY
quote:
Not our problem anymore if we can get st George
What many of you are missing is Broome is mayor-president of the entire parish, and that includes all the municipalities like Zachary, Baker and Central and not just the city of BR.
If SG became a city, we would still have Broome as the mayor-president and we'd still have her in control of a lot of our tax dollars either directly or indirectly.
Posted on 7/28/17 at 8:58 am to doubleb
I think one of two things is bound to happen in the next 2-3 years before the 2020 election:
- Broome continues on this path of ineptitude and frustrates the entire constituency. Opening up the door for a moderate candidate to run and win. Similar to Sandy Stimpson winning in Mobile in 2013 over the black candidate despite a similar racial and electorate makeup to EBR.
- St. George movement happens and energizies South BR to maintain, if not increase, the middle class base in the parish.
- Broome continues on this path of ineptitude and frustrates the entire constituency. Opening up the door for a moderate candidate to run and win. Similar to Sandy Stimpson winning in Mobile in 2013 over the black candidate despite a similar racial and electorate makeup to EBR.
- St. George movement happens and energizies South BR to maintain, if not increase, the middle class base in the parish.
Posted on 7/28/17 at 8:59 am to doubleb
she's mayor pres of BR and unincorporated EBR
Posted on 7/28/17 at 9:00 am to cgrand
No. She's mayor of BR and president of the parish.
Posted on 7/28/17 at 9:05 am to Golfer
quote:
$17,500 and up require Council approval
That clears that up.
Perhaps federal rules are involved, or maybe SS didn't get the max for other reasons.
Posted on 7/28/17 at 9:06 am to TigersSEC2010
This bish is going to be recalled.
Posted on 7/28/17 at 9:07 am to cgrand
quote:
she's mayor pres of BR and unincorporated EBR
Wrong, citizens of Central and Zachary, etc. vote for mayor-president too. They also vote on city-parish council members.
Broome is a parish official.
Posted on 7/28/17 at 9:08 am to doubleb
they also have a mayor though
she's not the mayor of central/etc...to them she's the parish president
she's not the mayor of central/etc...to them she's the parish president
Posted on 7/28/17 at 9:10 am to SamuelClemens
quote:
It is suspect that the "contract" was just under $10k, avoiding certain IRS reporting
It has nothing to do with the IRS. It would be under $10k because Louisiana probably has a law for small businesses that contracts under a certain amount can simply be awarded and don't have to go through a bidding process.
This post was edited on 7/28/17 at 9:11 am
Posted on 7/28/17 at 9:14 am to cgrand
quote:
they also have a mayor though she's not the mayor of central/etc...to them she's the parish president
But the mayor-president, parish president, or whatever you call what we have, has a big role in how tax dollars are spent in their areas. She has more power than their mayor does. Way more power.
Posted on 7/28/17 at 9:17 am to Golfer
quote:
Broome continues on this path of ineptitude and frustrates the entire constituency.
There's a large segment of her constituency that will never be frustrated by anything that woman dies.
Posted on 7/28/17 at 9:57 am to TigersSEC2010
Dear SWB,
Please quit before you make Deedy Slaughter seem competent.
Signed,
Tax Paying BR
Please quit before you make Deedy Slaughter seem competent.
Signed,
Tax Paying BR
Posted on 7/28/17 at 10:09 am to TaderSalad
Sharon always seems to have that "deer in the headlights" look whenever she's asked questions that she hasn't rehearsed an answer for. You can tell she's been coached on her rehearsed rants.
Popular
Back to top



0




