- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Looks like the LSU girl who did the GIRLSDOPORN video MIGHT be getting paid after all....
Posted on 1/3/20 at 9:04 am to MMauler
Posted on 1/3/20 at 9:04 am to MMauler
Some of them were told that the videos were for private sale, in foreign countries and would never be used on the internet
Then he had women that worked for him lie to the girls as well. We all know the reality of this transaction for these girls but this guy is a real piece of shite.
Then he had women that worked for him lie to the girls as well. We all know the reality of this transaction for these girls but this guy is a real piece of shite.
1
Posted on 1/3/20 at 9:04 am to MMauler
I wondered what they got paid. There's so much content out there. Seems a prostitution loophole would be just to say you were filming a porn.
Posted on 1/3/20 at 9:04 am to supatigah
quote:
The guy lies to the girls, had women that he paid to lie to the girls and is wanted on a child porn and sex trafficking charge. These GDP girls were naive but they were also lied to and manipulated.
They knew they were being paid to screw strangers on film. Period. They were naive to not assume where the video was to be shown.
He could be a son of a bitch and it does mean these girls' stupidity should put money in their pocket.
This post was edited on 1/3/20 at 9:06 am
Posted on 1/3/20 at 9:05 am to MMauler
If someone wanted to find these videos? Asking for a friend who has searched the regular sites...so he says anyway.
Posted on 1/3/20 at 9:05 am to MMauler
quote:
making sex videos without knowing the footage would be posted on the internet,
Exactly how stupid are these women?
Posted on 1/3/20 at 9:06 am to supatigah
quote:
These GDP girls were naive but they were also lied to and manipulated.
So, they didn't agree to f*ck a stranger ON FILM?
And, they weren't paid the $1,500 to f*ck a stranger ON FILM?
And, they didn't do this VOLUNTARILY for the $1,500?
But, you apparently feel sorry for them because they were too f*cking stupid to believe a PORN PRODUCER who orally told them that it wouldn't show up on the internet.
Posted on 1/3/20 at 9:06 am to MMauler
Some of the girls, like Ms Teen Colorado did multiple videos too.
Posted on 1/3/20 at 9:06 am to Napoleon
quote:I’ve always wondered this also. Couldn’t I pay any number of girls to do all kinds of stuff as long as I’m “filming art”?
Seems a prostitution loophole would be just to say you were filming a porn.
Posted on 1/3/20 at 9:07 am to MMauler
By the way. $1500?
Sheesh. That's cheap arse in California
Sheesh. That's cheap arse in California
Posted on 1/3/20 at 9:07 am to BigPerm30
quote:
Let’s also remember that it’s a $13 million JUDGEMENT.
Fine. 7.8 million.
Posted on 1/3/20 at 9:08 am to MMauler
quote:
So, they didn't agree to f*ck a stranger ON FILM?
quote:
And, they weren't paid the $1,500 to f*ck a stranger ON FILM?
quote:
And, they didn't do this VOLUNTARILY for the $1,500?
all of this, I can't believe dudes on here are knighting for these bimbos, but again, I feel like most of our OT studs are teenagers still living with their parents
Posted on 1/3/20 at 9:08 am to ShortyRob
quote:
Exactly how stupid are these women?
If they let a boyfriend film them having sex and assumed there was not a possibility of it ever ending up on the internet they would be stupid.
If you take $1500 from a stranger to screw another stranger on video and assume it will not ever be on the internet a judge should declare you mentally incompetent to handle your own affairs.
These girls "got off" on being bad girls and now do not want to live with the consequences.
This post was edited on 1/3/20 at 9:10 am
Posted on 1/3/20 at 9:09 am to MMauler
quote:Pretty sure oral contracts aren’t any good after about 500 dollars. It it’s a lawsuit, of course a jury will side with the poor innocent girls.
who orally told them that it wouldn't show up on the internet.
Posted on 1/3/20 at 9:09 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
How dumb do you have to be to get filmed fricking and not expect this?
I love it when chick's fall for....just the tip.
Posted on 1/3/20 at 9:11 am to VolsOut4Harambe
quote:
Yeah I was gonna say, weren’t there 2 of them?
One lived on the LSU campus and took classes at BRCC. She had really big boobs and counts as an LSU student through LSU/BRCC bridge program and she got railed.
There are pics of her in her McVoy dorm room. She officially counts as an LSU student
This post was edited on 1/3/20 at 9:38 am
Posted on 1/3/20 at 9:14 am to MMauler
quote:
The judge also granted the women’s request for ownership rights to their images that appeared on videos produced by the defendants and were posted on several adult websites. In addition, the judge ordered the defendants to take down the women’s sex videos.
Worse part of the story.
Posted on 1/3/20 at 9:14 am to alajones
It wasnt oral contracts. They sign a multipage contract with small print. It is shown in videos.
Not that I have seen any of them of course
Not that I have seen any of them of course
This post was edited on 1/3/20 at 9:15 am
Posted on 1/3/20 at 9:15 am to MMauler
quote:
But, you apparently feel sorry for them because they were too f*cking stupid to believe a PORN PRODUCER who orally told them that it wouldn't show up on the internet.
So the director took advantage of them using false pretenses and "economic coercion" so to speak by way of saying they would have to pay back expenses if they bailed on the shoot?
Seems like a sound reason for the producer(s) who lied, paid other people to lie and profited off their lies at these girls expenses to pay some money.
Sorry you don't get to watch naive college girls, who don't want to be in internet porn, get boned on camera anymore.
Posted on 1/3/20 at 9:15 am to Saintsisit
quote:
quote:
The judge also granted the women’s request for ownership rights to their images that appeared on videos produced by the defendants and were posted on several adult websites. In addition, the judge ordered the defendants to take down the women’s sex videos.
Worse part of the story.
They are all inundated over the free sites at this point, the internet is forever
Posted on 1/3/20 at 9:16 am to MMauler
Some of you idiots should learn to read
I have not given an opinion, I said what happened and posted links to what happened to warrant the judgement
I think these girls were naive and stupid
We all know the reality of this transaction, doesn’t make it any less fraudulent for a jury
I would love to see the contract the girls signed, I am guessing that the fraud goes deeper than just screen shots of text messages. One of the stipulations of the judgement is the women get copies of the contract they sign.
Also keep in mind that 22 girls is a fraction of the women that have appeared on that site, so these 22 are the exceptions, not the norm. Most of the women that did the videos knew what they were doing. I seem to remember the 22 were from the early days of GDP when they were getting started.
I have not given an opinion, I said what happened and posted links to what happened to warrant the judgement
I think these girls were naive and stupid
We all know the reality of this transaction, doesn’t make it any less fraudulent for a jury
I would love to see the contract the girls signed, I am guessing that the fraud goes deeper than just screen shots of text messages. One of the stipulations of the judgement is the women get copies of the contract they sign.
Also keep in mind that 22 girls is a fraction of the women that have appeared on that site, so these 22 are the exceptions, not the norm. Most of the women that did the videos knew what they were doing. I seem to remember the 22 were from the early days of GDP when they were getting started.
Page 3 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News