Started By
Message

re: Latest Updates: Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Posted on 3/20/25 at 7:43 pm to
Posted by John Barron
The Mar-a-Lago Club
Member since Sep 2024
17101 posts
Posted on 3/20/25 at 7:43 pm to
quote:

So your Grok output


My Grok output did not site "The Rand Corporation" as a credible source of information.
Posted by Chromdome35
Fast lane, behind a slow driver
Member since Nov 2010
8182 posts
Posted on 3/20/25 at 7:56 pm to
Here is another Grok 3 response that doesn't cite Rand.

Question:
Since January 2023, how much land has Russia captured in Ukraine and why haven't they captured more?

Answer:
Since January 2023, Russia has captured a net total of approximately 5,655 square kilometers (2,184 square miles) of Ukrainian territory, based on data aggregated from various analyses up to the end of 2024, with projections adjusted to the current date of March 20, 2025. This figure accounts for territorial gains and losses, primarily in eastern Ukraine, with significant advances in 2024. Here’s a breakdown and explanation of why Russia hasn’t captured more, despite its military resources.

Territorial Gains Since January 2023
2023 Gains: Russia captured a net total of about 487 square kilometers (188 square miles) throughout the year, according to the Institute for the Study of War (ISW). This was a modest increase, reflecting a stalemate after Ukraine’s successful 2022 counteroffensives reclaimed significant ground, such as in Kharkiv and Kherson. Russian gains were concentrated in the east, notably around Bakhmut, but were offset by Ukrainian recoveries elsewhere.
2024 Gains: The pace accelerated dramatically, with Russia capturing around 4,168 square kilometers (1,609 square miles) by December 31, 2024, per AFP’s analysis of ISW data. Key advances occurred in Donetsk (e.g., Avdiivka, Vuhledar, and Kurakhove) and along the Pokrovsk axis, with peak gains in October (610 sq km) and November (725 sq km). December saw a slowdown to 465 sq km, suggesting a tapering momentum.
2025 (January to March 20): Assuming a continued but reduced pace—given winter conditions, Ukrainian resistance, and Russian resource constraints—Russia likely captured an additional 1,000 square kilometers or less. This estimate aligns with historical trends (e.g., 547 sq km reported by May 2024 per Russia’s Defense Minister Shoigu) and analyst projections of a slower grind in early 2025. Thus, a rough total since January 2023 stands at 5,655 sq km, or about 0.94% of Ukraine’s total area (603,548 sq km).

Why Russia Hasn’t Captured More
Russia’s limited territorial progress, despite over two years of intense fighting since 2023, stems from a mix of internal weaknesses, Ukrainian resilience, and external factors. Here’s why:

Military Inefficiency and Losses:
Russia has suffered enormous casualties—estimated at over 600,000 killed or wounded by late 2024—draining its pool of experienced troops. Replacements, including mobilized conscripts and foreign recruits (e.g., North Koreans), often lack adequate training, reducing combat effectiveness. Equipment losses are similarly staggering, with thousands of tanks and artillery pieces destroyed, forcing reliance on refurbished Soviet stocks or imports from allies like Iran and North Korea, which can’t fully offset the depletion.

Logistical and Corruption Issues:
Corruption has hollowed out Russia’s military capacity. Pre-war budgets were mismanaged, leaving equipment poorly maintained or unfinished (e.g., the T-14 Armata debacle). On the battlefield, supply lines remain vulnerable—Ukraine’s drone and HIMARS strikes have repeatedly disrupted fuel and ammunition deliveries. Incompetent leadership, rooted in a loyalty-driven promotion system, exacerbates these problems, as seen in the chaotic initial invasion and slow adaptation to Ukraine’s tactics.

Ukrainian Resistance and Innovation:

Ukraine’s military has proven adaptable, leveraging Western-supplied weapons (e.g., ATACMS, Storm Shadow missiles) and a booming domestic drone industry (1.2 million units produced in 2024) to target Russian assets deep behind lines. The 2024 Kursk offensive, where Ukraine seized 1,250 sq km of Russian territory, forced Russia to divert resources, stalling its eastern push. Ukraine’s entrenched defenses and high morale—bolstered by a unifying national cause—have made every kilometer costly for Russia.

