- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Latest Updates: Russia-Ukraine Conflict
Posted on 3/13/25 at 3:23 pm to Darth_Vader
Posted on 3/13/25 at 3:23 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
is if Ukraine rejects a peace deal and keeps fighting, Putin knows all he has to do to win is to keep attritting the Ukrainian army and within a short time, probably a year or less, Ukraine will reach a point its army can no longer hold a front and will collapse.
You were among the first to accurately call this a stalemate. No more in your eyes?
At least as of right now I don’t think it would be fair to say Ukraine has rejected a peace deal. A clean cease fire has been accepted by Ukraine.
Russia is countering that with what I think would be tantamount to a full surrender to Russia. Honestly, if Ukraine accepted the terms as presented by Russia do you think there would be an independent Ukraine in 5 years? I don’t think there would be.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 3:23 pm to AU86
quote:
100% truth. If they choose not to settle now that are signing their death warrant. And if Trump pulls out they will collapse in 6 months or less.
The only part I’m not certain about is the timing of how much longer Ukraine can hold out. I say that because we don’t have reliable information on Ukraine’s casualties. They downplay them while Russia overstates them. But that’s standard for countries at war to do and is to be expected from both sides.
Six months sounds like a reasonable guess though.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 3:24 pm to VolSquatch
quote:
quote:
So why is Elon freaking out so much?
Probably the domestic terrorism targeting his company, if I had to take a completely wild and speculative guess at it.
Trump calls Tesla boycott ‘illegal' and says he's buying one to support Elon Musk
Trump said "radical left lunatics" are "illegally and collusively" boycotting Tesla
Now I have seen some on the progressive left push things about "boycotting Tesla stock,: which is funny on two levels:
that's like vegans boycotting pork, they aren't stock market investors and won't influence people who are... this isn't some organized "divest" campaign that anybody is paying attention to...
how do you "boycott stock?" You don't buy it... but if you are a stock investor you care about whether it's a good investment and/or offering a good return. Anybody picking their investments on political criteria abandoned Elon quite a while ago, and others were more than happy to buy that stock...
I know some tech bros who own/owned Teslas... they're liberals and leftists, maybe kind of libertarian but socially liberal libertarian. Elon has lost them all over the past year... some of them have sold their Teslas, the others are getting there...
Posted on 3/13/25 at 3:24 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
ETA: and no amount of aid, be it money, ammo, tanks, planes, missiles, etc from the West, can change the mathematics of the manpower issue Ukraine faces. In fact all Putin has to do is take a realistic look at the number of troops Ukraine loses monthly, factor in the dwindling number of new troops Ukraine can raise, and he can easily figure out how much longer it will be before the collapse of Ukraine will happen.
That is obvious to anyone that looks at reality. Those are the hard numbers and facts. Hard to see why anyone can't see this.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 3:26 pm to Lee B
The biggest problem for Tesla is that its long honeymoon as the only bride in town is over. It has competition, now, especially in China.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 3:27 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
Six months sounds like a reasonable guess though.
Lack of intelligence and available inventory. If they don't settle and Trump walks it is going to get ugly.
And then the sky screamers can all start blaming Trump even though they ignore the fact that Biden had 3+ years to prevent this, put Ukraine in a strong position for negotiations or settle it.
This is not Trump's war. He didn't start it and its not his failed policies that got us to the point that we are now. But he is stuck with the mess.
He needs to remove this albatross and focus on what got him elected.
He will eventually have to deal with that disaster in the Middle East also.
This post was edited on 3/13/25 at 3:53 pm
Posted on 3/13/25 at 3:37 pm to AU86
quote:
That is obvious to anyone that looks at reality. Those are the hard numbers and facts. Hard to see why anyone can't see this.
I will relay the answer I've read:
"Ukrainian troops are being killed mostly by mortar fire. The Russians are VERY good at mortar fire.
Russian troops are mostly being killed by drones.
So the equation for Ukraine is can they produce more and more drones and how does that relate to Russia maintaining its pace in tubes and mortar shells?
The tipping point was actually reached on the eastern Ukrainian front in the past couple of months. Russian mortar fire started decreasing, and Ukrainians have been able to recapture some areas because drones go in and eliminate the trenches and tree lines ahead of them.
Russia has drones, too, of course, and they have made their own innovations, but the Ukes might still have just a bit of an advantage, seemingly."
