- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 11/4/22 at 11:19 pm to El Segundo Guy
Fully agree about the Bradley. For our forces they are a complete no go and obsolete. But compared with some of the shite Ukraine has had to keep running to fight this war they would be useful just for the fact that they can carry troops to the front while having enough armor to give them protection from small arms fire and have a chain gun or anti tank system for some sort of fire support. Not at all the most ideal piece of machinery just like the M113 is obsolete for our forces also but they could at least serve a purpose in Ukraine and we could write them off our books. They have made it clear they need armored vehicles any way they can get them. We don’t need them so it just makes sense to me. If they get blown to shite or break down it’s not like you’re losing a HIMARS or M109. I’m glad they are figuring out a way to get them 90 upgraded T-72s to them though. They already know these systems and can hit the ground running with them. My big question is where are artillery shells going to be coming from if this drags out several more months? South Korea most likely has the largest stockpile of 155 mm right now along with the United States but we are burning through our reserves at an unsustainable pace.
This post was edited on 11/4/22 at 11:28 pm
Posted on 11/4/22 at 11:31 pm to LSUPilot07
ISW Update
quote:
The Russian military is likely trying to use mobilized personnel to restart the Donetsk offensive but will likely still fail to achieve operationally significant gains
quote:
Russian forces are setting conditions for a controlled withdrawal in northwestern Kherson Oblast, likely to avoid a disorderly rout from the right (west) bank of the Dnipro River
quote:
Russian President Vladimir Putin is likely setting conditions to continue covert mobilization, which suggests that partial mobilization did not generate sufficient forces for Putin’s maximalist goals in Ukraine despite Putin’s claims to the contrary
quote:
Russian opposition and online outlets have reported that Russian authorities and businesses are preparing for a second mobilization wave by modernizing military recruitment centers and preparing lists of eligible men.
quote:
Russia’s costly force generation efforts will continue to weigh on the Russian economy and could ignite social tensions if the Kremlin does not fulfill its financial obligations to the participants of the “special military operation
quote:
Iran is likely already exploiting Russian reliance on Iranian-made weapons systems to request Russian assistance with its nuclear program
quote:
Ukrainian Main Military Intelligence Directorate (GUR) representative Andriy Yusov stated on November 4 that GUR has not received information confirming that Iranian missile systems have arrived in Russia despite intelligence that confirms the contract for the transfer of those systems
quote:
Russian forces may be deploying extreme measures against deserting personnel in an attempt to respond to severe morale issues
quote:
Key Takeaways
The Russian military is likely trying to use mobilized personnel to restart its Donetsk offensive but will likely fail to achieve operationally significant gains.
Russian forces are setting conditions for an orderly withdrawal from the west bank of the Dnipro River to avoid a rout in Kherson Oblast.
President Vladimir Putin is likely setting conditions to continue mobilization covertly despite claims that partial mobilization produced sufficient forces.
Russia’s costly force generation measures will likely continue to weigh on the Russian economy and generate social tensions.
Iran is likely exploiting Russian reliance on Iranian-made weapon systems to request Russian assistance with its nuclear program.
Russian forces may be deploying extreme measures against deserting personnel in an attempt to respond to severe morale issues.
Russian sources claimed that Ukrainian forces continued counteroffensive operations in the direction of Kreminna and Svatove.
Russian forces continued to prepare existing and new defensive lines in Kherson Oblast.
Russian forces continued to conduct offensive operations around Bakhmut, Avdiivka, and Donetsk City.
Russian forces continued forced evacuation measures in Kherson Oblast.
Russian and occupation officials continued to set measures for the forced deportation of Ukrainian children to the Russian Federation.
Posted on 11/5/22 at 12:07 am to DJFord
quote:Wrong
It’s odd. The poli board, which actually represents or at least mirrors a large contingent of Americans and people around the world,
quote:. Ya think
has a rightful suspicion of the msm.
quote:. perceived? really?
But bc of the perceived or real lean to the left,
quote:WRONG
EVERYTHING said or written which does not conform to their narrative is false
quote:
Every journalist, politician, every general, every Republican l, every person who does not say what they want to hear is an idiot or corrupt
WRONG again
quote:
Every person who presents a narrative which correlates with their own is right. There is no “reasonable minds can differ”. It is good vs evil. God vs the Devil! Christian vs the pedophile.
Now you are just grasping for straws and the fricking idiot who thinks your post below your post if a bitch for agreeing.
quote:Q... The Q thread was nowhere near as long is this circle jerk warhawking. Similar to THIS thread it was the same dipshits that posted over and over. FTR I think Q and you lame fricks are equally full of shite.
As a result charlatans who want to make a quick buck (I’m talking to you Q
quote:. Sorry Tucker makes you cry. Dude is right 95% of the time. Way more accurate than all of the other hacks in the same time slot on your fav propaganda networks.
Tuck,
quote:. Again, a certifiable nut case. Never supported and those that did a large majority have backed away because he is simply an actor. I can't stand the dude so yes we can be bi-partisan on him & Q.
Alex Jones
quote:. Another fricking lie
who feed them bullshite, they eat it up.
quote:. Have you lost your fricking mind? There is a handful of dumbasses that support him on the board and I think the majority of them are trolling stupid fricks like you. Putin is a POS. We can be bi-partisan on that
Putin is the antithesis of freedom, Christianity, libertarianism and capitalism yet they believe otherwise
quote:. Dude, I rarely stop by to read this train wreck. I have not read anything Putin has said in probably two months. - again another fricking lie
yet they believe otherwise not because of his actions but because he tells them what they want to hear.
quote:yet more lies; let me break it down:
WEF, globalism, freedom, Christianity… they support.
WEF - against
Globalism - against
Freedom - for
Christianity - for
quote:. Dude you honestly need help if you believe the shite you are typing.
So he is here to free the world of “globalism” (whatever the hell that is.. it used to be statism. It changes every few years) and secret biological labs, and trannies/groomers and devil worshippers.
quote:Get a tampon you pussy
It’s very distressing.
quote:wut?? You worship corporatism, not capitalism
trying to participate in western capitalism
quote:You are warmongers - I didn't get a vote on whether to send my tax dollars to an eastern European country versus keeping the money back home and either saving it or using it for infrastructure. If you want to send money to support THEIR war set up a GoFund ME for Ukraine cocksucker, using my money is bullshite.
and democracy yet WE are the “warmongers”
quote:. I honestly, have no idea what you mean by this. I don't follow the war so I will take you at your word on this because the burden of truth would be on me.
The invaders are the ones seeking peace!
quote:. Nice concern troll to polish off this turd of a post. Go back to your FB Boomer.
I’m actually sad yet thankful
quote:
I’m in my 60s and won’t live to see what ultimately becomes of this.

Posted on 11/5/22 at 12:16 am to Jim Rockford
quote:
You sho is mad
I was doing fine until I finished reading his post and realized he was a boomer
No offense unless you are a boomer as well.
Posted on 11/5/22 at 5:56 am to DJFord
Multiple Intercepts are talking about 35-38 RU in one incident and 12-15 in another being mowed down by GRU/Chechen blocking units trying to flee combat zone. Looking forward to explanation/notes
Posted on 11/5/22 at 6:25 am to DJFord
quote:
many of whom are dying, no food
Are the Russians running out of food again?
Posted on 11/5/22 at 6:42 am to NPComb
quote:
The Q thread was nowhere near as long is this circle jerk warhawking.
Oh really?
It had over three times the number of pages but don't let facts get in the way of a good rant.
BTW "war-hawking circle jerk" is a better use of the language or you could have labeled posters here as circle-jerking warhawks.
Posted on 11/5/22 at 7:01 am to NPComb
quote:hahahahahahahhahahahahahahha
The Q thread was nowhere near as long is this circle jerk warhawking
Posted on 11/5/22 at 7:04 am to Highthoughts
quote:
Highthoughts
quote:
Member since Sep 2022
56 posts
Posted on 11/5/22 at 7:06 am to SDVTiger
quote:
SDVTiger
quote:
Number of posts: 63076
Posted on 11/5/22 at 7:13 am to RLDSC FAN
British Defence Intelligence
UPDATE ON UKRAINE 5 November 2022
INTELLIGENCE UPDATE
Russia is probably struggling to provide military training for its current mobilisation drive and its annual autumn conscription intake. The Russian Armed Forces were already stretched providing training for the approximate 300,000 troops required for its 'partial mobilisation, announced on 21 September 2022. These issues will be compounded by the additional regular autumn annual conscription cycle, announced on 30 September 2022 and starting 01 November 2022, which is usually expected to bring in an additional 120,000 personnel.
Newly mobilised conscripts likely have minimal training or no training at all. Experienced officers and trainers have been deployed to fight in Ukraine and some have likely been killed in the conflict.
Russian forces are conducting training in Belarus due to a shortage of training staff, munitions and facilities in Russia. Deploying forces with little or no training provides little additional offensive combat capability.
UPDATE ON UKRAINE 5 November 2022
INTELLIGENCE UPDATE
Russia is probably struggling to provide military training for its current mobilisation drive and its annual autumn conscription intake. The Russian Armed Forces were already stretched providing training for the approximate 300,000 troops required for its 'partial mobilisation, announced on 21 September 2022. These issues will be compounded by the additional regular autumn annual conscription cycle, announced on 30 September 2022 and starting 01 November 2022, which is usually expected to bring in an additional 120,000 personnel.
Newly mobilised conscripts likely have minimal training or no training at all. Experienced officers and trainers have been deployed to fight in Ukraine and some have likely been killed in the conflict.
Russian forces are conducting training in Belarus due to a shortage of training staff, munitions and facilities in Russia. Deploying forces with little or no training provides little additional offensive combat capability.
Posted on 11/5/22 at 7:17 am to WestCoastAg
quote:
hahahahahahahhahahahahahahha

Posted on 11/5/22 at 7:17 am to cypher
quote:
Russia is probably struggling
Why do these Brit reports you post daily always start with this?
Posted on 11/5/22 at 7:29 am to NPComb
quote:woo boy, what a melt
NPComb
Posted on 11/5/22 at 7:33 am to SDVTiger
quote:
quote:Russia is probably struggling
Why do these Brit reports you post daily always start with this?
The writer is probably struggling with finding ways to present his and other experts’ assumptions based on the facts presented and their knowledge and experience with militaries and diplomats in general and including Russia and its military in general without stating for certain bc they are not at every particular area or situation.
See what I did there? I do not know for certain but given the context and my appreciation of what is happening from my reading of the situation and seeing firsthand videos of the war, I can assume more probable than not ie “probably” & “likely” and because of my extensive studying of the conflict and reporting of same that I am correct.
This as opposed to some people who have a preconceived narrative of what is happening and search the bowels of YouTube and the poli board to confirm their bias or those writers who do the same.
Hope this helps!
This post was edited on 11/5/22 at 7:36 am
Posted on 11/5/22 at 7:36 am to DJFord
quote:
The writer is probably struggling with finding ways to present his and other experts’ assumptions based on the facts presented
Or they are just making shite up
The ISW is the same
Posted on 11/5/22 at 7:39 am to DJFord
quote:
my extensive studying of the conflict
Popular
Back to top


0







