- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
3
Posted on 11/5/25 at 1:33 am to Old Sarge
Posted on 11/5/25 at 6:49 am to FrontlineTiger
quote:
her dad is the biggest failure.
Because of her sexual preferences and history?
I hate to break the news to you, most women are into most things.... Especiaoly if asked at the right time.
In this situation, the girl was blackout drunk. It wouldn't matter if they screwed her on a cloud and laid her in a feather bed after...still rape.
Having drunk sex is fun, having relatively sober sex with someone who is bordering on alcohol poisoning isn't fun... It's fricking rape.
Posted on 11/5/25 at 7:42 am to jlovel7
quote:
deemed this girl deserved what happened to her because of her taste in men.
You don't have to think she "deserved" anything while at the same time acknowledge that her actions raise some serious doubt about the arrestees' criminal culpability. It's not a one thing/other scenario. Our criminal justice system is built on the "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard - and rightly so. There are lots of cases where subjects actions may offend the public's sensibilities. That doesn't necessarily make them criminally guilty.
Posted on 11/5/25 at 7:52 am to LSUGrrrl
That YouTube video is the definition of sensationalism media.
Holy propaganda Batman!
Holy propaganda Batman!
This post was edited on 11/5/25 at 7:53 am
Posted on 11/5/25 at 8:01 am to FrontlineTiger
I have the feeling these dudes are gonna get off. The lines are too blurred and too much doubt will be cast.
Posted on 11/5/25 at 8:02 am to magildachunks
quote:
That YouTube video is the definition of sensationalism media.
Just the title alone screams sensationalism.
Posted on 11/5/25 at 9:05 am to moontigr
The white dude thought he was gonna get off by choosing a bench trial but the judge just got thrown off the case.
Posted on 11/5/25 at 9:30 am to moontigr
quote:
I have the feeling these dudes are gonna get off. The lines are too blurred and too much doubt will be cast.
Not if she was my daughter.
Posted on 11/5/25 at 9:31 am to whoa
Good.
Does this mean she’s completely removed from the proceedings, or just Carver’s judge only trial?
Does this mean she’s completely removed from the proceedings, or just Carver’s judge only trial?
Posted on 11/5/25 at 9:48 am to Mag Orange Bastard
I think just Carver’s case? Not sure if the others chose bench or jury trial.
Posted on 11/5/25 at 10:07 am to FrontlineTiger
quote:
but her dad is the biggest failure.
That’s a fricking awful thing to say. I’ve heard she came from a nice family. Kids act a fool despite good parenting all the time.
Posted on 11/5/25 at 10:13 am to Havoc
quote:
Kids act a fool
Enjoying sex, even rough sex with her friend the day before, isn't "acting a fool"
It's normal.
The only real bad decision by her was drinking entirely too much.
And realistically, we've all done that.
Posted on 11/5/25 at 11:43 am to whoa
From the story
In a February 2023 text to his father, Carver wrote: “And the judge we are getting, I think u know about but we are friends with her and she is really good for our case. Her son was accused of rape a while back so she knows to help us.”
Nelson Dan Taylor Jr., Ray’s 46-year-old son, was convicted of two counts apiece of forcible rape and aggravated burglary in 1997. Ray was one of his trial attorneys, according to court records.
In December 2023, Carver sent his father another text message just before Ray was expected to make a pivotal pre-trial ruling. He suggested his defense attorney, Joe Long, told him the outcome would be in their favor.
“Because you know I was stressed about today but he still says we are good and judge is on our side,” the text stated.
After the hearing was postponed, Carver texted someone that “everything is good” and Ray reset the hearing for the following week.
“She had a problem opening all the discovery for the phones. But Joe said she is going to rule in our favor,” Carver’s text said.
the perp’s lawyer has indicated they’ll appeal the refusal…here’s my question: “why?” If there’s no bias from ray why should it matter who the judge is in the bench trial?
In a February 2023 text to his father, Carver wrote: “And the judge we are getting, I think u know about but we are friends with her and she is really good for our case. Her son was accused of rape a while back so she knows to help us.”
Nelson Dan Taylor Jr., Ray’s 46-year-old son, was convicted of two counts apiece of forcible rape and aggravated burglary in 1997. Ray was one of his trial attorneys, according to court records.
In December 2023, Carver sent his father another text message just before Ray was expected to make a pivotal pre-trial ruling. He suggested his defense attorney, Joe Long, told him the outcome would be in their favor.
“Because you know I was stressed about today but he still says we are good and judge is on our side,” the text stated.
After the hearing was postponed, Carver texted someone that “everything is good” and Ray reset the hearing for the following week.
“She had a problem opening all the discovery for the phones. But Joe said she is going to rule in our favor,” Carver’s text said.
the perp’s lawyer has indicated they’ll appeal the refusal…here’s my question: “why?” If there’s no bias from ray why should it matter who the judge is in the bench trial?
Posted on 11/10/25 at 3:27 pm to cgrand
judge recused
quote:
A new judge has been assigned to preside over the December trial of Casen Carver.
Earlier this week, District Court Judge Brad Myers recused Judge Gail Horne Ray from presiding over the trial after the family of Madison Brooks expressed concerns about Ray’s impartiality.
quote:
It was announced in court on Thursday, Nov. 6, that the case has been given to Fred Crifasi, pending the appeal’s results.
The case has been put on hold until the result of Ray’s appeal to the First Circuit. The appeal is due by Dec. 5, unless an extension is granted.
Carver’s lawyer told WAFB he intends to appeal the decision that removed Judge Ray from the case.
A trial date will reportedly be set after Jan. 7, when the appeal’s status is reviewed.
Any trial, whether with Ray or Crifasi, will be a bench trial.
Posted on 11/10/25 at 3:37 pm to JDPndahizzy
Interesting. I wonder if he will change his plea given the change in judge.
Page 5 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News