- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Man thrown in jail for 37 days over Charlie Kirk post on Facebook wins $835,000 settlement
Posted on 5/20/26 at 7:10 pm to NC_Tigah
Posted on 5/20/26 at 7:10 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
He said what he is accused of saying. The state proceeded legally.
Everyone who has two brain cells to rub together knows that he was not threatening the school
quote:
He ELECTIVELY spent 37 days behind bars because he chose to not make bail. The settlement is YOUR money, your taxpayer money. Pay him what bail would have cost. Period.
This is just absurd.
Be mad at the people wielding lawfare poorly because they got their feelings hurt. Don’t be mad at the guy who was falsely accused and was rightfully paid for his unjust incarceration.
Posted on 5/20/26 at 7:12 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
He said what he is accused of saying. The state proceeded legally. He ELECTIVELY spent 37 days behind bars because he chose to not make bail. The settlement is YOUR money, your taxpayer money. Pay him what bail would have cost. Period.
This isn’t North Korea, you old piece of shite. I’m glad your social security money went to his settlement, I hope he buys a fancy new car with it.
Posted on 5/20/26 at 7:13 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
He ELECTIVELY spent 37 days behind bars because he chose to not make bail. The settlement is YOUR money, your taxpayer money. Pay him what bail would have cost. Period.
Well, that shows how little you know about what went on. Under your formula, the government owes him another $1,165,000.
There is a whole discussion about punitive damages to be had here as well.
Posted on 5/20/26 at 7:18 pm to NIH
quote:
Should’ve got a life sentence
Do you not like the USA? People are going to say shite that you don't agree with, but it should never end up in a jail sentence because.. You will say some shite people don't agree with.
Posted on 5/20/26 at 7:20 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
quote:No nitwit.
that's absolutely retarded.
I don't do "retarded".
There was a reason bond was set at that level. Why?
Regardless, if the POS couldn't make it, he could have done a GoFundMe, Community support, etc to help raise the money.
If not, $200K for 37 days is far more than enough to compensate him in response to charges for being a jackass.
Posted on 5/20/26 at 7:22 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
No nitwit. I don't do "retarded".

Posted on 5/20/26 at 7:22 pm to Obtuse1
quote:He was going to skip bail?
Well, that shows how little you know about what went on. Under your formula, the government owes him another $1,165,000.
REALLY?
Well, that shows how little you know ...
Posted on 5/20/26 at 7:29 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
He said what he is accused of saying. The state proceeded legally.
They used a very loose interpretation of the law in order to put him in jail because their feelings got hurt over a damn meme.
quote:
He ELECTIVELY spent 37 days behind bars because he chose to not make bail. The settlement is YOUR money, your taxpayer money. Pay him what bail would have cost. Period.
Would you like mustard or ketchup on that boot?
Posted on 5/20/26 at 7:35 pm to OweO
NIH is being facetious.
NC on the other hand is a weather vane when it comes to being ideologically consistent, depending on who the aggrieved is.
NC on the other hand is a weather vane when it comes to being ideologically consistent, depending on who the aggrieved is.
Posted on 5/20/26 at 7:39 pm to NC_Tigah
=
quote:lawfare
There was a reason bond was set at that level. Why?
quote:what?
Regardless, if the POS couldn't make it, he could have done a GoFundMe, Community support, etc to help raise the money.
quote:just lol
If not, $200K for 37 days is far more than enough to compensate him in response to charges for being a jackass.
Posted on 5/20/26 at 7:42 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
He was going to skip bail?
REALLY?
Well, that shows how little you know ...
quote:
Pay him what bail would have cost.
Bail was $2 million. It would have cost him $2 million to post bail for himself. You said he elected to stay in jail.
Next, you are going to try the 2 15 14 4 approach.
Posted on 5/20/26 at 7:43 pm to BluegrassBelle
quote:It's happened many many times before. Was their ""loose"" interpretation illegal? Again, the settlement will be paid from public funds, meaning taxpayers bear the cost for 7-10yrs income for this POS.
They used a very loose interpretation of the law in order to put him in jail because their feelings got hurt over a damn meme.
Posted on 5/20/26 at 7:46 pm to Obtuse1
quote:NO!
It would have cost him $2 million to post bail for himself.
If he had $2M, bail would have cost him whatever he could have earned in ROI while the state held the money. That's it. As long as he didn't skip town, the $2M would be returned to him, guilty or innocent. If he didn't have $2M, the bond would cost 10% ... or $200K nonrefundable.
This post was edited on 5/20/26 at 7:49 pm
Posted on 5/20/26 at 7:48 pm to NC_Tigah
Why is this guy a POS again?
Posted on 5/20/26 at 7:51 pm to CocomoLSU
quote:
A fricking felony?? What grounds were they charging him with a felony on? That is insanity and an egregious overstep. That some totalitarian UK type bullshite.
Totally agree…that bullshite ruined that man’s life…
Posted on 5/20/26 at 7:51 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
NO!
Yes, to post bail for himself he would have had to have $2 million, either liquid or in real property the jurisdiction accepted.
I predicted you would go the bond route in my post.
Bond would have cost $200k to $300k for a surety company to post bail. You didn't say what the bond would cost; you said what the bail would cost him.
Posted on 5/20/26 at 7:51 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
It's happened many many times before. Was their ""loose"" interpretation illegal? Again, the settlement will be paid from public funds, meaning taxpayers bear the cost for 7-10yrs income for this POS.
Then maybe they shouldn’t hold residents on soft charges because their feelings got hurt with an absurd bond amount.
I don’t blame this guy for taking advantage. I blame the tryhards who tried to get cute and it cost taxpayers. Maybe they should lose their jobs over it.
Posted on 5/20/26 at 7:52 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
quote:Perhaps he was born that way. Perhaps he was raised badly. Perhaps he is a mean drunk. Why do you think he is a POS?
Why is this guy a POS again?
Posted on 5/20/26 at 7:57 pm to Obtuse1
quote:I just did. What exactly do you think the $200K represented?
You didn't say what the bond would cost; you said what the bail would cost him.
Your "$1,165,000" post was ridiculous. You do realize that?
Posted on 5/20/26 at 8:02 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
I just did. What exactly do you think the $200K represented?
You did not say that before my response, and I predicted in my post that bond would be your next shot. I wrote it out in a simple cypher. You are arguing from the back of a poor argument, which makes you predictable. I can tell you where you will go next if you continue, if you like.
You were unaware of the bail amount or mixed the use of bail and bond up, one of those is true.
Popular
Back to top



0








