- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Madison Brooks Rape Trial- Its been over 2 years
Posted on 3/28/25 at 3:14 pm to ATrillionaire
Posted on 3/28/25 at 3:14 pm to ATrillionaire
quote:
I wouldn't based on fear for my own safety. If that wasn't a concern, I'd 100% drop anchor.
Sigh
If you tell your neighbor you'll take his dog out to Cat Springs to leave with Uncle Cody, and it's being obstreperous on the way, and you can't find his uncle's place . . . coyotes gotta eat too I guess.
0
Posted on 3/28/25 at 3:17 pm to HeadCall
quote:
Nah, but that’s not what happened so…
Humor us, tell us what happened then.
Posted on 3/28/25 at 3:23 pm to AlwysATgr
They tried to drive her to wherever she wanted to go but she couldn’t tell them where so the eventually let her out in the parking lot of an apartment that she chose from it seems.
Then she walked out in the road like an idiot and got run over
Then she walked out in the road like an idiot and got run over
Posted on 3/28/25 at 3:29 pm to HeadCall
quote:
They tried to drive her to wherever she wanted to go
that was very thoughtful of the rapers.
Posted on 3/28/25 at 3:30 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
that was very thoughtful of the rapers.
We have the best rapers
Posted on 4/12/25 at 12:32 pm to AlwysATgr
quote:
There was a poster, "JudgeHolden," who posted extensively in the first thread on this case. I think he was a lawyer, not a judge. He hasn't posted since 3/9/23. Just wondering whatever happened to him.
Ban hammer. He dared an admin to ban him. The admin obliged.
Posted on 4/12/25 at 3:06 pm to RanchoLaPuerto
Check out my friend, Lamont at Large's take on this case. He does a great job.
Posted on 4/12/25 at 3:10 pm to HeadCall
quote:
They tried to drive her to wherever she wanted to go but she couldn’t tell them where so the eventually let her out in the parking lot of an apartment that she chose from it seems.
Then she walked out in the road like an idiot and got run over
Yeah, after being so obviously drunk, she allowed them to violently anal rape her and video the whole thing.
Posted on 4/12/25 at 3:24 pm to AlwysATgr
quote:
Humor us, tell us what happened then.
Him and the jizzle guy seem to have serious repressed sexual issues.
Posted on 4/12/25 at 3:32 pm to RanchoLaPuerto
quote:
Ban hammer. He dared an admin to ban him. The admin obliged.
Well poop. Sorry to hear that. In the original thread on this he was helpful to in explaining the legal angles available to the defense. It was interesting.
Posted on 4/12/25 at 5:15 pm to JodyPlauche
Love Lamont - he puts out some great content.
I hadn’t seen that snippet of MB running across the road to the 4 guys. She was pretty quick on her feet for being so hammered
I hadn’t seen that snippet of MB running across the road to the 4 guys. She was pretty quick on her feet for being so hammered
Posted on 4/12/25 at 5:29 pm to AlwysATgr
quote:
And if someone demands out in the middle of Katy Freeway at 6PM do you just drop anchor and say here you go?
I would absolutely let them out as soon as I could do it safely. Not letting them out is false imprisonment or unlawful restraint.
Posted on 4/13/25 at 12:20 am to JodyPlauche
quote:
JodyPlauche
Thanks for the Lamont at Large. I agree with his point of view. He apparently has access to some details that I had not heard reported previously, e.g., playing loud music during the act so no one could hear her scream.
One point of correction:. It appears to be water along the curb in the imagery when MB is running toward their car but I don't think it was raining when she was struck. That was reported by a British newspaper but I don't think that was accurate. However, it was cold (near freezing).
Weather Underground: BTR 1/15/23
This post was edited on 4/13/25 at 12:28 am
Posted on 4/13/25 at 12:25 am to TigerGman
IWHI
Posted on 4/13/25 at 12:31 am to JodyPlauche
Only a minute in and he’s erroneously referring to Fred’s as previously being Reggie’s. This is categorically wrong. How can I believe anything else he has to say if he’s wrong on this simple point?
Posted on 4/13/25 at 12:36 am to Obtuse1
quote:
I would absolutely let them out as soon as I could do it safely. Not letting them out is false imprisonment or unlawful restraint.
Correct. And no one is gonna accuse you of "false imprisonment or unlawful restraint" because you elected to exit onto the service road and find a safe place. Nor would anyone accuse them of such had they taken an obviously inebriated MB to a safe place.
As I noted above, people don't even treat their friend's dog like she was treated.
This post was edited on 4/13/25 at 2:17 am
Posted on 4/13/25 at 12:51 am to JodyPlauche
Watched the whole video. Going to her grave site was very grim. This guy clearly is just after likes and follows. Very little credibility as far as I’m concerned.
Posted on 4/13/25 at 12:54 am to Chipand2Putts
The beginning was weird, how he introduced the apartments in Tigerland. Yes, that are is a dump, but he said something like this is where the guys probably lived? Weren't they all from Denham or Walker? Not sure what the what about.
Posted on 4/13/25 at 1:25 am to dragginass
quote:
So maybe she was raped 2 days in a row. I have no idea, and neither do you. She was too drunk to consent, and the other men could have stopped it. I'm not sure why some of y'all are trying to defend the shitbags. A crime was committed. We just don't know to what exactly charge level.
Oh wow lol
Posted on 4/13/25 at 2:36 pm to Cosmo
quote:
Her having sex the night before seems very relevant
It might still come in.
The court of appeal left it open:
quote:
admissibility of the expert opinion that injuries to M. B. may be suspicious for sexual assault" and thus whether the origin of the injuries may implicate La. Code Evid. art. 412( A)( 2)( a).
The 412 reference is the rape shield law. The specific reference is to an exception in the shield:
quote:
Evidence of past sexual behavior with persons other than the accused, upon the issue of whether or not the accused was the source of semen or injury; provided that such evidence is limited to a period not to exceed seventy-two hours prior to the time of the offense, and further provided that the jury be instructed at the time and in its final charge regarding the limited purpose for which the evidence is admitted
If the prosecution argues that the injuries negate any consent, or that no cognizant person would consent to sex that caused the injuries, the defense can (I think) put on evidence that the injuries occurred before.
(Sorry for the long post, and the indelicacy, but . . .)
That could really hurt the defense from a persuasion standpoint. If she had prior injuries from the day before, the sex that night would have been extremely painful, which undercuts any consent argument.
This all points up why we should all pray that this pleads out. I cannot imagine a parent having to sit through this trial.
Take my take FWIW.
This post was edited on 4/13/25 at 3:40 pm
Page 34 of 35
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News