- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Louisiana officially canceling Mid-Barataria Diversion, state's biggest coastal project
Posted on 7/17/25 at 6:00 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Posted on 7/17/25 at 6:00 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Just get some heavy equipment down there and breach the levee at night when no-one can see. That'll divert water and sediment.
Posted on 7/17/25 at 6:08 pm to Boston911
quote:
fortunately I was able to see the presentation a couple years ago at the Port of fusion, when you see it on a map in comparison to the total area around it, it is relatively small,,, and it would take 50 years to achieve
25 sq mi is more are than has been built by the Wax Lake delta; which is an incredible feat of Mother Nature.
To bad your ignorance is shared with the idiots making decisions
Posted on 7/17/25 at 6:10 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
They must have made it past the "make you family rich with studies and contracts" portion to the portion where results are expected.
Posted on 7/17/25 at 6:12 pm to choupiquesushi
quote:
One day the gulf will be at Belle chase, Lafitte and Larose
And spending $3 billion dollars on this boondoggle would not have changed that fact.
Posted on 7/17/25 at 6:47 pm to hawkster
You can tell the drastic difference of each side of the Mississippi down there. The nutrients alone from this would have invigorated plant life down there. The east side is green with the fresh water, the west side is dying.
Lafitte and the Baratarian Basin will continue to suffer for another 15 years of environmental studies for future diversions.
Lafitte and the Baratarian Basin will continue to suffer for another 15 years of environmental studies for future diversions.
Posted on 7/17/25 at 6:57 pm to Boston911
quote:Thats a sizeable chunk of land gain. Now instead of gaining that land plus replenishing sediment for existing land, we’ll continue to lose even more land.
would only create 25 mi.² of land in one small area
Its a much bigger net difference that 25 sq miles when you factor in that land that’ll continue eroding away.
Posted on 7/17/25 at 7:50 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:
At the end of the day, it's just something that we just could not afford, no way, shape or form," Alford said.
IT WAS FEDERALLY FUNDED
Posted on 7/17/25 at 7:56 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Yeah well Landry forgets there are something called laws.
This diversion project just doesn’t simply go away. Votes have to be cast. Legislation has to be changed.
Big ol nothingburger from Napoleon Landry.
Again.
This diversion project just doesn’t simply go away. Votes have to be cast. Legislation has to be changed.
Big ol nothingburger from Napoleon Landry.
Again.
Posted on 7/17/25 at 8:52 pm to Boston911
You couldn’t be more wrong.
Posted on 7/17/25 at 9:07 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
I drive HWY 23 often. There is almost nothing between Jesuit Bend and Port Sulphur. Anything that is there is either elevated, or in the case of the new LNG plant, has its own flood protection. Remove all those river and back levees.
This money would be better spent elevating HWY 23 over that stretch, and removing those river levees. Let the Mississippi flood the entire Barataria basin every year.
Spend whatever leftover money there is building up lower JP levees (such as Marrero & Lafitte) for times of historically high river levels.
This money would be better spent elevating HWY 23 over that stretch, and removing those river levees. Let the Mississippi flood the entire Barataria basin every year.
Spend whatever leftover money there is building up lower JP levees (such as Marrero & Lafitte) for times of historically high river levels.
Posted on 7/17/25 at 9:27 pm to TSmith
quote:
This money would be better spent elevating HWY 23 over that stretch, and removing those river levees. Let the Mississippi flood the entire Barataria basin every year.
Sounds great, but the oyster and shrimp farmers don't give a shite about our state. They just want the shrimping area and oyster beds to stay exactly where they are and will make sure to lobby against any attempt to rebuild our coast
Posted on 7/17/25 at 9:38 pm to One72
quote:
This diversion project just doesn’t simply go away. Votes have to be cast. Legislation has to be changed
Unfortunately, that's exactly what is happening. And Landry has the power to do it.
Posted on 7/17/25 at 9:41 pm to TigerintheNO
quote:
5 years from now will be interesting to see how much FEMA is charging for flood insurance in those two parishes
Hopefully Plaquemines and St. Bernard will be made to pick up the tab for the rest of Louisiana’s flood insurance. They deserve it.
Corrupt, stupid politicians make me sick, and this shite hole state is full of them.
Posted on 7/17/25 at 9:52 pm to KamaCausey_LSU
No sitting governor has the power to change 200 years of governance to reflect current legislation, with one fell swoop of his dirty pen.
Get real.
Landry ain’t God, yall.
There are rules.
This ain’t Vietnam.
.
Get real.
Landry ain’t God, yall.
There are rules.
This ain’t Vietnam.
.
Posted on 7/17/25 at 10:00 pm to One72
quote:
No sitting governor has the power to change 200 years of governance to reflect current legislation, with one fell swoop of his dirty pen.
I'm no fan of him, but he has authority over CPRA and through it, the State Coastal Master plan. All my they had to do was leave it out of the FY budget.
Per the CPRA press release I saw, they're going forward with the Myrtle Grove dredging project as a replacement.
Eta: I'm just glad he can't dismantle CPRA without legislative action and a constitutional amendment.
This post was edited on 7/17/25 at 10:10 pm
Posted on 7/17/25 at 10:22 pm to KamaCausey_LSU
quote:
Cancelling the MBSD means $600m down the drain with nothing to show for it.
It will end up being over $1B once you factor in unpaid contract obligations.
Posted on 7/18/25 at 9:09 am to Bmath
Saw an interview on TV a while back with a scientist and supporter of the diversion. The scientist said people against the diversion were scared that their way of life will change. The scientist said they were absolutely right, the diversion WILL CHANGE how the live, but their way of life IS CHANGING ANYWAY, and the diversion provides some hope of a sustainable future on the land and water, otherwise the change that will happen is nothing will be left for anyone.
Posted on 7/18/25 at 9:16 am to Tiger Prawn
quote:
Thats a sizeable chunk of land gain. Now instead of gaining that land plus replenishing sediment for existing land, we’ll continue to lose even more land.
Its a much bigger net difference that 25 sq miles when you factor in that land that’ll continue eroding away.
Oysters are good, who gives a shite
Me and my family will dip if the day ever comes, I got people in Metairie
This post was edited on 7/18/25 at 9:23 am
Posted on 7/18/25 at 9:28 am to chalmetteowl
quote:
Oysters are good, who gives a shite
And in 20 years when the bulk of the industry has converted to off-bottom oyster farming, these areas will sit idle.
The real reason why this has been cancelled has nothing to do with the social and environmental impacts or legal issues. It's because the current state leaders have friends, families, and donors who stand to benefit financially from "dredge baby, dredge".
Guarantee that someone at the top stands to financially benefit from this.
quote:
The Medium Diversion at Myrtle Grove with Dedicated Dredging feasibility study (MDMG) is a Mississippi River diversion with dedicated dredging ecosystem restoration project identified in the LCA program. It was authorized under the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 - Section 7006(c)(1)(E) and Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority of Louisiana is the cost-share partner in the development and implementation of this project.
This post was edited on 7/18/25 at 9:38 am
Posted on 7/18/25 at 9:31 am to chalmetteowl
quote:
Me and my family will dip if the day ever comes, I got people in Metairie
You own land, have any equity? You are willing to walk away with empty-handed, because this is what will happen. Are you hoping the state or federal government will swope in to give you a buy-out?
Popular
Back to top



0





