Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

LED overstated the impact of the Motion Picture Tax Credit

Posted on 12/3/18 at 4:04 pm
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
43038 posts
Posted on 12/3/18 at 4:04 pm
per the latest report from the state auditor.

Does anyone care anymore?

They obviously cooked the books to make themselves look good. I wonder if JBE cares either?

Isn't LED in the administration?

Where is IB?
Posted by Snipe
Member since Nov 2015
17155 posts
Posted on 12/3/18 at 4:11 pm to
IN b4 IBs rant
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
40159 posts
Posted on 12/3/18 at 4:22 pm to
The entire thing has always been an indefensible giveaway.
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
41615 posts
Posted on 12/3/18 at 5:15 pm to
Does IB hang out on the O-T? Or just poli board?

Side note... I saw something over the weekend that was being promoted.

Basically, $1 of film credit generates $4.35 in economic impact. Of course, this was being promoted as "great" for the state.

And maybe it is "great" for providing jobs, etc.

But even if that full amount of economic impact is taxed in LA, you are looking at 27 cents. So, it's costing the state treasury 73 cents.

This is the problem. People will look at this program and say "it's working" and others will say "it's a giveaway" and both are right.
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
29841 posts
Posted on 12/3/18 at 5:30 pm to
Only a matter of time before Susie Labry and her group of whiny film subsidy lovers start complaining about this article being “unfair”.
Posted by TigerRob20
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2008
3733 posts
Posted on 12/3/18 at 6:23 pm to
You may want to read the report and LEDs response to the two findings.....



LINK

quote:

All three of these programs now have statutorily mandated issuance caps that LED cannot exceed and the estimates of project expenditures in process for which tax credits are issued indicated that the caps would be reached. Consequently, the major forecasting factors are known and there is no finding by your office of inaccuracy in the projections that were provided. These known factors are avoided in the report, which over emphasizes “documentation” in lieu of common sense without ever identifying the “documentation” that should have been used or should be used when confronted with similar circumstances in the future. As a result, this recommendation is neither well-founded in fact nor utility.


And there’s a reason it was ‘overstated’:

quote:

While there is a low and high range of estimates presented in the independent study commissioned every two years to review the entertainment programs, LED feels the best data to present demonstrates the highest economic impact, and conversely the highest (worst) negative impact to the state’s fiscal standing. LED feels strongly that the state fiscal impact should not be reported without reporting the state economic impact. LED believes that this is sound and prudent fiscal management for the program and finds nothing in the report that would contradict this fact.
This post was edited on 12/3/18 at 6:29 pm
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
135363 posts
Posted on 12/3/18 at 6:52 pm to
quote:

IN b4 IBs rant
IB is in timeout.
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
41615 posts
Posted on 12/3/18 at 6:56 pm to
Wait what did IB do?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram