- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 12/12/24 at 4:36 am to doubleb
quote:It raises an interesting point, with the obvious caveat "To the victors go the spoils ... and the history books."
Does the Triple Entente meet your qualifications?
Relative to the discussion of "defense" here, it is worth noting the Triple Alliance was founded on the premise of defense against French aggression. Indeed it was a defensive alliance for a quarter century ... until suddenly it wasn't. It is also worth noting, Russia was on the receiving side of that sudden conceptual flip of an alliance from "defensive" to declaring war.
Meanwhile, the Triple Entente was an alliance of established empires. At some point, the conceptual defense of an empire becomes a bit pharisaic, no?
Had WWI been settled in favor of the Central Powers, it's quite likely the history books would have focused on Entente colonial imperialism as the underlying cause. But Germany et al did not prevail. Imperialistic arrogance of the allies persisted as Wilson (since noted by historians as a wonderful progressive luminary) sold Germany down the river at Versailles, setting basis for WWII. Rinse and repeat.
This post was edited on 12/12/24 at 11:23 am
Posted on 12/12/24 at 5:33 am to GOP_Tiger
ISW Update Dec 11
quote:
Key Takeaways:
Russian forces continue to make tactical gains south of Pokrovsk as they attack into Ukrainian weak points and attempt to conduct a turning maneuver to directly assault Pokrovsk from the south.
US intelligence had warned that Russia may fire a second "Oreshnik" ballistic missile at Ukraine in the near future, likely in a continued effort to dissuade the West from providing further military assistance to Ukraine.
Ukrainian forces struck an oil depot in Bryansk Oblast and an aircraft repair plant in Taganrog, Rostov Oblast on the night of December 10 to 11.
Russian forces recently advanced in Kursk Oblast and in the Toretsk, Kurakhove, and Vuhledar directions.
The Kremlin continues to leverage its "Time of Heroes" program to integrate Russian veterans of the war in Ukraine into leadership positions within Russian regional administrations.
Posted on 12/12/24 at 6:04 am to StormyMcMan
Random tweets
LINK
LINK
LINK
LINK
LINK
LINK
LINK
LINK
LINK
LINK
LINK
LINK
quote:
“In a modern world, a victory is only possible in a fast and short war,” Ruslan Pukhov, a prominent Russian military expert, wrote in a column about Syria for the Russian business newspaper Kommersant on Sunday.
“If you can’t secure your success in a military-political sphere, then eventually you will lose, no matter what you do.”
LINK
quote:
??Russia cannot complete a series of new frigates without Ukrainian engines, so it was forced to sell them to India.
The engines for the frigates, which were planned to be used for new missile weapon samples, were made by the "Zorya"-"Mashproekt" plant in Mykolaiv. And without them, as it turned out, it is impossible to build Russian ships.
LINK
quote:
Deputy General Designer Mikhail Shatsky, who was involved in the modernization of the Kh-59 cruise missiles and the development of new UAVs, was shot dead in moscow.
This was reported by russian oppositionist Nevzorov.
We are waiting for official confirmation
LINK
quote:
Talking with putin "was a disappointment," but I would do it again, — German Chancellor Olaf Scholz.
LINK
quote:
Drones attack the territory of the Kadyrov special police regiment in Grozny, Chechnya. There are wounded
The barracks are less than 4 km from the residence of Chechen leader Ramzan Kadyrov. The same complex was attacked by a drone last Wednesday, December 4.
LINK
quote:
Kadyrov's response to a Ukrainian drone strike on a barracks in Chechnya: 84,000 volunteers are now ready to go to the frontline if ordered.
LINK
quote:
Russia is short of 200,000 cops. In some regions, there's a shortage of up to 26% of the required number. I wonder where they might be?
As a solution, they're suggesting scrapping internships altogether and basically turning it into an open-door department. And soon a million "SMO" veterans will start making their way home, and then things will get really interesting.
LINK
quote:
The response to the Ukrainian missile strike on Taganrog will be delivered "at a time and in a manner deemed appropriate," stated presidential press secretary Dmitry Peskov.
"I want to remind you of the clear and unequivocal statement made by the Ministry of Defense yesterday, where it was explicitly said that there will be a response".
LINK
quote:
While Orbán continues to parrot peace slogans, he remains completely unreflective about how much Hungary supports the Kremlin's war machine by doubling down on purchases of Russian gas and oil and, more recently, deciding to pay more for Rosatom's Hungarian nuclear plant project.
LINK
quote:
The U.S. House of Representatives passed the defense budget for 2025, but without a provision to extend the Ukraine Lend-Lease.
This was reported by Ukraine's Ambassador to the United States Oksana Markarova.
According to her, the document will be considered in the Senate next week. The Embassy of Ukraine continues to work actively to preserve the mechanism of the land-lease to support Ukraine.
LINK
quote:
French President Emmanuel Macron will discuss with Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk the deployment of a postwar peacekeeping force in Ukraine
The mission could involve 40,000 personnel and include troops from other countries, according to Politico.
It is worth noting that earlier, Moscow stated that the deployment of peacekeepers requires the consent of both sides in the conflict.
LINK
quote:
We're finally there! A major Russian storage base is practically empty of any equipment! A thread on the newer footage of the 1295th Central Tank Reserve Base
First of all, this thread is almost more an analysis of a pile of junk than a storage base. And before anyone gets picky, I said a MAJOR storage base. You can see that several minor bases are already empty since a while ago.
If you look at the prewar footage from Google Earth, only the highlated parts still stored equipment, everything else were scrapped hulls.
As you can see, the stored equipment dropped pretty fast as soon as the war started
It mostly stored old stuff like T-54/55s, T-62, BMP-1s, BRDM-2s, and even BTR-50s! Tho also 136 T-80s.
And you can also note that some equipment was cannibalized, and the rest of scrapped armor was moved to the huge scrapyard in the eastern part of the base. They keep demolishing to atoms junk placed there.
By now, all that remains are maybe 3 tanks, 23 BMP-1s and 4 BRDM-2s. And even most of those might be scrap, as the snow makes it very difficult to be sure about the condition of their hulls.
Hell, if you take a closer look you can notice they even moved the two broken BTRs stored next to the ARVs and cannibalized BRDM-2s.
Another interesting thing is that, while more than half of the tanks stored here were the oldest types, many of them were kept in good condition with dry air storage systems
At the same time we barely see any T-55s in Ukraine, despite more than half probably removed from storage by now. I think they're instead being mostly converted to BTS-4 ARVs, as they're based in T-54/55 chassis. Otherwise, where would those come from?
In summary, this base is practically done. Maybe 1-2 more months until it is ENTIRELY depleted, but it doesn't really matter at this point. This is just a sign of a bigger problem for Russia. It may have been the smallest major storage base, but...
a major storage base nonetheless. The more bases are emptier, the more they have to pull out from other bases.
So far I've noticed a trend of about ~20 tanks and ~20-30 BMPs removed from each major storage base per month, and this will only accelerate until all that remains is cannibalized equipment.
And as Covert said, the 2456th/103rd is the next one this weekend. Stay tuned for more content!
LINK
Posted on 12/12/24 at 6:34 am to Lima Whiskey
quote:
I think a Russian victory is good for Americans
I could twist myself into a bit of a pretzel and craft a narrative for this
quote:
and Europeans
But no way on this.
Ukraine winning is absolutely the better outcome, I just don't think its worth the cost to get there and I'm not sure its even possible. If our leadership is only doing this to bleed Russia dry while using Ukrainian lives to do it and they know eventually Ukraine will lose, that is extremely barbaric and absolutely not worth it.
Posted on 12/12/24 at 6:35 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
At some point, the conceptual defense of an empire becomes a bit pharisaic, no?
What do you mean?
quote:
Had WWI been settled in favor of the Central Powers, it's quite likely the history books would have focused on Entente colonial imperialism by the as the underlying cause.
You need to read more rigorous history books.
Posted on 12/12/24 at 6:39 am to tigeraddict
quote:
Russia want to annex the eastern oblasts
Correct, and likely they will achieve this
quote:
remove Z
Correct, but TBD on if this happens. Like I said before, I don't think the west is going to let Zelensky refuse an otherwise decent deal if it includes him stepping down.
quote:
remove military and make Ukraine a puppet
I'm sure they would like to do this, but apparently none of that was in any of the drafts they sent to Ukraine for a peace deal. It did place limitations on the military. Per the reporting at the time, Ukraine was unhappy with those limitations, but they weren't necessarily deal breakers for them either.
Posted on 12/12/24 at 6:45 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
At some point, the conceptual defense of an empire becomes a bit pharisaic, no?
You have to keep in mind the time period here. WW1 kind of drug the world kicking and screaming from one era into another... mainly warfare wise, but in other aspects as well.
The era of "empires" was on the downslide. Western leaders at the time were often students of the Roman Empire, learning about what they did well, what they didn't do well, the history of it. In Rome's later years there were huge defense issues, as it was so large but also less powerful than it had been.
Posted on 12/12/24 at 6:47 am to doubleb
quote:
Vol I don’t have to call anyone out, they pop in and out.
Even that post didn't match your claim. I'll post it again in case you forgot.
quote:
Others want Russia to win no matter what it takes.
Nothing about what he said indicates Russia needs to win at all costs.
Posted on 12/12/24 at 7:45 am to GOP_Tiger
quote:
Yes.
I think that Russian combat power is about to decline as they face shortages of armor and artillery.
How long have we be hearing this? Two years?
Is your source Times Radio?
Posted on 12/12/24 at 7:49 am to VolSquatch
quote:
Correct, but TBD on if this happens. Like I said before, I don't think the west is going to let Zelensky refuse an otherwise decent deal if it includes him stepping down.
Based on the latest.polls, I think most Ukrainians would give Zelensky to the Russians to get rid of him.
He is more unpopular than Dementia Joe or the Cackling drunk in Hawaii.
Posted on 12/12/24 at 8:04 am to AU86
quote:
Based on the latest.polls, I think most Ukrainians would give Zelensky to the Russians to get rid of him.
Russian propaganda has made him the bad guy and Putin the hero. I don’t buy into it.
Posted on 12/12/24 at 8:16 am to doubleb
quote:
Russian propaganda has made him the bad guy and Putin the hero. I don’t buy into it.
How much Russian propaganda do you think Ukrainians are getting, honestly? And they are buying it despite what they are seeing with their own eyes? Are they dumb?
Posted on 12/12/24 at 8:21 am to VolSquatch
quote:
Nothing about what he said indicates Russia needs to win at all costs.
I believe you are wrong. I have read enough of his posts to see that no matter what Russia does he is ok with that, but it’s just my opinion.
You do agree that he wants Russia to win, right?
Posted on 12/12/24 at 8:26 am to doubleb
quote:
You do agree that he wants Russia to win, right?
He has said that it would be a better outcome for the US if they did (in his mind), so I would assume he wants them to win.
Posted on 12/12/24 at 8:30 am to VolSquatch
quote:
He has said that it would be a better outcome for the US if they did (in his mind), so I would assume he wants them to win.
We agree!!!!
Posted on 12/12/24 at 8:39 am to doubleb
quote:
We agree!!!!
We actually don't. You said "Win at all costs". I want Ukraine to win. I don't want them to win at all costs. There is an important difference there conceptually in terms of how important you think the issue is. If he was as big of a Russia shill as you claim, he would want them to win no matter the cost. I don't think he does.
Posted on 12/12/24 at 9:00 am to VolSquatch
quote:
We actually don't. You said "Win at all costs". I want Ukraine to win. I don't want them to win at all costs. There is an important difference there conceptually in terms of how important you think the issue is. If he was as big of a Russia shill as you claim, he would want them to win no matter the cost. I don't think he does.
We agree that Lima wants Russia to win right?
We disagree about the last part. He wants Russia to win no matter what it takes.
And I want Ukraine to win no matter what it takes shirt if nukes, chemical weapons or issues with breaking the Geneva Accords, etc.
Posted on 12/12/24 at 9:24 am to doubleb
quote:
And I want Ukraine to win no matter what it takes shirt if nukes, chemical weapons or issues with breaking the Geneva Accords, etc.
So you'd drive the US into financial ruin for Ukraine if that is what it took? Why is Ukraine that important?
Posted on 12/12/24 at 9:31 am to VolSquatch
quote:
So you'd drive the US into financial ruin for Ukraine if that is what it took? Why is Ukraine that important?
My opinion is based on what Ukraine would do not on what the US should do.
I’m not got putting our soldiers in harms way, and I am not for giving Ukraine a blank check.
I’m for Ukraine even if we decided to cut off all aid.
Popular
Back to top


0





