- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Livingston teacher and LPSO husband booked on Rape/Child Porn
Posted on 10/24/19 at 12:24 pm to LSUTigerFan247
Posted on 10/24/19 at 12:24 pm to LSUTigerFan247
So has it been confirmed if the victim(s) are students or adopted children?
Posted on 10/24/19 at 12:38 pm to TigeRoots
quote:
So has it been confirmed if the victim(s) are students or adopted children?
I was told by someone very close to the case that the adopted children were all involved in various very disturbing encounters on film. shite I can’t even type because it makes me sick. I was also told he is on video, jacking off onto cupcakes, and then she brought them for the kids to eat. She filmed the kids eating them for him to watch later and enjoy.
Posted on 10/24/19 at 12:40 pm to toosleaux
quote:
. I was also told he is on video, jacking off onto cupcakes, and then she brought them for the kids to eat. She filmed the kids eating them for him to watch later and enjoy.
How can that someone be so warped and no one knows? How does someone like that not raise red flags? I just can’t even imagine how someone could be so fricked up
Posted on 10/24/19 at 12:40 pm to toosleaux
If the cupcake part is true, shouldn’t there be other charges that would indicate that?
Posted on 10/24/19 at 12:42 pm to Gringo44
quote:
If the cupcake part is true, shouldn’t there be other charges that would indicate that?
Yes. Parents are being contacted today and charges will be added.
Posted on 10/24/19 at 12:43 pm to LSUTigerFan247
quote:
He just figured his "family member", Jason Ard, would sweep it under the rug when the time came.
Makes you wonder if AG's office knew Jason Ard is crooked and there was a strong possibility he would run interference for his guy.
Did they really not give LPSO a heads up they were investigating LPSO's own SWAT commander?
From the articles I've seen, it looks like Ard was blindsided by all this.
Posted on 10/24/19 at 12:44 pm to toosleaux
quote:
Yes. Parents are being contacted today and charges will be added.
Well my daughter was a student of hers. As far as I know, we've not been contacted concerning anything just yet. Like I said before, I pray to God this is just a wild rumor at this point.
Posted on 10/24/19 at 12:46 pm to jdd48
quote:
Well my daughter was a student of hers. As far as I know, we've not been contacted concerning anything just yet. Like I said before, I pray to God this is just a wild rumor at this point.
Have you asked your daughter if she has ever eaten any treats brought to school by Mrs. Perkins? Seems pretty easy to find out, for your own sanity.
Posted on 10/24/19 at 12:46 pm to jdd48
quote:
Well my daughter was a student of hers
Jesus Christ id be losing my mind right now
Posted on 10/24/19 at 12:46 pm to toosleaux
quote:
I was also told he is on video, jacking off onto cupcakes, and then she brought them for the kids to eat. She filmed the kids eating them for him to watch later and enjoy.
quote:
Yes. Parents are being contacted today and charges will be added.
Prayers sent to jdd48. He's already disclosed in this very thread that his daughter had this sick bitch of a woman as her english teacher.
Anything less than a life sentence for this fricked up couple is inappropriate.
Posted on 10/24/19 at 12:49 pm to toosleaux
quote:
Parents are being contacted today and charges will be added.
well Livingston School Board just got some civil liability
Posted on 10/24/19 at 12:50 pm to Sentrius
The obscenity charge could be the cupcakes, no?
This post was edited on 10/24/19 at 12:50 pm
Posted on 10/24/19 at 12:51 pm to dirtytigers
quote:
the couple set up cameras all over there house and had all of their "interactions" with the adopted kids filmed. Stuff you don't want to hear, like an 8 year old boy sucking the man off
That might be the most fricked up thing I've ever read on the OT. Those poor children, violated in the worst way by the two people in the world who should be looking out for them the most.
Posted on 10/24/19 at 12:51 pm to toosleaux
quote:
Have you asked your daughter if she has ever eaten any treats brought to school by Mrs. Perkins? Seems pretty easy to find out, for your own sanity.
Not just yet. These latest rumors only surfaced a couple hours ago. I don't know how to even approach it at this point. As I mentioned, we've already had her asking us what rape means. If we have to begin to dance around the subject of tainted cupcakes...
This post was edited on 10/24/19 at 12:53 pm
Posted on 10/24/19 at 12:51 pm to TigeRoots
quote:
The obscenity charge could be the cupcakes, no?
SFP, post the statute for obscenity and lets see if it applies to Jizz cupcakes please.
Posted on 10/24/19 at 12:52 pm to Sentrius
i think there is a specific statute that covers something like that. maybe sexual battery. brb
Posted on 10/24/19 at 12:55 pm to SlowFlowPro
Obscenity
that's likely their watching of the CP
quote:
A. The crime of obscenity is the intentional:
(1) Exposure of the genitals, pubic hair, anus, vulva, or female breast nipples in any public place or place open to the public view, or in any prison or jail, with the intent of arousing sexual desire or which appeals to prurient interest or is patently offensive.
(2)(a) Participation or engagement in, or management, operation, production, presentation, performance, promotion, exhibition, advertisement, sponsorship, electronic communication, or display of, hard core sexual conduct when the trier of fact determines that the average person applying contemporary community standards would find that the conduct, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest; and the hard core sexual conduct, as specifically defined herein, is presented in a patently offensive way; and the conduct taken as a whole lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.
(b) Hard core sexual conduct is the public portrayal, for its own sake, and for ensuing commercial gain of:
(i) Ultimate sexual acts, normal or perverted, actual, simulated, or animated, whether between human beings, animals, or an animal and a human being; or
(ii) Masturbation, excretory functions or lewd exhibition, actual, simulated, or animated, of the genitals, pubic hair, anus, vulva, or female breast nipples; or
(iii) Sadomasochistic abuse, meaning actual, simulated or animated, flagellation, or torture by or upon a person who is nude or clad in undergarments or in a costume that reveals the pubic hair, anus, vulva, genitals, or female breast nipples, or in the condition of being fettered, bound, or otherwise physically restrained, on the part of one so clothed; or
(iv) Actual, simulated, or animated touching, caressing, or fondling of, or other similar physical contact with a pubic area, anus, female breast nipple, covered or exposed, whether alone or between humans, animals, or a human and an animal, of the same or opposite sex, in an act of apparent sexual stimulation or gratification; or
(v) Actual, simulated, or animated stimulation of a human genital organ by any device whether or not the device is designed, manufactured, or marketed for such purpose.
(3)(a) Sale, allocation, consignment, distribution, dissemination, advertisement, exhibition, electronic communication, or display of obscene material, or the preparation, manufacture, publication, electronic communication, or printing of obscene material for sale, allocation, consignment, distribution, advertisement, exhibition, electronic communication, or display.
(b) Obscene material is any tangible work or thing which the trier of fact determines that the average person applying contemporary community standards would find, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest, and which depicts or describes in a patently offensive way, hard core sexual conduct specifically defined in Paragraph (2) of this Subsection, and the work or thing taken as a whole lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.
that's likely their watching of the CP
Posted on 10/24/19 at 12:55 pm to toosleaux
quote:
Yes. Parents are being contacted today and charges will be added.
don't take this the wrong way
I hope you are 1000% sure this is the truth before coming into these threads and saying things like this. If you are hearing this from others I would just stop. If you are sure, I'm still not sure you should be sharing those details
Posted on 10/24/19 at 12:57 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
well Livingston School Board just got some civil liability
Maybe I’m dense, but how is the school board liable for something they didn’t know about?
Posted on 10/24/19 at 12:58 pm to Ed Osteen
She has a lot of unflattering comments to remove from her FB when she bonds out
Popular
Back to top


1