I dunno...
Posted on 3/13/25 at 3:38 pm to ned nederlander
quote:
You were among the first to accurately call this a stalemate. No more in your eyes?
The thing about a stalemate is they’re usually broken all of sudden. Look at the Western Front in WWI. From the fall of 1914 until the summer of 1918 it saw little movement. Really the biggest movement during that time was when the Germans launched their “Kaiser” offensives in Spring 1918. But the German push eventually petered out and the stalemate held. It wasn’t until the fall of 1918 that the German Army began to disintegrate due to the fact the Allies were pumping more and more men into the meat grinder while Germany had reached the end of its strength from a manpower standpoint.
And when that collapse started, the German High Command was powerless to stop it. They recognized the war was lost and sued for peace. Had they not done that in Nov. 1918, the Allies would have swept into Germany at least as far as the Rhine.
If I were to compare where this war is in WWI terms, I’d say we’re in early summer 1918. The Ukrainian Army is being pushed back, but can still sustain a cohesive front. In other words, it still has the appearance of a stalemate. But that appearance is a bit deceptive. The reason I say that is the Russians are fully aware the Ukrainians can’t continue to sustain its losses much longer while Russia can.
And as casualties continue day after day, Ukraine’s strength is slowly being sapped down. Barring a peace agreement, their strength will continue to wane until it finally breaks in the same way the Imperial German Army broke in the fall of 1918.
The only question is will the leaders in Ukraine sue for peace before that inevitable collapse comes? The answer to that question will decide if there is still an independent Ukraine at the end of this war.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 3:44 pm to doubleb
quote:
If Z and NATO agreed to no Ukraine in NATO would that end the war?
At this point...when he is winning...not by itself.
But Russia isn't likely to stop without, at least, this guaranty.
That's a fact.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 3:46 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
The thing about a stalemate is they’re usually broken all of sudden. Look at the Western Front in WWI. From the fall of 1914 until the summer of 1918 it saw little movement. Really the biggest movement during that time was when the Germans launched their “Kaiser” offensives in Spring 1918. But the German push eventually petered out and the stalemate held. It wasn’t until the fall of 1918 that the German Army began to disintegrate due to the fact the Allies were pumping more and more men into the meat grinder while Germany had reached the end of its strength from a manpower standpoint.
And when that collapse started, the German High Command was powerless to stop it. They recognized the war was lost and sued for peace. Had they not done that in Nov. 1918, the Allies would have swept into Germany at least as far as the Rhine.
If I were to compare where this war is in WWI terms, I’d say we’re in early summer 1918. The Ukrainian Army is being pushed back, but can still sustain a cohesive front. In other words, it still has the appearance of a stalemate. But that appearance is a bit deceptive. The reason I say that is the Russians are fully aware the Ukrainians can’t continue to sustain its losses much longer while Russia can.
And as casualties continue day after day, Ukraine’s strength is slowly being sapped down. Barring a peace agreement, their strength will continue to wane until it finally breaks in the same way the Imperial German Army broke in the fall of 1918.
The only question is will the leaders in Ukraine sue for peace before that inevitable collapse comes? The answer to that question will decide if there is still an independent Ukraine at the end of this war.
Great post and spot on comparison.
I do wonder what the response would be from the west if Russia breaks through and it starts looking legitimately possible we could see Russian troops in the streets of Kyiv? What would our response be?
But I don't think it comes to that ultimately. Sanity will eventually prevail.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 3:53 pm to AU86
quote:
That is obvious to anyone that looks at reality. Those are the hard numbers and facts. Hard to see why anyone can't see this.
Those who don’t see it are either ignorant of how war works, or are allowing their emotions and political opinions to override their logic and reason.
If you look way back to the beginning of this tread, you’ll see I’ve always based my statements on logic and facts based on (1) my own military experience and (2) decades of deep study of military strategy and history.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 4:00 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
one. Instead Ukraine will revert back to the state it existed in for roughly 220 of the past 250 years, namely as part of Russia.
And if they agree to Putin’s terms, they de militarize, they de-Nazi (change government), they do all the things Putin wants; how long before they are no longer a free state?
Posted on 3/13/25 at 4:02 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
The answer to that question will decide if there is still an independent Ukraine at the end of this war.
The choice for Ukraine is to cease to be an independent Ukraine today, or later...
My mind keeps going back to this event from my childhood...
BBC: The end of the Cold War
Defeat of the Soviet Union in Afghanistan
It went on for 9 years... but insurgent groups wore down the Afghan military to collapse, and the Soviet military to giving up and withdrawing, Insurgent groups... trained and armed by the US and CIA, but this is David and Goliath stuff...
and it also is what inspired Al Qaeda to take on the Saudi government and the US.
and the parallel might be what just happened in Syria...
I don't doubt that Putin will be just as happy to kill every Ukrainian and reduce the entire country to rubble if it comes down to it and he can...
I don't see where the Ukrainian population complies with being erased, and being made into Russian captives. Especially since I can't see the Russians not being abusive if they gain control over the population at this point.
So can they keep it?
If Russia's economy doesn't collapse, will its demographics still collapse?
What happens when the ethnic Russians of Western Russia are outnumbered by the minorities in other areas?
Posted on 3/13/25 at 4:02 pm to VolSquatch
quote:
I do wonder what the response would be from the west if Russia breaks through and it starts looking legitimately possible we could see Russian troops in the streets of Kyiv? What would our response be?
Our options would be extremely limited at that point. Other than strongly objections at the UN and G7, there really isn’t much we could do unless the West wants to get into a shooting war to save Ukraine. And I don’t see that being very likely.
quote:
But I don't think it comes to that ultimately. Sanity will eventually prevail.
Honestly, I can’t say. The only sign of sanity I’ve seen from the West in the past three years happened just today, namely Trump cutting off Russian oil from Europe. It boggles my mind Europe has been buying oil from Russia all this time. They claim to “stand” with Ukraine. That’s laughable.
Oil is the lifeblood of Russia. It is what keeps its economy afloat. They’re totally dependent on it. The collapse of the Soviet was hastened by the fall of the price of oil in the 80s. Had Europe (and the US) wanted to help Ukraine, they’d have done everything in their power to drive the price of oil as low as possible and not bought any oil from Russia while pressuring the rest of the world to follow suit. That would have brought Putin to the negotiating table within months.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 4:08 pm to AU86
quote:
Lack of intelligence and available inventory. If they don't settle and Trump walks it is going to get ugly.
It’s going to get ugly? You mean it’s going to get uglier, right? It’s really bad right now.
quote:
And then the sky screamers can all start blaming Trump even though they ignore the fact that Biden had 3+ years to prevent this, put Ukraine in a strong position for negotiations or settle it.
It’s not Trump’s fsilt although he did interject himself as some kind of super peace mediator. I don’t blame Biden for the war either, he just didn’t throw more aid to Ukraine in time. Even then it may not have mattered.
I blame Putin. He is the culprit. He is the one that coveted his neighbor. He wanted the war. I will never believe otherwise.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 4:11 pm to DMAN1968
quote:
. That's a fact.
If that was all it took there never would have been a war.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 4:26 pm to Lee B
quote:
My mind keeps going back to this event from my childhood...
BBC: The end of the Cold War Defeat of the Soviet Union in Afghanistan
It went on for 9 years... but insurgent groups wore down the Afghan military to collapse, and the Soviet military to giving up and withdrawing, Insurgent groups... trained and armed by the US and CIA, but this is David and Goliath stuff...
You can’t really expect the Ukrainians to conduct an insurrection in the manner the Afghans did against the Soviets. For starters, the rugged, mountainous terrain in Afghanistan lends itself to an insurrection. Also, in Afghanistan you have a religious fanatical element to draw upon, not just from Afghanistan itself, but the larger Islamic world as well.
Meanwhile, Ukraine is basically flat as a table and already is scraping the bottom of the barrel from a manpower standpoint with a high level of reluctance in its remaining military age population to lay down their life in defense of their country. Basically, the vast majority of those willing to fight for Ukraine have already stepped up to the plate. What’s left over isn’t much, certainly not enough to sustain a long insurrection.
Posted on 3/13/25 at 4:26 pm to doubleb
quote:
blame Putin. He is the culprit. He is the one that coveted his neighbor. He wanted the war. I will never believe otherwise.
You need Tucker Carlson, Jeffrey Sachs (on this issue), Matt Taibbi, and DJT in your life.
The same Deep State that brought us Iraq 2.0, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, and Covid brought us this Ukraine nonsense
This post was edited on 3/13/25 at 4:28 pm
Posted on 3/13/25 at 4:32 pm to Lee B
Atlantic Council: A Russia without Russians? Putin’s disastrous demographics
Russia’s future will be characterized by a smaller population. Russian President Vladimir Putin’s war has virtually guaranteed that for generations to come, Russia’s population will be not only smaller, but also older, more fragile, and less well-educated. It will almost certainly be ethnically less Russian and more religiously diverse. While some might view diversity as a strength, many Russians do not see it this way. In a world with hordes of people on the move to escape war, persecution, poverty, and the increasing impact of climate change, xenophobic political rhetoric sells well.
Putin has spoken frequently about Russia’s demographic problems, beginning in his first months as president. Despite spending trillions of rubles on high-profile “national projects” to remedy the situation, population decline continued. Putin’s choice of timing for military aggression in Ukraine might have reflected an understanding that Russia’s demographic (and economic) situation would not improve in the next two decades. However, the war is turning a growing crisis into a catastrophe.
The demographic consequences from the Russian war against Ukraine, like those from World War II and the health, birth rate and life expectancy impact from Russia’s protracted transition in the 1990s, will echo for generations. Russia’s population will decline for the rest of the twenty-first century, and ethnic Russians will be a smaller proportion of that population. The ethnic and religious groups that embrace the “traditional family values” Putin favors are predominantly non-Russian.
United Nations scenarios project Russia’s population in 2100 to be between 74 million and 112 million compared with the current 146 million. The most recent UN projections are for the world’s population to decline by about 20 percent by 2100. The estimate for Russia is a decline of 25 to 50 percent.
While Russia is hardly unique in facing declining birth rates and an aging population, high adult mortality, and infertility among both men and women, increasingly limited immigration and continuing brain drain make Russia’s situation particularly challenging. Population size is determined by a combination of natural factors—birth rates and life expectancy, along with the emigration-immigration balance. Putin’s war on Ukraine has undermined all the potential sources of population growth.
...
Russia’s future will be characterized by a smaller population. Russian President Vladimir Putin’s war has virtually guaranteed that for generations to come, Russia’s population will be not only smaller, but also older, more fragile, and less well-educated. It will almost certainly be ethnically less Russian and more religiously diverse. While some might view diversity as a strength, many Russians do not see it this way. In a world with hordes of people on the move to escape war, persecution, poverty, and the increasing impact of climate change, xenophobic political rhetoric sells well.
Putin has spoken frequently about Russia’s demographic problems, beginning in his first months as president. Despite spending trillions of rubles on high-profile “national projects” to remedy the situation, population decline continued. Putin’s choice of timing for military aggression in Ukraine might have reflected an understanding that Russia’s demographic (and economic) situation would not improve in the next two decades. However, the war is turning a growing crisis into a catastrophe.
The demographic consequences from the Russian war against Ukraine, like those from World War II and the health, birth rate and life expectancy impact from Russia’s protracted transition in the 1990s, will echo for generations. Russia’s population will decline for the rest of the twenty-first century, and ethnic Russians will be a smaller proportion of that population. The ethnic and religious groups that embrace the “traditional family values” Putin favors are predominantly non-Russian.
United Nations scenarios project Russia’s population in 2100 to be between 74 million and 112 million compared with the current 146 million. The most recent UN projections are for the world’s population to decline by about 20 percent by 2100. The estimate for Russia is a decline of 25 to 50 percent.
While Russia is hardly unique in facing declining birth rates and an aging population, high adult mortality, and infertility among both men and women, increasingly limited immigration and continuing brain drain make Russia’s situation particularly challenging. Population size is determined by a combination of natural factors—birth rates and life expectancy, along with the emigration-immigration balance. Putin’s war on Ukraine has undermined all the potential sources of population growth.
...
Posted on 3/13/25 at 4:36 pm to SirWinston
quote:
The same Deep State that brought us Iraq 2.0, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, and Covid brought us this Ukraine nonsense
Are they also bringing us snatching Greenland by military force, if necessary, and forcing Canada to become a US state, too?
On the latter, I'm all for it!!! That means adding 41,000,000 Socialists (even the right wing) to the US... and it would instantly be the biggest state, 2 senators, probably 55 House Reps, and 57 electoral votes! Add that to California... the Democrats would get a HUGE boost. Good Plan!!!
This post was edited on 3/13/25 at 4:53 pm
Popular
Back to top


1





