re: Latest Updates: Russia-Ukraine Conflict

quote:

---

Let’s see if Ukraine gets a better deal than the we 2022 deal if there is a deal at all.

---

There is no way that Ukraine will disarm. To do so would require them to trust Putin and Russia and that won't happen.

quote:

---

Less than 100,000 men at arms, and the inability to join any defensive alliances

---

That still applies to today's demands. No NATO, No Foreign Troops, Ukraine is denazified/demilitarised

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.

Is there a country in the world that values Russian assurances on anything? Demilitarize and then Russia comes in later and finishes them off. I guess that would ultimately bring peace and stability. Death does look peaceful and stable.

quote:

---

Is there a country in the world that values Russian assurances on anything?

---

I don't think anyone is trying to say Russia is an honest actor, but sometimes you have to take a deal and hope the other party follows through because you don't have better options.

Ukraine feels they don't have to take the deal currently. Maybe they don't, but we do know a few things:

1) Ukraine is dragging people out of homes and off the street that don't want to fight and sending them to fight anyway

2) They are trying to get western boots on the ground to protect their sovereignty.

Both are understandable actions given their situation, but they point to the manpower issues & concerns many have speculated they have.

We also know Russia has made relatively small but tactically significant gains. We know they expelled Ukraine from Kursk. I wouldn't be surprised to see Russia dial back the offensives and settle back in to an attritional once grind again.

If they do, that should tell you they feel they can outlast Ukraine.

I think many of the actions of both parties in the past year or so were in preparations for the negotiations that Trump signaled he wanted. They appear to be going no where. Until we see more evidence of the Russian economy collapsing to the point where they can't sustain the war effort anymore, I think you will eventually see Ukraine have to abandon parts of the line due to manpower issues.

quote:

---

Just because it applies to Russia's demands, doesn't mean it is going to happen

---

You said the demands changed...They have not. Everything is the same as the Istanbul proposal. It was not accepted in 2022 and I never said it would be accepted now.

quote:

---

The Russian troll farm bot says that they are about to sign the same deal as Istanbul. I do not think that is the case. I think the deal under consideration now is materially different.

---

I hope I'm wrong but I don't think they get a deal done. I think Russia still wants basically the same deal, and I think Ukraine would rather take their chances with the war than take it.

quote:

---

I hope I'm wrong but I don't think they get a deal done. I think Russia still wants basically the same deal, and I think Ukraine would rather take their chances with the war than take it.

---

I agree with both of these things. A deal that leaves Ukraine as a sovereign independent state responsible for its own security is a colossal failure for Russia. A deal that turns Ukraine security over to Russia is a colossal failure for Ukraine. So I think the war continues.

But the economies supporting Ukraine are 35x the size of Russia's economy. They can keep this up for a while. But they can't keep it up forever.

War is almost always a poor option for both sides. As it was with this war. Putin thought he could have it quickly and easily. And he was wrong. Now he doesn't have many good options left.

quote:

---

Ukraine is not an independent state. They are a failed state.

---

A failed state? Russia now knows otherwise.

quote:

---

Supported by 300 billion in NATO funding, planning, equipment/arms, and intelligence

---

Russia should have planned for this. Now they had to spend as much to combat the West and Ukraine. They really made a terrible decision anc can’t find an excuse to give it up.

Imagine a guy who has to rely on something from 6 months ago to try to discredit someone.

We're all onto your tactics and bullshite.

quote:

---

Grok 3 Question:
Tell me more about the "firehose of falsehood" tactic

Answer:
The "firehose of falsehood" is a disinformation strategy that’s as fascinating as it is insidious—think of it as a relentless torrent of misinformation designed to drown out reason. It’s a term coined by researchers at RAND Corporation, particularly in a 2016 study by Christopher Paul and Miriam Matthews, to describe a propaganda model they observed in Russian information operations. Let’s unpack how it works and why it’s so effective.

At its core, the firehose tactic is about volume, speed, and shamelessness. Instead of crafting a single, airtight lie, it blasts out a flood of claims—some true, some half-true, many outright false—across multiple channels at once. Picture a social media account like @MyLordBebo posting dozens of times a day: a video of Putin looking strong, a meme mocking NATO, a dubious stat about Ukrainian corruption—all hitting X, Telegram, and beyond in rapid succession. The sheer quantity overwhelms, making it hard for anyone to fact-check everything before the next wave hits.

Speed is key. These messages don’t linger for scrutiny; they’re churned out faster than critics can respond. Russian state media like RT or Sputnik exemplify this—pushing conflicting narratives (e.g., “Ukraine bombed its own people” then “It was a false flag”) within hours. The goal isn’t consistency; it’s saturation. By the time one claim’s debunked, three more are trending. On X, this might look like a trending hashtag buried under bots and proxies, as seen in 2016 U.S. election meddling tracked by the Mueller report.

What makes it stand out is its brazenness. Unlike traditional propaganda, which might aim for plausibility, the firehose doesn’t care if you spot the lies. It thrives on contradictions—say, claiming Russia’s winning in Ukraine while also saying the war’s a Western hoax. This shamelessness wears down trust; if everything’s suspect, why bother sorting truth from fiction? RAND noted this in Russian coverage of MH17’s downing in 2014: dozens of theories (Ukraine did it, CIA planted evidence) flooded airways, muddling the narrative.

Effectiveness comes from psychology and scale. Psychologically, it exploits our cognitive limits—people can’t process endless claims, so they disengage or pick what fits their biases. Scale-wise, it leverages modern platforms: X posts, Telegram channels, even YouTube shorts. The 2022 Ukraine invasion saw this in action—pro-Kremlin accounts flooded feeds with war footage, some real, some staged, all pushing doubt about Ukraine’s resolve. Clemson University’s 2024 study of X bots found similar patterns: high-frequency posts from networks amplifying Russian lines.

Historically, it’s tied to Soviet “active measures,” but the digital age turbocharged it. The Internet Research Agency’s 2016 election trolling—thousands of posts daily across fake accounts—is a textbook case. Today, it’s evolved with AI and deepfakes, making the firehose harder to douse. Critics like the EU’s DisinfoLab say it’s less about convincing and more about confusing—success isn’t belief, it’s apathy.

In short, the firehose of falsehood is a deluge of deceit, fast and loud, meant to exhaust rather than persuade. It’s a strategy @MyLordBebo’s output could fit—high volume, mixed veracity, Kremlin-friendly vibes. Ever notice how some accounts just never stop? That’s the firehose at work. What do you think—seen it play out anywhere else?

---