Western Support:
Over $100 billion in U.S. military aid since 2022, alongside European contributions (e.g., potential German Taurus missiles), has kept Ukraine in the fight. Advanced systems like Patriot defenses and F-16 jets (delivered in 2024) counter Russia’s air superiority, while sanctions cripple Moscow’s ability to replenish high-tech weaponry. Though delays in aid—like U.S. debates over long-range strike permissions—limit Ukraine’s counteroffensives, this support prevents a Russian breakthrough.

Strategic Missteps and Attrition:
Russia’s initial goal of rapid conquest failed in 2022, shifting the war into a slog of attrition it’s ill-equipped to win decisively. Putin’s fixation on holding annexed territories (18% of Ukraine as of 2025) ties up forces in static defense, while offensives like Pokrovsk yield marginal gains at disproportionate cost—sometimes 1,000 casualties daily in 2024. The lack of a coherent endgame, beyond grinding out small victories, limits strategic ambition.

Context and Constraints
At this pace—roughly 2,500 sq km annually in 2024—conquering Ukraine’s remaining 80% (482,000 sq km) would take over a century, as some observers wryly note. Russia’s gains, while real, are dwarfed by the resources expended: hundreds of billions spent, a sanctioned economy, and a military stretched thin. Ukraine’s ability to hold the line, inflict asymmetric damage, and retain international backing ensures Russia can’t translate its “might” into decisive control, keeping the conflict a brutal stalemate as of March 20, 2025.
Posted by John Barron
The Mar-a-Lago Club
Member since Sep 2024
17101 posts
Posted on 3/20/25 at 8:15 pm to
quote:

Russia has suffered enormous casualties—estimated at over 600,000


Estimated vs Factual Information...Like using obituary information instead of "trust me bro". If either Russia or Ukraine lost 600k soldiers the War would be over with.


The number of verified Russian troops killed in Ukraine has surpassed 90,000, nearly three years after the Kremlin launched its full-scale invasion, according to an independent tally by the BBC’s Russian service and the Mediazona news website.

The outlets rely on open-source information, such as official statements, obituaries and social media posts to compile their figures. Moscow rarely comments on its military losses in what it insists on calling a “special military operation.”


LINK


Posted by Chromdome35
Fast lane, behind a slow driver
Member since Nov 2010
8182 posts
Posted on 3/20/25 at 8:24 pm to
Grok 3 on casualties:

Question:
How many casualties KIA / WIA / MIA has Russia incurred in the war with Ukraine? Differentiate between hard numbers and estimates.

Answer:
Determining the exact number of Russian casualties—killed in action (KIA), wounded in action (WIA), and missing in action (MIA)—in the war with Ukraine is challenging due to limited official data, conflicting reports, and deliberate obfuscation by both sides. Russia does not regularly publish detailed casualty figures, treating such information as a state secret, while Ukraine and Western sources provide estimates that vary widely. Below, I’ll differentiate between "hard numbers" (confirmed or officially acknowledged figures) and "estimates" (derived from analysis, intelligence, or indirect sources) based on available data as of March 20, 2025.

Hard Numbers
Hard numbers refer to casualties explicitly confirmed by official Russian statements, independent counts of named individuals (e.g., obituaries), or verifiable primary sources. These are typically lower bounds due to underreporting and incomplete records.

KIA (Killed in Action):
Mediazona and BBC Russian Count: As of February 22, 2025, BBC Russian, alongside Mediazona and volunteers, documented 95,000 Russian military deaths based on open-source data—obituaries, social media, cemetery records, and official reports. By March 20, 2025, this figure likely exceeds 97,000, assuming a continued rate of 1,000-1,500 daily casualties (per UK estimates). This is a hard count of named individuals, not an estimate, though it captures only a fraction of the total (estimated at 45-65% of actual deaths by analysts cited by BBC).
Russian Official Admissions: Russia has acknowledged only about 6,000 KIA as of mid-2023 (per Al Jazeera, July 2023), an outdated and widely discredited figure given subsequent escalations. No recent official KIA numbers have been released by Moscow.
WIA (Wounded in Action):
No specific hard numbers for WIA are consistently confirmed by Russia. The Mediazona/BBC project focuses on deaths, not injuries, and Russia does not disclose wounded counts. WIA figures are typically inferred from KIA ratios (see estimates below).
MIA (Missing in Action):
Hard data on MIA is virtually nonexistent from Russian sources. Ukraine’s General Staff occasionally reports captured Russian soldiers (e.g., 5,600 by June 2022), but MIA figures—those unaccounted for, neither confirmed dead nor captured—are not systematically tracked in open records. Analysts like Dmitry Kobak (cited by Al Jazeera, July 2023) note missing soldiers are excluded from confirmed counts, adding uncertainty.
Total Confirmed Casualties: The most reliable hard number is the 97,000+ KIA from Mediazona/BBC’s ongoing tally, updated through mid-March 2025. This excludes WIA and MIA, which lack hard confirmation.

Estimates
Estimates come from Western intelligence, Ukrainian claims, statistical models, and independent analyses. These vary widely due to differing methodologies, access to classified data, and potential bias. They aim to capture the full scope, including unreported losses.

KIA (Killed in Action):
Ukrainian Claims: As of February 1, 2025, Ukraine’s General Staff reported 839,040 Russian "combat losses" (Web ID: 4), often interpreted as KIA, though this likely includes some WIA. By March 20, 2025, this could exceed 870,000, given a reported 1,000-1,500 daily loss rate. Zelensky claimed 198,000 Russian KIA by December 8, 2024 (Web ID: 5), a figure possibly closer to reality than the higher totals but still unverified.
Western Intelligence: U.S. estimates peg Russian KIA at 115,000 by October 2024 (Web ID: 11), with Meduza estimating 165,000 by year-end 2024 (Web ID: 0). The Economist’s mid-2024 range of 462,000-728,000 total casualties implies 92,000-145,000 KIA (using a 1:4 KIA-to-WIA ratio). By March 2025, U.S. figures likely approach 130,000-150,000 KIA, factoring in 45,680 casualties in November 2024 alone (Web ID: 16).
Statistical Models: Meduza’s June 2024 estimate of 120,000 KIA (Web ID: 0), based on excess mortality and probate data, could reach 140,000-170,000 by March 2025, aligning with BBC’s projection of over 165,000 by late 2024 if trends hold.

WIA (Wounded in Action):
U.S. Assessments: The U.S. estimated 500,000 WIA by October 2024 (Web ID: 11), part of a 615,000 total casualty figure. Earlier, a declassified U.S. report (December 2023, Web ID: 9) cited 315,000 total casualties, with 170,000-180,000 WIA. By March 2025, WIA could range from 550,000-600,000, assuming a 3:1 or 4:1 wounded-to-killed ratio.
Ukrainian Claims: Zelensky’s December 2024 figure of 550,000 Russian wounded (Web ID: 5) suggests a conservative WIA estimate, possibly rising to 570,000-600,000 by March 2025.
UK Estimates: The UK Ministry of Defence reported 800,000 total casualties by late 2024 (Web ID: 16), implying 600,000-650,000 WIA if KIA is 150,000-200,000.

MIA (Missing in Action):
Estimates for MIA are speculative and often folded into KIA or WIA totals. Leaked U.S. documents from April 2023 (Web ID: 7) suggested 189,500-223,000 total casualties, with no specific MIA breakout. Analysts like Kobak note missing soldiers could number in the “thousands” (Web ID: 14), potentially 10,000-20,000 by 2025, though many are likely dead but unconfirmed. Ukraine’s early 2022 claim of 5,600 captured (Web ID: 0) offers a partial MIA proxy, but no recent updates exist.

Total Estimated Casualties:
Low-End: U.S. October 2024 figure of 615,000 (115,000 KIA, 500,000 WIA) could reach 650,000-700,000 by March 2025, adding 1,000 daily casualties over 160 days.
High-End: Ukrainian claims near 900,000 (mostly KIA/WIA) by March 2025, or The Economist’s upper bound of 728,000 (mid-2024), potentially hitting 800,000-850,000 with late 2024’s intense fighting (e.g., 1,523 daily average, Web ID: 16).
Consensus Range: Most credible estimates (U.S., UK, Meduza) suggest 700,000-800,000 total casualties by March 20, 2025, with KIA at 130,000-170,000, WIA at 550,000-650,000, and MIA as a smaller, uncertain fraction (10,000-20,000).

Summary
Hard Numbers: 97,000+ KIA (Mediazona/BBC, March 2025 extrapolation); WIA and MIA lack confirmed counts, likely in the tens of thousands combined.
Estimates: KIA: 130,000-170,000; WIA: 550,000-600,000; MIA: 10,000-20,000; Total: 700,000-800,000, with outliers as high as 900,000 (Ukraine) or as low as 615,000 (U.S., pre-2025).
The gap between hard numbers and estimates reflects Russia’s secrecy, the war’s scale, and the difficulty of tracking losses in real time. Hard counts lag due to incomplete reporting, while estimates risk inflation or undercounting, depending on the source. The true toll likely lies within the consensus range, skewed toward the higher end given 2024’s escalation.
Posted by StormyMcMan
USA
Member since Oct 2016
4691 posts
Posted on 3/20/25 at 8:30 pm to
ISW Update March 20

quote:

Key Takeaways:

Ukrainian forces conducted a drone strike against Engels Airbase in Saratov Oblast on the night of March 19 to 20.

Russia, Ukraine, and the United States have not yet concluded the details of the moratorium against energy infrastructure strikes. The Ukrainian strike against Engels Airbase would not have been subject to this moratorium in any event because it is a military target.

The Kremlin announced that Russia and the United States will hold another round of talks in Riyadh, Saudia Arabia on March 24, and it is unclear whether these talks will include Ukraine.

Kremlin officials continue to amplify narratives indicating that Russian President Vladimir Putin remains committed to his long-standing goals of conquering Ukraine and is attempting to leverage upcoming ceasefire negotiations to secure preemptive concessions from Ukraine and the United States.

Kremlin officials are also working to exacerbate tension between the United States and its European allies in order to break Western support for Ukraine and undermine the NATO alliance.

Putin continues to condition domestic Russian audiences to prepare for a protracted war in Ukraine rather than a sustainable peace built on compromise.

The Kremlin is intensifying efforts to change the demographic makeup of occupied Ukraine in order to legitimize Putin's claim over occupied areas.

The Kremlin also continues Russifying Ukrainian children in occupied areas to further the destruction of Ukrainian national and cultural identity and to portray Russia as the humane governor of occupied Ukraine.

Kremlin officials continue advertising the possibility of future economic cooperation with the United States, likely to extract preemptive concessions from the United States in ceasefire or peace negotiations.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and US President Donald Trump spoke about investments in Ukraine's energy infrastructure during their call on March 19.

US State Department Spokesperson Tammy Bruce condemned North Korea's involvement in Russia's war against Ukraine on March 19 and expressed concern about Russian support to North Korea.

Ukraine’s allies continue to provide financial and material military assistance to Ukraine, including funds from frozen Russian assets in Europe.

Ukrainian forces recently advanced in Belgorod Oblast and Russian forces recently advanced in Kursk Oblast and near Toretsk, Pokrovsk, and Velyka Novosilka

Russia may extend military veteran status to Russian milbloggers and military correspondents covering the war in Ukraine, likely in an effort to further coopt and appease the Russian ultranationalist milblogger community.


Posted by John Barron
The Mar-a-Lago Club
Member since Sep 2024
17101 posts
Posted on 3/20/25 at 8:34 pm to
"Why is Ukraine Manpower and corruption situation so bad that they are kidnapping and beating people off the streets"


Ukraine’s manpower and corruption issues have reached critical levels due to a combination of prolonged war, systemic inefficiencies, and societal strain, though the situation is complex and reports of "kidnapping and beating" reflect both reality and exaggeration.

The war with Russia, now in its third year, has decimated Ukraine’s military-aged population. Heavy casualties—estimated in the tens of thousands—and a shrinking pool of willing recruits have left the armed forces desperate. Russia’s losses are reportedly even higher (e.g., Ukraine claims Moscow lost over 835,000 men by January 2025), but Ukraine’s smaller population can’t absorb such attrition as easily. Draft evasion is rampant, with many men hiding or fleeing the country, forcing the government to intensify conscription efforts. Videos circulating online, like one from early March 2025 showing a man walking his dog being forced into a van, highlight aggressive tactics by recruitment officers. These incidents, while not universal, fuel perceptions of "street kidnappings." The Ukrainian military has acknowledged manpower shortages, with units like the 157th Mechanized Brigade crumbling due to inexperienced troops, and voluntary recruitment of 18- to 24-year-olds starting in 2025 to offset the deficit.

Corruption exacerbates the crisis. Despite progress in transparency and anti-corruption measures (e.g., streamlining procurement), scandals persist, particularly in the Defense Ministry. For instance, in January 2025, Minister Rustem Umerov faced an investigation for alleged abuse of power over procurement decisions. Such incidents erode trust, making citizens skeptical of the war effort and less willing to serve. Recruits often report mistreatment—beatings and abuse during mobilization are documented, with cases like a soldier’s murder in Poltava Oblast in February 2025 underscoring the violence. This feeds a cycle: corruption undermines morale, low morale drives draft dodging, and desperation leads to coercive tactics.
Social tension and Russian disinformation amplify the problem. Attacks on draft officers have risen, fueled by frustration over unequal burdens—rural and poor communities disproportionately bear the load while the elite often escape service. Russian propaganda exploits these incidents, exaggerating "kidnappings" to destabilize Ukraine further. Meanwhile, the government resists lowering the conscription age to 18 (it’s still 25), fearing a demographic collapse, which limits options.

In short, Ukraine’s situation is dire because war has strained its human and institutional resources to the breaking point. Coercive conscription and corruption are symptoms of a system under siege, not the whole story—but they’re real enough to spark outrage and despair."


Your Grok analysis said a estimated 600k lost Russian soldiers and this one says Ukraine Claims 835k lost Russian Soldiers. I guess that's what happens when it's relying on numbers from Ukraine




Posted by Chromdome35
Fast lane, behind a slow driver
Member since Nov 2010
8182 posts
Posted on 3/20/25 at 8:36 pm to
quote:

Social tension and Russian disinformation amplify the problem. Attacks on draft officers have risen, fueled by frustration over unequal burdens—rural and poor communities disproportionately bear the load while the elite often escape service. Russian propaganda exploits these incidents, exaggerating "kidnappings" to destabilize Ukraine further.
Posted by John Barron
The Mar-a-Lago Club
Member since Sep 2024
17101 posts
Posted on 3/20/25 at 8:44 pm to
quote:

Hard Numbers: 97,000+ KIA (Mediazona/BBC, March 2025 extrapolation); WIA and MIA lack confirmed counts, likely in the tens of thousands combined.


Thanks for confirming exactly what I said. Anyone believing that this War would still be going on if Ukraine or Russia has lost KIA/WIA 800k soldier’s than you lose all credibility. I stand by my numbers that I said before that Mediazona/BBC 97k report came out in January

Russia= 150k KIA and 200k WIA

Ukraine= 250k KIA and 300k WIA

Ukraine has lost more Soldiers because of the Artillery advantage Russia has on the front lines
Posted by Chromdome35
Fast lane, behind a slow driver
Member since Nov 2010
8182 posts
Posted on 3/20/25 at 8:49 pm to
Grok 3 (last one of these I'm going to post for now)

Question:
List Russia's justifications for the war in Ukraine and rate the truthfulness of each justification on a scale of 1 to 100 with 1 representing absolutely false and 100 absolutely true

Answer:
Russia’s official justifications for its war in Ukraine, launched on February 24, 2022, have been articulated primarily by President Vladimir Putin and Kremlin spokespeople through speeches, state media, and official statements. These justifications have evolved but center on a core set of claims. Below, I’ll list the main ones, provide their stated reasoning, and rate their truthfulness on a scale from 1 (absolutely false) to 100 (absolutely true), based on evidence, expert analysis, and observable outcomes as of March 20, 2025. I’ll keep the assessments concise and grounded.

### Russia’s Justifications and Truthfulness Ratings

1. **"To Protect Russian-Speaking Populations from Genocide"**
- **Claim**: Russia alleges Ukraine was committing genocide against Russian-speaking people in Donbas, necessitating intervention to save them from persecution by a “neo-Nazi” regime.
- **Evidence**: No credible evidence supports a genocide. The UN Human Rights Monitoring Mission documented civilian deaths in Donbas (over 3,000 since 2014), mostly from shelling by both sides, but found no systematic ethnic cleansing. Ukraine’s government, led by Jewish President Volodymyr Zelensky, contradicts the “neo-Nazi” label. Russia’s own actions—bombing Russian-speaking cities like Mariupol—undermine this narrative.
- **Rating**: 5/100. Minimal basis in pre-war Donbas tensions, but vastly exaggerated and disproven by lack of genocide evidence and Russia’s conduct.

2. **"To Denazify Ukraine"**
- **Claim**: Putin asserts Ukraine’s government is run by neo-Nazis, rooted in WWII-era collaborationist groups like Stepan Bandera’s OUN, requiring Russia to dismantle this ideology.
- **Evidence**: Ukraine has far-right elements (e.g., Azov Battalion), but they’re marginal—Azov’s political wing polled under 2% in 2019. Zelensky’s election and diverse government refute Nazi dominance. Russia amplifies historical grievances (Bandera’s legacy) without proof of current Nazi governance. The claim’s absurdity grew as Russia killed civilians indiscriminately.
- **Rating**: 3/100. Tiny kernel of truth in fringe groups’ existence, but a gross distortion of Ukraine’s political reality.

3. **"To Demilitarize Ukraine and Prevent NATO Expansion"**
- **Claim**: Russia says Ukraine’s growing military and NATO ties threatened its security, justifying preemptive action to neutralize this risk and stop NATO’s eastward push.
- **Evidence**: Ukraine wasn’t a NATO member and had no imminent accession timeline in 2022—NATO rejected its bid in 2008 and remained cautious. Ukraine’s military grew post-2014, but it was defensive, not poised to invade Russia. Ironically, the war drove Ukraine closer to NATO (2024 F-16s, membership talks) and militarized it further (1.2 million drones in 2024). Russia’s security concerns were real but overstated.
- **Rating**: 20/100. Some truth in Russia’s geopolitical fears, but Ukraine posed no immediate threat, and the war backfired on this goal.

4. **"To Defend the Donetsk and Luhansk People’s Republics (DPR/LPR)"**
- **Claim**: Russia says it intervened to protect the self-proclaimed DPR and LPR, recognized by Moscow days before the invasion, from Ukrainian aggression.
- **Evidence**: The DPR/LPR, formed in 2014 with Russian backing, faced Ukrainian efforts to retake them, causing civilian harm (UN: 13,000+ total deaths by 2022). However, Russia fueled the conflict by arming separatists and deploying troops pre-2022 (e.g., MH17 shootdown). The “protection” pretext ignores Russia’s role in creating and escalating the crisis.
- **Rating**: 25/100. Partial truth in local fighting, but Russia’s instigation and broader invasion (beyond Donbas) discredit the justification.

5. **"To Restore Historical Unity"**
- **Claim**: Putin argues Ukraine is an artificial state, historically part of Russia (e.g., Kyivan Rus’, Soviet Union), and the war reunites a fractured nation.
- **Evidence**: Shared history exists—Kyivan Rus’ (9th-13th centuries) predates modern states, and Ukraine was under Russian/Soviet rule for centuries. Yet, Ukraine’s distinct identity, language, and sovereignty (recognized globally since 1991) refute this. The war has solidified Ukrainian nationhood, not erased it—polls show 90%+ reject Russian rule (2024 Kyiv Institute data).
- **Rating**: 15/100. Historical ties are real, but the claim ignores Ukraine’s modern legitimacy and popular will.

6. **"To Counter Western Aggression and Encroachment"**
- **Claim**: Russia portrays the war as a defensive stand against a U.S.-led West using Ukraine as a proxy to weaken or destroy Russia.
- **Evidence**: NATO’s post-Cold War expansion (e.g., Baltic states in 2004) and U.S. support for Ukraine post-2014 (training, aid) fed Russian paranoia. No evidence shows a Western plan to invade Russia via Ukraine—NATO’s 2022 posture was defensive. The war, however, escalated Western involvement (e.g., $100B+ U.S. aid), fulfilling Russia’s own prophecy.
- **Rating**: 30/100. Some basis in Russia’s perception of NATO as a threat, but no proof of an imminent Western attack justifies the invasion.

### Overview and Context
Russia’s justifications blend historical grievances, security concerns, and fabricated crises, often presented via state media like RT to domestic and sympathetic audiences. Truthfulness ratings are low because:
- Independent investigations (UN, OSCE) debunk genocide and Nazi claims.
- The war’s scope—targeting Kyiv, Kharkiv, and beyond Donbas—exceeds stated goals.
- Outcomes (Ukraine’s NATO tilt, national unity) contradict Russia’s aims.

The highest-rated claims (20-30) reflect genuine Russian anxieties about NATO and Donbas, but even these are inflated or self-inflicted. Most hover near 1-5, as they rely on distortion or outright falsehoods unsupported by evidence. Putin’s July 2021 essay on Ukraine’s “historical unity” and February 2022 invasion speech frame these narratives, but three years of war have exposed their hollowness against reality.

Posted by John Barron
The Mar-a-Lago Club
Member since Sep 2024
17101 posts
Posted on 3/20/25 at 8:50 pm to
quote:

Chromdome35


So the kidnappings and beatings are happening as clear evidence by Twitter Videos. But it's Russia Propaganda to report on it. Looks like Grok has a little Bias issue
Posted by Chromdome35
Fast lane, behind a slow driver
Member since Nov 2010
8182 posts
Posted on 3/20/25 at 8:52 pm to
Which AI would you prefer me to use? I only used Grok because you did.

The China AI Deepseek R1, won't answer any of these questions it just says it can't respond to that right now.
Posted by John Barron
The Mar-a-Lago Club
Member since Sep 2024
17101 posts
Posted on 3/20/25 at 8:57 pm to
quote:

Independent investigations (UN, OSCE) debunk


Any Analysis claiming the UN and OSCE are independent investigators is immediately discredited. Try again Chrom


Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
42751 posts
Posted on 3/20/25 at 9:15 pm to
The entire Summary ftom Chromedome’s post:

quote:

Summary Hard Numbers: 97,000+ KIA (Mediazona/BBC, March 2025 extrapolation); WIA and MIA lack confirmed counts, likely in the tens of thousands combined.
Estimates: KIA: 130,000-170,000; WIA: 550,000-600,000; MIA: 10,000-20,000; Total: 700,000-800,000, with outliers as high as 900,000 (Ukraine) or as low as 615,000 (U.S., pre-2025). The gap between hard numbers and estimates reflects Russia’s secrecy, the war’s scale, and the difficulty of tracking losses in real time. Hard counts lag due to incomplete reporting, while estimates risk inflation or undercounting, depending on the source. The true toll likely lies within the consensus range, skewed toward the higher end given 2024’s escalation.


The estimates do not support your numbers.
Posted by CitizenK
BR
Member since Aug 2019
16112 posts
Posted on 3/20/25 at 11:52 pm to
quote:

Which AI would you prefer me to use?


The Russian one, which does not exist
Posted by Chromdome35
Fast lane, behind a slow driver
Member since Nov 2010
8182 posts
Posted on 3/21/25 at 12:11 am to
There is a Russian AI called GigaChat.

https://giga.chat/
Posted by Coeur du Tigre
It was just outside of Barstow...
Member since Nov 2008
4607 posts
Posted on 3/21/25 at 3:43 am to
quote:

Russians report that the Ukrainian Defense Forces have struck the Sudzha gas metering station and a gas pipeline on the border of Russia’s Kursk region and Ukraine’s Sumy region, which carried Russian gas to Europe.
Another oil & gas facility for the hit list. Every single day.

It may be added that this gas pipeline was closed on Jan. 01 of this year after the usage contract expired. But for some reason it was still full of gas. Not any more...

Oh, and one more item - this pipeline was the sole source of Russian gas to Slovakia and Hungary. Kyiv don't play.




Video taken from distance of 13km.

Edited to add:
quote:

The Ukrainian General Staff announced this morning that the gas pipeline in Sudzha was shelled and blown up by the Russian side, not Ukraine. In other words, this is a Russian provocation.
But why? Oh yeah... Russians.
This post was edited on 3/21/25 at 5:59 am
Posted by Coeur du Tigre
It was just outside of Barstow...
Member since Nov 2008
4607 posts
Posted on 3/21/25 at 3:59 am to
Back on 19 March, the Kavkazskaya oil pumping station on the railhead of the pipeline system of JSC Caspian Pipeline Consortium in Kropotkin, Krasnodar Krai, was - wait for it - attacked by drones. After burning for two days the fire fighters have lost containment and the entire railyard / pipeline terminal / storage tank complex is now burning.
quote:

A huge fire erupted unexpectedly overnight at the "Kavkazkaya" oil transshipment hub in Russia’s Krasnodar Krai: "the whole facility went up in flames, it’s a blazing inferno, utterly horrifying".
"Utterly horrifying"...? Speak for yourself, Ivan.

Video of Russian firefighters performing a humanitarian gesture.
Posted by Coeur du Tigre
It was just outside of Barstow...
Member since Nov 2008
4607 posts
Posted on 3/21/25 at 5:45 am to
quote:

German authorities have officially confiscated the Eventin, a tanker of Russia‘s shadow fleet. The cargo will be transferred to the German state and sold. The ship has been impounded in January while being adrift near the German coast. Source: Spiegelonline

As Germany is the Land of Laws, this tells us the vessel owner / charterer had no insurance. This is the way forward on handling these shadow fleet / cable cutters. Board for inspection on high seas (what will the Russians do about it?), check insurance, seize. Time to realize Europe is at war right now.

Posted by Coeur du Tigre
It was just outside of Barstow...
Member since Nov 2008
4607 posts
Posted on 3/21/25 at 6:19 am to
quote:

Residents of Kalach rayon of Volgograd oblast report a large number of explosions at night. The likely target of the aerial attack is the military airfield Marinovka, located in the village of Oktyabrsky of Kalach raion, previously attacked in August 2024.
Another impressive video.

quote:

Russians write that a drone attack is underway on the Marinovka military airfield in the Volgograd region
Possible confirmation of target.
Posted by StormyMcMan
USA
Member since Oct 2016
4691 posts
Posted on 3/21/25 at 6:27 am to
Random tweets

quote:

US negotiations with Ukraine and the US with Russia in Saudi Arabia will take place simultaneously in neighboring rooms, says Keith Kellogg, Special Envoy to the US President.

LINK

quote:

Czech President Petr Pavel was in Odesa during the Russian drone attack.

This was reported by Deputy Prime Minister Oleksii Kuleba.

LINK

quote:

France and Britain have ditched plans to send troops to Ukraine, opting instead for UN peacekeepers as an alternative, per The Telegraph.

LINK

quote:

EU plan to send more military aid to Ukraine in shambles-Politico

LINK
Politco link

quote:

The Kremlin says Putin’s directive to avoid targeting Ukraine’s energy infrastructure is still in place.

:haha: LINK

quote:

The Kremlin says the strike on the Sudzha gas transit station shows Zelensky can’t be trusted.

LINK

quote:

Oil tanks at Russia’s “Kavkazskaya” transshipment hub in Krasnodar Krai were hit overnight in a suspected Ukraine attack. Explosions rocked the site, and fires are still burning as of March 19.

This is a serious fire.

LINK

quote:

Reports say Russian Security Council Secretary Sergei Shoigu has arrived in North Korea. Looks like the Korean cannon fodder’s run dry, and it’s time to pick up a fresh batch.

LINK

quote:

Zelensky’s chief of staff dismisses Russia’s claims that Ukraine attacked the Sudzha gas station as FAKE.

LINK

quote:

Germany has formally seized the Russian shadow fleet tanker Eventin, which was carrying 100,000 tons of oil worth €40 million. - Spiegel

LINK
first pageprev pagePage 4727 of 5046Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram