- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Kyle Rittenhouse was released on bond, now he's nowhere to be found
Posted on 2/4/21 at 2:11 pm to RIPMachoMan
Posted on 2/4/21 at 2:11 pm to RIPMachoMan
quote:
I hope so for his sake
But if he’s tried for murder as an adult, surely this whole ‘he’s a minor’ narrative is BS, right?
1
Posted on 2/4/21 at 2:12 pm to JG77056
quote:
But if he’s tried for murder as an adult, surely this whole ‘he’s a minor’ narrative is BS, right?
To me? No. He is a minor
His parents or whoever is caring for him are more at fault in my opinion
This post was edited on 2/4/21 at 2:13 pm
Posted on 2/4/21 at 2:13 pm to MontyFranklyn
quote:
lives can't.
Then they shouldn't have tried to kill him forcing him self defend.
Posted on 2/4/21 at 2:14 pm to RIPMachoMan
Trying him as an adult would prove he’s not a minor, legally speaking, no? You can’t give someone the rights of a minor but the responsibilities of an adult.
Posted on 2/4/21 at 2:17 pm to theronswanson
Because the mob doesn't get to decide innocence or guilt.
Even monsters deserve their day in court.
Even monsters deserve their day in court.
This post was edited on 2/4/21 at 2:19 pm
Posted on 2/4/21 at 2:19 pm to JG77056
quote:
Trying him as an adult would prove he’s not a minor, legally speaking, no?
Does it? Not following your point. You asked if it was BS calling him a minor if tried as an adult. Again, not to me.
It's my opinion that as a minor someone is responsible for his well being.
Traveling what many here said wasn't very far to a chaotic scene while armed seems like something I hope an adult could have prevented their kid from doing.
Posted on 2/4/21 at 2:19 pm to Mr. Hangover
quote:OK
Throw all proper decorum out the window. Throw out using your fricking brain and protecting what’s right and chastising what’s wrong. This whole fricking bull shite situation has turned into WW1 trench warfare, but in a political sense. Everyone choose a side, dig in, and never relent...
quote:I don't condone anyone burning down anything and fanning the flames.
BLM, antifa, etc were in the process of burning down our country. The media fueled and perpetuated that fire and our worthless politicians sat on their ducking hands and did NOTHING. So some Americans took it upon themselves to protect communities
quote:Kyle played the role of a vigilante. Again, it would be a total different situation if his house or family's business were in direct harm. Him wanting to go protect a friend's business doesn't fly. He's a child trying to act like an adult. Now, he has to face adult consequences. No way I would encourage or even let a child get themselves in a situation like that. I'm more disappointed in the adults in the situation. His mom for taking him and the business owner who influenced him. That's what's really sad.
’m not a lawyer. I don’t know every single gun law nor do I care to. But I do know right from wrong and I stand by my opinion that Kyle Rittenhouse did NOTHING wrong given the circumstances. He (and thousands others) felt like SOMETHING needed to be done so he went.
quote:You equate the criticism of Kyle's action as condoning the actions of those that were causing community damage and it's not the case. Sorry
If you liberals still feel the need to defend BLM and antifa, that’s on you, but please let it be known publicly that you support these people
Posted on 2/4/21 at 2:29 pm to TDTOM
quote:
I didn't think he took the gun with him from home.
He didn't. And he lived very close by. And he worked in Kenosha.
So this narrative of he shouldn't have even been there or implying he came from far off because "he crossed state lines" is just BS to push some kind of narrative that he went out looking to murder innocent people because he's also a white supremacist.
Posted on 2/4/21 at 2:30 pm to IAmNERD
Is this kid still on the lamb?
Posted on 2/4/21 at 2:32 pm to MontyFranklyn
quote:
Kyle played the role of a vigilante. Again, it would be a total different situation if his house or family's business were in direct harm. Him wanting to go protect a friend's business doesn't fly. He's a child trying to act like an adult.
Why he was there is irrelevant to him defending himself when attacked by three people.
Posted on 2/4/21 at 2:33 pm to RLDSC FAN
kyle rittenhouse is a massive fricking pussy and he ruined his life by being an absolute moron
Posted on 2/4/21 at 2:35 pm to MontyFranklyn
quote:
property can be replaced, lives can't.
That's the same line you dumbass liberals used all summer while business owners had to watch their livelihoods get taken away for no reason because an angry mob of leftist militants burned it down while protesting made up racism and oppression.
If I owned a store, and I saw a bunch of rioters come at it with torches, I don't have a right to defend it? If that's your stance, you can go frick yourself.
Posted on 2/4/21 at 2:35 pm to WWII Collector
quote:
Is this kid still on the lamb?
He never was. He and his family received threats and moved to a different place where they felt they would be safer. His legal team tried to get his whereabouts to the prosecution and have it sealed where the location of the family wouldn't be leaked. In turn, the prosecutor said he wasn't gonna do that and put it out that he "can't be found" because he isn't at the address in the bond documents.
Or something like that. Just another smear tactic.
This post was edited on 2/4/21 at 2:37 pm
Posted on 2/4/21 at 2:36 pm to MontyFranklyn
quote:
Him wanting to go protect a friend's business doesn't fly.
What kind of soy boy bullshite is this?
Posted on 2/4/21 at 2:38 pm to VADawg
quote:Yes, if YOU OWNED it. The key in that is YOU being the OWNER!
If I owned a store, and I saw a bunch of rioters come at it with torches, I don't have a right to defend it?
Posted on 2/4/21 at 2:40 pm to MontyFranklyn
quote:
Yes, if YOU OWNED it. The key in that is YOU being the OWNER!
If someone in my family or a close friend owned it, I would defend it the same way. Rioters who try to burn down small businesses should be shot on the spot. Those people are subhuman scum, just like the people that Kyle shot.
This post was edited on 2/4/21 at 2:41 pm
Posted on 2/4/21 at 2:41 pm to VADawg
Ok, it wasn't a family member's property either. Just a friend's.
Posted on 2/4/21 at 2:43 pm to MontyFranklyn
quote:
Because Rittenhouse killed someone, property can be replaced, lives can't. My point is he put himself in this position and so did the guys who died.
frick people that want to destroy property, they forfeit their right to life by attacking someone else's property. Same goes for the Capital rioters. When you choose violence, you must be prepared to get responded to with violence.
Posted on 2/4/21 at 2:44 pm to MontyFranklyn
quote:
Ok, it wasn't a family member's property either. Just a friend's.
I would defend a friend's business too. Someone needs to make it a point to show the rioters and looters that what they're doing is wrong.
Ron DeSantis pushed legislation in Florida basically declaring open season on looters and rioters. It would have been nice to have that nationwide.
"Business owners have insurance so they'll be fine" is a bullshite excuse for the rioters and looters acting like wild animals.
This post was edited on 2/4/21 at 2:45 pm
Posted on 2/4/21 at 2:44 pm to RIPMachoMan
quote:
To meet up where a mob is gathering? You don't say
It's telling you think him traveling across state lines armed is wrong as well as meeting with other like-minded non-violent people. But the actual mob? Not so much.
Page 17 of 20
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News