- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Louisiana chemical plant threatens to shut down if EPA emissions deadline isn’t relaxed
Posted on 5/30/24 at 11:49 am to ragincajun03
Posted on 5/30/24 at 11:49 am to ragincajun03
quote:
The company has been at the center of a broader fight over environmental rules and racism
Posted on 5/30/24 at 11:52 am to indytiger
quote:
How on earth did they spin this into a race issue
Environmental Racism, the new hot topic with Anti-Industry groups. All the laws and rules industry has to follow only protects White People in their minds.
Posted on 5/30/24 at 12:08 pm to ragincajun03
The OT is a bit two faced on this issue. On one hand, Bogalusa's main problem, before it became a crime infested shithole with a Marxist for a mayor, was the papermill. Now it's both. Considering Bogalusa's proximity to St Tammany, how much better off would Bogalusa have been if they told the mill kick rocks 25 years ago and billed itself as a cheap residential community? 25 years ago people were still fixing up the old houses in town and raising a family there. Now it's just rent houses and section 8.
Posted on 5/30/24 at 12:24 pm to LegendInMyMind
quote:
It doesn't matter, though, because the city attempted to shift all the blame to the plants, or at least the few that were still in operation (you likely know their names). The city claimed it had no idea such as that was thrown into that dump for decades. And today, the litigation still rolls on.
I have a feeling this type of frickery is only going to increase. And of course, the local media in such towns/cities will never tell the full story with the necessary historical facts.
Posted on 5/30/24 at 12:27 pm to sta4ever
quote:
She and they won’t be saying that in a few years, whenever Reserve turns into an even bigger shithole than it already is.
She won’t care about the lost jobs. She and her family is likely being paid by the funders of these NGOs causing all this mess.
Posted on 5/30/24 at 12:27 pm to Gee Grenouille
quote:
The OT is a bit two faced on this issue. On one hand, Bogalusa's main problem, before it became a crime infested shithole with a Marxist for a mayor, was the papermill. Now it's both. Considering Bogalusa's proximity to St Tammany, how much better off would Bogalusa have been if they told the mill kick rocks 25 years ago and billed itself as a cheap residential community? 25 years ago people were still fixing up the old houses in town and raising a family there. Now it's just rent houses and section 8.
Bogalusa would still be a shithole, just a shithole with a smaller population.
The city owes its entire existence to industry. It was founded by a lumber company and built around a sawmill. Those people “fixing up old houses” 25 years ago were doing so because they either worked at the paper mill or had jobs elsewhere in the local economy which was propped up by.. the paper mill.
The fact that it’s kind of close to St. Tammany doesn’t mean it would be Mandeville if not for the paper mill.
Posted on 5/30/24 at 12:29 pm to ragincajun03
quote:
She won’t care about the lost jobs. She and her family is likely being paid by the funders of these NGOs causing all this mess.
These people are no different than the ambulance chasers. They destroy places and industries for a quick buck and leave the rest of the public to pay for their greed.
That being said, these companies absolutely have a responsibility to clean up after themselves but we have to find rational ways to balance the two.
Posted on 5/30/24 at 12:32 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
That being said, these companies absolutely have a responsibility to clean up after themselves but we have to find rational ways to balance the two.
Completely agree.
Posted on 5/30/24 at 12:43 pm to ragincajun03
That's all part of it. Put them out of business and render several unemployed.
Then they'll be at the mercy of the gubmint.
Then they'll be at the mercy of the gubmint.
Posted on 5/30/24 at 12:53 pm to LSUDUCKMAN67
This plant use to be the DuPont Neoprene plant. DuPont also makes Kevlar on that site. DuPont sold the Neoprene plant to Denka because Neoprene has a low profit margin compared to making Kevlar for the MIC. My theory is that Denka bought the Neoprene business with a long term lease and DuPont can't get Denka off of the property. Remember DuPont was the original polluter and Denka has reduced the emissions by 80% of what DuPont was emitting. But that isn't enough for the EPA who is helping DuPont get out of the long-term lease by shutting down the Neoprene plant for environmental issues. Once the plant is shut down DuPont will have more land available to build more capacity for Kevlar production. One other note, if this plane shuts down there will not be another polychlorprene (Neoprene) plant in the Americas (north, central and south). You can expect any product that uses polychlorprene to skyrocket and in time of war the US will be SOL.
Posted on 5/30/24 at 2:33 pm to Born to be a Tiger1
Really respect the thought put into this theory
The reality is—If Denka shuts down, DuPont will 100% go down with the ship as well. Not sure the media and community realize this. The loss of jobs would be double what they think it would be.
The reality is—If Denka shuts down, DuPont will 100% go down with the ship as well. Not sure the media and community realize this. The loss of jobs would be double what they think it would be.
Posted on 5/30/24 at 2:52 pm to Dicky
quote:
The reality is—If Denka shuts down, DuPont will 100% go down with the ship as well. Not sure the media and community realize this. The loss of jobs would be double what they think it would be.
Is that because of feedstock coming from Denka or something?
Posted on 5/30/24 at 2:52 pm to sta4ever
quote:
She and they won’t be saying that in a few years, whenever Reserve turns into an even bigger shithole than it already is.
It’s not like the plants have translated into much population growth for the area, so shouldn’t be a huge deal for this one to leave.
Posted on 5/30/24 at 3:22 pm to Tempratt
quote:
That's all part of it. Put them out of business and render several unemployed. Then they'll be at the mercy of the gubmint.
Approximately 0 percent of the locals work at the plant. Anyone working at the plant is paid enough to not live that close.
The local neighbors have been on the government tit for generations. Dirt poor with nowhere to go.
Give the plant the two years to upgrade.
Posted on 5/30/24 at 3:54 pm to LSUDUCKMAN67
LOL. They don't want jobs. Just want to complain, and wait on that check.
Posted on 5/30/24 at 4:51 pm to ragincajun03
Damn an operator I work with just left to go there. About to send this to him 
Posted on 5/30/24 at 6:16 pm to lostinbr
It’s mostly because of shared utilities at the site between the two companies. Nitrogen, natural gas, steam, river water…
DuPont provides most of this because the equipment was meant to run at that efficiency anyways. Denka foots the bill for their usage.
DuPont provides most of this because the equipment was meant to run at that efficiency anyways. Denka foots the bill for their usage.
Posted on 5/30/24 at 6:38 pm to F1y0n7h3W4LL
quote:
Ms. Livigne
I bet her income won't be effected by a shutdown
Posted on 5/30/24 at 6:46 pm to ragincajun03
don't worry, they can make the same stuff in china without any environmental regulations at 1/2 the price and we can import it
those 250 people don't need those jobs
those 250 people don't need those jobs
Posted on 5/30/24 at 6:57 pm to lostinbr
quote:
That doesn’t absolve Denka (or any of the other manufacturers) of their responsibility to be good stewards of the environment, of course. I have no idea whether the EPA deadline is reasonable in this case, but there has been scrutiny over emissions at that Denka site for years now. At first glance 90 days looks absurd but I think there’s probably more to the story.
I thought this was more they will be shutdown in the years to come so their response would be, let’s shutdown now then. See the heads spin and backtrack, well you can’t do it tomorrow.
Popular
Back to top


0







