- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 5/21/20 at 10:04 pm to The Pirate King
quote:
The Pirate King
WE WUZ WHITE TRASH KANGZ N shite BEFORE DAT GODDAMNED OLE PO TAY TO FAMYUN
Posted on 5/21/20 at 10:05 pm to Disgeaux Bob
quote:
No one has corrected me
The McMichaels did not witness Arbery in the house on the day of the incident. That is a known fact.
Posted on 5/21/20 at 10:06 pm to Disgeaux Bob
quote:
just giving consideration to the facts before me.
Ok, cool.
So if Georgia law requires a felony to be knowingly committed and witnessed in order to give chase when a person runs from the scene, what felony did Arbery commit?
Posted on 5/21/20 at 10:06 pm to Disgeaux Bob
quote:
Disgeaux Bob
You won’t win, man.
The mob show is angry!
Posted on 5/21/20 at 10:07 pm to AlonsoWDC
quote:
WHITE TRASH KANGZ
Still don’t kill at a 10:1 clip than them real KANGZ!
Posted on 5/21/20 at 10:07 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
But it’s plausible the McMichaels only a few houses away were either called or saw something or heard it from another neighbor.
So you dont understand what "direct knowledge of" means?
Posted on 5/21/20 at 10:08 pm to FAP SAM
quote:
So you dont understand what "direct knowledge of" means?
I understand that they could have had reasonable suspicion that a felony occurred.
I know that...
Posted on 5/21/20 at 10:08 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
You won’t win, man.
When the facts and the law are against you, losing is the typical outcome. Sorry.
Posted on 5/21/20 at 10:09 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
I understand that they could have had reasonable suspicion that a felony occurred.
That’s not direct knowledge.
Posted on 5/21/20 at 10:09 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
Never said this for the McMichaels. But this stupid charge this thread is based off of doesn’t stand a chance.
Maybe I should have said “arguing that they should get off.” I mean:
quote:
What is the legal distance to raise your weapon when someone is running right at you?
quote:
I’ve only claimed the men had a right to defend themselves if the kid tried to take their guns.
quote:
Which ones? The ones simply arguing we may not have all the evidence? That AA did, in fact, go for a man’s weapon? That he does have a defense because of that?
Yep, definitely not defending them.
quote:
This entire case is about race.
Weird, I thought it was about two non-cops taking the law into their own hands, killing an unarmed man, and the good ole baw network / DA running interference until one of the idiots leaked the video to the media.
Amazing how your perspective can change when you aren’t obsessed with race.
Posted on 5/21/20 at 10:10 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:So again, you dont understand what "direct knowledge of" means
could have had reasonable suspicion
Posted on 5/21/20 at 10:12 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
Errerrerrwere
I think a black dude must have fricked your ole lady
Posted on 5/21/20 at 10:14 pm to lostinbr
quote:
Yep, definitely not defending them.
Defending them or the right to have a jury trial?
You hack!
quote:
Weird, I thought it was about two non-cops taking the law into their own hands, killing an unarmed man, and the good ole baw network / DA running interference until one of the idiots leaked the video to the media.
It is! Nothing’s changed. Just don’t forget to add the race porn that you masturbate to daily. You know. The whole hunted down by a posse while the angel was just out jogging.
quote:
Amazing how your perspective can change when you aren’t obsessed with race.
Don’t pass that off on me. That’s been my whole spiel through this. How the media wants to make it seem like the USA Today is merely the USA pre Civil War, you lunatic!
:rotflmao.
Keep trying to twist it up in as many knots as you can. You’re about to hurt yourself!
This post was edited on 5/21/20 at 10:14 pm
Posted on 5/21/20 at 10:15 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
Errerrerrwere
Posted on 5/21/20 at 10:15 pm to Iron Lion
quote:
I think a black dude must have fricked your ole lady
Nah. I must have fricked Arbery’s mom.
Posted on 5/21/20 at 10:17 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
northshorebamaman
Here comes the dumb dumb that couldn’t make it in the real world!
Posted on 5/21/20 at 10:17 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
quote:
...or ya know people dont think its reasonable To chase someone down and draw weapons on someone for a misdemeanor crime that wasn’t even witnessed by the vigilantes.
We know one side of the story at this point. But I agree no one wants that.
Lol we know the side of the story from the alleged murderers themselves, and it paints a pretty convincing picture of felony murder.
quote:
The point is mcmichaels crew didnt have any direct knowledge of a felony. Again, we don’t know everything. But it’s plausible the McMichaels only a few houses away were either called or saw something or heard it from another neighbor. Officer Trash even texted English about the neighbors knowing and getting together on it. So, the day it happened, maybe they were just ready.
We know what the alleged murderers claim. And I heard it from a friend who heard it from a friend isnt direct knowledge of an ongoing felony. A misdemeanor trespassing isnt a felony, a retired law officer Like mcmichaels should be well aware of this. Seems like highly questionable cause for a citizens arrest best case scenario for mcmichaels.
quote:
That is a fact, according to mcmichaels own statements. Police reports can be misleading as well.
If your position is that police reports are unreliable Evidence in court, I think thats inconsistent with the vast majority of court cases. Maybe that happened in this case, but i think thats a moon shot.
quote:
If everything comes out the way you claim; yes, trash will be a great description.
if everything comes out the way the alleged murderers claimed. Trash is 100% applicable.
You point to statistics, as if there were 0% chance that this could have possibly been a racially inspired case is asinine. Not saying this one was race based, but arguing black on white being more common than white on black doesnt mean there is no white on black crime.
Posted on 5/21/20 at 10:18 pm to AMS
quote:
alleged murderers
Well, at least you got that one right.
Posted on 5/21/20 at 10:20 pm to AMS
quote:
Not saying this one was race based, but arguing black on white being more common than white on black doesnt mean there is no white on black crime.
Sure there is. I’ve never said there wasn’t. I even posted the actual data.
The only thing I’ve claimed is that from the numbers it looks to be one sided. And those numbers would prove who is really being hunted.
Would you like a hint at who is really doing the overall hunting in this country?
Violent crime committed on BOTH races?
ETA to add since y’all love numbers so much
This post was edited on 5/21/20 at 10:24 pm
Page 17 of 22
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News