Started By
Message

re: Let’s discuss colonizing Mars. Why?

Posted on 7/22/24 at 10:49 am to
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
23022 posts
Posted on 7/22/24 at 10:49 am to
quote:

Why are we equating “colonizing” with exploration and research? Even if there is a long term manned station there it’s not colonization.


And the moon is the stepping stone, not Mars. It’s why the big project to put a refueling space station in lunar orbit is called “Gateway”


Our moon is our best testing and proving ground for long term space exploration and research. It's a much better commute than Mars.

quote:

How do we terraform Venus?


https://phys.org/news/2014-07-terraform-venus.html
This post was edited on 7/24/24 at 4:42 pm
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
21408 posts
Posted on 7/22/24 at 11:13 am to
I am guessing Columbus heard arguments similar to this too.
Posted by AwgustaDawg
CSRA
Member since Jan 2023
11184 posts
Posted on 7/22/24 at 12:11 pm to
quote:


1) humans would have to be supported at all times by an artificial bubble in order to survive

2) all needs would have to be met artificially - food and water

3) psychologically how would it be healthy for a human to never be able to go outside nor breathe natural air?


4) As a launching point to other planets this too seems like a falsehood. No proof of any other planets that could support life have been discovered.

So aside from being cool to say humans went there, what’s the point in estalblishing a colony on an inhabitable planet ?


If it is anything like space exploration to this point getting there is about 1/1000 of the reason...the main reason is the amount of innovative technology that is developed to do such things. NASA has been one of the largest driving economic engines ever known to man. The crap we have today that are a result of that spending makes the dollar amount spent seem miniscule. Such programs average close to a 4/1 return on investment.
Posted by AwgustaDawg
CSRA
Member since Jan 2023
11184 posts
Posted on 7/22/24 at 12:12 pm to
quote:


Why explore Antarctica? Why explore the Mariana Trench? Why climb Everest or K2? The human spirit baw.


This is the other side of the equation. Its what man has always done when he had the resources and technology.
Posted by Tempratt
Member since Oct 2013
14518 posts
Posted on 7/22/24 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

Biden is brain dead.
\

If he had just been honest about the kind of woman he wanted, he would've had a better time.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
8222 posts
Posted on 7/22/24 at 12:53 pm to
quote:

So aside from being cool to say humans...


That's the only purpose of the entire space program.

There's no practical benefit whatsoever.

People can blab about the space program producing Tang and velcro and this that and the other technological innovation, but there's no reason we couldn't have invented them to fill the needs that they actually fulfill instead of inventing them to send people to the moon or Mars or some shite.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
123604 posts
Posted on 7/22/24 at 12:56 pm to
The technological advances that would be achieved just to TRY and make this feasible would advance society by an almost incalculable degree.

It would eventually change every aspect of your life.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
123604 posts
Posted on 7/22/24 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

There's no practical benefit whatsoever.



Wrong
Posted by IlikeyouBetty
Bossier City, LA
Member since Nov 2010
1513 posts
Posted on 7/22/24 at 1:01 pm to
I take it you have never seen a little movie called Total Recall?
Posted by diat150
Louisiana
Member since Jun 2005
45996 posts
Posted on 7/22/24 at 1:16 pm to
Mankind will have to branch out into space if he plans on surviving long term. our rate of consumption of resources will catch up with us and we wont be able to maintain our current standard of living.
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
40977 posts
Posted on 7/22/24 at 1:17 pm to
quote:

2) all needs would have to be met artificially - food and water

That is incorrect.

Posted by Lutcher Lad
South of the Mason-Dixon Line
Member since Sep 2009
6673 posts
Posted on 7/22/24 at 3:01 pm to
I think it would be a great place to populate with Democrats! Their out-of-this world ideas and pollcies would fit well.
Posted by VolSquatch
First Coast
Member since Sep 2023
5165 posts
Posted on 7/22/24 at 3:32 pm to
quote:

2) all needs would have to be met artificially - food and water



Not really

quote:

3) psychologically how would it be healthy for a human to never be able to go outside nor breathe natural air?



maybe the going outside thing

quote:

4) As a launching point to other planets this too seems like a falsehood. No proof of any other planets that could support life have been discovered.



We don't have to live on those planets for us to want to go to them. Could be for mining or whatever else.
Posted by gumbo2176
Member since May 2018
17895 posts
Posted on 7/22/24 at 3:56 pm to
I'd be willing to bet dollars to donuts that we won't be significantly closer to colonizing Mars in the next 100 years than we are now.

The distance and logistics to construct and sustain a colony are astronomical to overcome.
This post was edited on 7/22/24 at 4:21 pm
Posted by TigerintheNO
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2004
42742 posts
Posted on 7/22/24 at 4:23 pm to
quote:

potentially habitable planets


my guess is that before we find an habitable planet we find a moon that's habitable
Posted by jeffsdad
Member since Mar 2007
23352 posts
Posted on 7/22/24 at 4:45 pm to
Be a lot easier building domes and underground facilities on the moon rather than Mars. Still near impossible though.
Posted by dblwall
Member since Jul 2017
496 posts
Posted on 7/22/24 at 4:49 pm to


Posted by SteelerBravesDawg
Member since Sep 2020
43337 posts
Posted on 7/22/24 at 5:01 pm to
quote:

global warming

Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
23022 posts
Posted on 7/22/24 at 5:43 pm to
quote:

Be a lot easier building domes and underground facilities on the moon rather than Mars. Still near impossible though.


It looks to me like it is entirely doable for the moon at least for a serious research station. Our moon is a satellite with vast sums of resources already in orbit. Tunneling to avoid radiation, growing food, mining are all there in a great proving ground.

3D printing as manufacturing will be more than handy.
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
23022 posts
Posted on 7/22/24 at 5:44 pm to
Serving Man.

first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram