Started By
Message

re: LA Supreme Court just struck down law expanding time to file suit against molesters

Posted on 3/22/24 at 5:20 pm to
Posted by Sao
East Texas Piney Woods
Member since Jun 2009
65802 posts
Posted on 3/22/24 at 5:20 pm to
quote:

I wonder how this will affect the Archdiocese of New Orleans’s bankruptcy case.

It should throw out some of those cases that came from the shadows looking for a payday.

kill all pedophiles! (unless they're our Priests)
Posted by rt3
now in the piney woods of Pineville
Member since Apr 2011
141209 posts
Posted on 3/22/24 at 5:33 pm to
quote:

Does anyone know if the St George opinion came out? I thought it was supposed to be released this week

It does not look like St. George came out

They did rule today that the NOLA City Council can sue LaToya and others over the Wisner Trust
Posted by brewhan davey
Audubon Place
Member since Sep 2010
32798 posts
Posted on 3/22/24 at 5:44 pm to
quote:

Randomly and temporarily changing statutory limitations for such a unique purpose is contrary to having them in the first place.

Molesters suck but have to side with courts on this one.


Agree. Due process trumps all. In the majority opinion, the Court even acknowledged how horrible the underlying facts of these kinds of cases are, but noted that it was bound by the due process clause of the constitution:

"despite the sickening and despicable factual allegations in this case, we must conclude that La. R.S. 9:2800.9, as amended by the revival provisions, cannot be applied to revive plaintiffs' prescribed causes of action. To find otherwise would divest defendants of the vested right to plead prescription in violation of Art. I, Section 2 of the Louisiana Constitution."
This post was edited on 3/22/24 at 5:46 pm
Posted by TIGERVATO
Spring, TX.
Member since Jan 2008
1502 posts
Posted on 3/22/24 at 6:48 pm to
Louisiana is becoming more and more like California.
Posted by tLSU
Member since Oct 2007
8623 posts
Posted on 3/22/24 at 6:55 pm to
I don't care if they make certain claims never prescribe. The issue I had was taking a claim which already prescribed and subsequently changing the prescriptive period and letting it proceed. And the prescriptive period really isnt unreasonable. It's by the age 28. 10 years into adulthood.
Posted by michael corleone
baton rouge
Member since Jun 2005
5817 posts
Posted on 3/22/24 at 8:19 pm to
The better reasoning would be expost facto.
Posted by BigBinBR
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2023
4226 posts
Posted on 3/22/24 at 8:28 pm to
quote:

of the Louisiana Constitution.


Here is the real problem. Our state has way too much in the constitution, and every election there are 6 or 7 more amendments to vote on.

It’s ridiculous.

Still, I’m guessing that the legislature can now just send this to the voters to add to the constitution, and then their decision becomes moot.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
80290 posts
Posted on 3/22/24 at 8:35 pm to
Ex post facto is making behavior a crime after it’s happened. This was always a crime and still is. It was also subject to civil suit but that period prescribed. Once it prescribed, the defendant had a constitutional due process interest in it not being revived by the simple whim of the Legislature.
This post was edited on 3/22/24 at 8:37 pm
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
54465 posts
Posted on 3/22/24 at 8:39 pm to
quote:

Louisiana is becoming more and more like California.

I don't think you understand what you are talking about......at all.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98948 posts
Posted on 3/22/24 at 8:52 pm to
Bergdorf fingerbang victim gonna learn a hard lesson
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98948 posts
Posted on 3/22/24 at 8:55 pm to
quote:

And yet Trump has a 30 year old rape case, after New York changed their law on reporting sexual assault


Don't think the due process reasoning in this decision isn't going to be asserted in NY.

This has always been a fundamental issue with that case.
Posted by EmperorGout
I hate all of you.
Member since Feb 2008
11272 posts
Posted on 3/22/24 at 9:06 pm to
quote:

Randomly and temporarily changing statutory limitations for such a unique purpose is contrary to having them in the first place.

Molesters suck but have to side with courts on this one.

They could do this with any crime and make people defend themselves 20 years later.


Statutes of limitation exist for a reason, even for the most vile of crimes
Posted by PowerTool
The dark side of the road
Member since Dec 2009
21185 posts
Posted on 3/22/24 at 9:12 pm to
quote:

Explain this to me like Im 10


That's what got em into trouble in the first place.
Posted by Tigerlaff
FIGHTING out of the Carencro Sonic
Member since Jan 2010
20882 posts
Posted on 3/22/24 at 9:14 pm to
quote:

Statutes of limitation exist for a reason, even for the most vile of crimes


There are no criminal statutes of limitation for murder in any jurisdiction I know of. LA has no statute of limitations for first degree rape either.

Civil suits for torts (wrongful death, battery, assault, infliction of emotional distress, etc.) do have limits.
This post was edited on 3/22/24 at 9:16 pm
Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
23744 posts
Posted on 3/22/24 at 9:19 pm to
Prescription does not destroy a cause of action pursuant to Louisiana law. It merely bars its assertion. The legislature can lift the bar that they created.

Tort claims are not constitutional. They are entirely statutory. The legislature can repeal CC art 2315 tomorrow and that would not violate the constitution. They can create a cause of action by enacting a statute.

The legislature can make statutes retroactively applicable if they explicitly declare it to be so.

While it may not be good legislative practice to do this, it isn’t unconstitutional. Well, now it is. But conceptually it should not be.
Posted by tiger91
In my own little world
Member since Nov 2005
36732 posts
Posted on 3/22/24 at 9:21 pm to
Just what I was thinking .. will they put time limits on rape cases??
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram